User talk:Hosterr

Hello, I'm Iiii I I I. An edit that you recently made to Balen Shah seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Iiii I I I (talk) 07:39, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you're right. It was written by Google AI Mode. I just wanted to make that page so longer and indpeth ( Big fan of shah) so every person can find anything in that page about him.

IMO most of that page content is AI. Hosterr (talk) 08:36, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hosterr! Your additions to Rameshwor Prasad Khanal have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iiii I I I (talk) 01:34, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I apologies for it. I am sorry. Hosterr (talk) 10:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Blooket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TYPEINFO (talk) 10:46, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why the page was deleted it was about a game called Blooket. Played by more then 13 Million players from USA. And I am really huge fan of the game. Hosterr (talk) 07:55, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hosterr. Thank you for your work on Shantanu Dhakal. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Since it falls under WP:BLP, please find better sources and footnote each claim with a reliable source. Please note that self-published sources such as Facebook and X can generally not be used. Please also establish notability as per WP:BIO. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:52, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mariamnei hi thanks bruda, as of Facebook some big media company is being used as source who has got more then 1Million followers. isn't that reliable and data are also extracted from videos. if not then don't worry I will do it soon. ~2025-31381-94 (talk) 11:37, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SELFSOURCE. Have a wonderful day! Mariamnei (talk) 12:06, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Shantanu Dhakal. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:52, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjayay I wanted to add those external links as reference. I know in body only internal links should be there but I don't see any option for that so I just inserted in body. ~2025-31381-94 (talk) 13:38, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and follow Help:Referencing for beginners and take heed of the advice above that Facebook is NOT considered a WP:Reliable source as per WP:RSPFACEBOOK - you need sources from an independent publisher with a reputation for fact-checking. - Arjayay (talk) 13:43, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for it. I am searching for references as articles. BTw I am not allowed to add images on that page. Can you please help me by adding one image of that guy in the page. (https://scontent.fktm7-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/453876772_890593023118588_3860299639573908926_n.jpg?_nc_cat=1&cb2=99be929b-bd9a46d7&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=6ee11a&_nc_eui2=AeHvHsSxDOgYMMiu7vl40aGSnVfd44w9eAmdV93jjD14CeQ2JYwjYDqRZ2LpuX7oHzCgTp9FmNvf1WLfX80XqamE&_nc_ohc=jtGjy5AV5OYQ7kNvwGxdFbj&_nc_oc=AdlDDmyIOfY8VAHZZkcNw2Sp-9NEyMbAsWpAO2JN4cZdV32GETRDXyRBW33yQzTK2jQ&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent.fktm7-1.fna&_nc_gid=UiB0B3fbIahUSFw6NEWISQ&oh=00_AflydM6cIev-sQxgLufk1xse5fDdTQQqkSTaoPVsfMrZHw&oe=6940D33D)

This image is from that living subject facebook profile. If the image need to be totally original then I dont know how i would do it.

Do i need to meet him by person and take an image ???

That's not much hard to do as he is a student and must be in collage at day time. Hosterr (talk) 16:38, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shantanu Dhakal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BLP1E.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Fram (talk) 10:53, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram please undelete it I will manage to get references in some days ~2025-31381-94 (talk) 11:32, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shantanu Dhakal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shantanu Dhakal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 12:04, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Hosterr (talk) 13:34, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Brian dean, needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🄻🄰 14:56, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me example of reliable sources please ?? The references I've provided there are top brands and dominating sites on those niche. I request you to check their brand value ( of references ), check their domain ratings, GMB reviews if avilable and other data so can find out that they are. Hosterr (talk) 16:43, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hosterr. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Backlinko, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 🄻🄰 14:57, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for this. I am one of the SEO's myself founding Racecode.xyz a blooket wiki. And I've learned a lotta things from Brain Dean. While I know him, due to his course, teaching, blogs and tools like explodingtopic. I dont have any personal relation with brain.

