User talk:Wealth Analysis

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Hello, I'm A Frantic Turtle. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of music artists by net worth, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. • a frantic turtle 🐢 15:25, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of sourced or cited material on List of music artists by net worth. Recent edit made had verifiable information and reference. Wealth Analysis (talk) 16:00, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition of "Joël Fils-Aimé" as leading the list with 42.3 billion, a figure ~20 times greater than any other on the list, is not credible. It's not even a question of providing a source. It's an outright fabrication. Any such person attracting that much wealth compared to other artists would be extremely well known in the world today. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:12, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with your personal feelings about this topic because Joël Fils-Aimé as leading the list with 42.3 billion, a well-known public figure globally isn't outright fabrication. He's a well-known Haitian politician in real life who's generated wealth through his music career and business ventures including created his own digital currency while investing into startup companies and has proven it numerous times. Your information is inaccurate because of the false news and paid websites you've been monitoring. His wealth cannot be compared to other artists because of radio plays. Wealth Analysis (talk) 16:26, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Accusing me of vandalism [1] and of monitoring false news and paid websites (as you claim above) will get you nowhere. The draft you un-rejected (which I am undoing) contains nine references. NONE of those references mention this person. Being such a famous person, I'm quite confident you can cite sources supporting the notability of this person. See WP:NPERSON for some clarification. The reality is that searches for "Joël Fils-Aimé" turn up only entries on Simple English Wikipedia which were both deleted in the last week. Having an article on Wikipedia about someone is a rather simple process. You put together sources that support the notability of that person and then you write an article based on those sources. As of now, you have zero sources. If you persist in your behavior trying to claim fame of this person and vandalizing articles in a vain attempt to support such fame, you will be blocked. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:08, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You need to follow Wikipedia policy's for Draft article's and living people who are currently in an active election or is seeking political office. Wealth Analysis (talk) 17:14, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

And what policy would that be? --Hammersoft (talk) 17:20, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This user appears to be the globally locked m:Special:CentralAuth/NextLevelMix. See also the block of their TA on Simple. • a frantic turtle 🐢 17:20, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

So now your decided course of action at Draft:Joël Fils-Aimé is to edit war against two editors? Do you really think that doing this will lead to this draft being accepted? Again, not ONE reference added to this draft even mentions this person. This draft will never be accepted in its current form. So what's your plan? Edit war to your preferred version 10 times? 100 times? 1000? --Hammersoft (talk) 17:29, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  Hammersoft (talk) 17:33, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You do not have rights to BLOCK editors or DISAPPROVED draft articles of a living people, please restrain yourself from vandalizing Wikipedia pages. Wealth Analysis (talk) 17:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to be unblocked, please see the instructions above. However, persisting in conducting vandalism, such as you did here, is not a good way to convince people here that you are a good-faith editor. I strongly suggest you rethink your approach if you want to edit here. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:39, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]