User talk:Newcumer80

Hello, Newcumer80, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Donovan Scott did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  BlueboyLINY (talk) 04:01, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

yes so why did you use original resource then from a Geneology record, that is what original research is? it clearly state the 1946 birth year, and sources that i added to resemble Oliver Hardy in that Film, so please go away!!! Newcumer80 (talk) 04:10, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

All of referneces have been added, message is constituatess bullying Newcumer80 (talk) 04:17, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Newcumer80! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of Donovan Scott. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Donovan Scott, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 04:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Luther Saxon when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Georgie Sterling when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:52, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Elaine Lee actress.webp. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:James ellliot alf sutcliffe.webp. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:30, 12 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:James ellliot alf sutcliffe.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:26, 15 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Binny Lum, a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3DB was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Alan hopgood wally.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Alan hopgood wally.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 05:28, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are becoming disruptive. You have been warned multiple times about the need to use preview to check your edits, yet you continue to introduce unknown parameters into articles. You did this again at Michael Wohlfahrt when you modified the page, you once again did this. If you continue your disruptive editing, you may find yourself blocked from editing. Please take the time to review your edits moving forward. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 13:59, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Moya OSullivan.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 18:16, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Moya OSullivan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 06:12, 8 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Moya osullivan marlene.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 06:34, 9 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Toni lamond entertainer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 01:49, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Toni lamond entetainer2.webp. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:42, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Tommy dysart jock.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:17, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The above also applies to File:Kevin miles actor.jpg, File:Martin v actor.jpg, and File:Paul-cronin dave.jpg. Assuming you found all of these images online, it would be a big help if you could add a link to the websites where you found the files to their respective file descriptions. Ideally, the link should show the article/page where you found the image that also includes information about the website/publication itself. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:20, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for providing links; unfortunately, though, none of them seem to work (i.e., show the image in question being used), at least not for me. Could you double check them? Ideally, the link should show the same image as you uploaded being used somewhere online, which also provides some information about the site itself. Linking to general search results (archived or otherwise) isn't very helpful, and links to old online articles which are now overwritten or otherwise redirect to another page don't aid in verification at all. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:44, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gordon Ingate, links pointing to the disambiguation pages American Eagle and Amy Walsh were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Toni lamond entetainer2.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:43, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry Hopkinson, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen Mary was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ron shand performer..webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 7 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philippa Baker (actress), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Three Sisters was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:22, 9 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Preston. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:50, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Continued disruptive editing and refusal to comunicate. As you have refused to respond to any messages here... Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:15, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, Newcumer80, does not comply with Wikipedia's username policy. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy (see summary).

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change to this account.

• To create a new account with a different username, use this form. If you are unable to fill this form while logged in, try logging out.
• If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by using the unblock wizard or by posting an appeal on your talk page.

Before requesting a new username, you should check if it's available first. To do this, simply navigate to this search page and enter the username into the search field. If the search returns, "There is no global account for [username]", that means the username you entered is available.

Appeals: If your username is not in violation of Wikipedia's username policy, and if you believe that this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by submitting a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.

Thank you. Mfield (Oi!) 03:27, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]