Wait, what does it mean ? You've moved that to draft. Why ? As of reliable references most of the sites are dominating sites in SEO industry who I've linked to ? Hosterr (talk) 15:04, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My bad sorry for mistake. I thought you moved my other page to draft. As, of backlinks don't worry I will improve it. Hosterr (talk) 15:06, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. ACROM12 [TALK] 08:02, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Acrom12 🤔 ~2025-31381-94 (talk) 12:17, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did I wrote anything without references ??. The article/ page I've created was based on facts and the news taken from trusted sources. It was not my personal opinion. Hosterr (talk) 11:59, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MetalBreaksAndBends. I noticed that you recently removed content from Draft:Blooket without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MetalBreaksAndBends (talk) 14:09, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MetalBreaksAndBends it was not a mistake you guys are not letting me publish a page about blooket so I removed it. ~2025-31381-94 (talk) 15:08, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

someone may come along and improve the page to a degree where its good enough to get published. MetalBreaksAndBends (talk) 15:13, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hosterr. I noticed that you blanked the page at Draft:Blooket and replaced it with a note that you were "taking" the content for your website, and it appears that you have in fact made a copy of the draft's content at the link you provided. You should be aware that reusing Wikipedia content is allowed, but you are required to give credit to the original contributors of that content. Generally, providing a link on your website to the page with the content that you used meets the conditions of our site license. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content for more details, and see the "Example notice" section for an example of a copyright notice that meets the requirements. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:17, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Link I've provided was an article I wrote 2 days ago and most of the content is written by myself without taking information from blooket. The only part of wiki data I've taken about is this "''Blooket was created in 2018 by Ben Stewart as a game-based learning platform designed to improve student engagement compared to existing tools at the time. After its launch, the platform continued to grow through regular updates that introduced new game modes, interface improvements, and seasonal events tied to holidays such as Christmas and Halloween. These updates often included limited-time Blooks and special competitions. In January 2025, Blooket expanded its educational tools by partnering with Khan Academy, allowing players to use the Khanmigo AI assistant to help generate questions within the platform."

I can only add wikipedia as references if there is some article about the topic. Hosterr (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The two main points are that you deleted the content here, which you had no right to do, and your attribution link will be a link to the draft, ideally to the specific version. Largoplazo (talk) 17:20, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IDK what to say Hosterr (talk) 18:20, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hosterr,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Blooket Wikis for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TheLongTone (talk) 15:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It's important for encycopedia to contain an article about that topic is very simple. To find information about encyclopedia related to an education game called blooket. Hosterr (talk) 10:17, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It's important only if the topic meets the criteria for notability. A new article about web sites and applications needs at least to clearly be about something of significance to avoid being deleted speedily as it was, but if the topic can't be demonstrated to be notable, it may be deleted. Largoplazo (talk) 15:06, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ig it does. The topic "Blook encyclopedia" are very famous among the game players on planet. Where the game blooket get around 13 Million players per month and the encyclopedias of that game get's around 1 Million visitors per 2 month. One of the famous wiki of game include blooket.fandom.com / racecode.xyz / mira blooket wiki / blookipedia / reddit blooket........

So, afaik it meets the criteria of notability. Hosterr (talk) 16:04, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the page since the deletion is contested, and speedy deletion is only for unambiguous cases (courtesy ping CoconutOctopus). However I agree that this is probably not a notable topic for a separate encyclopedia article, considering that your Draft:Blooket has been repeatedly rejected on the basis of notability. Wikipedia is not a business directory nor a repository of external links. If you are not able to build out the article with reliable sources that demonstrate that the topic is notable, it likely will be deleted again, possibly quickly. I would suggest you consider adding information about the wiki to your draft, and focus on expanding that and demonstrating notability for the game itself instead. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:28, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ivan, I believe this article does plainly meet the criteria for A7 deletion as it nowhere makes any claim of notability. Anyone can contest a speedy deletion; that does not automatically mean it will not be deleted; that's WP:PROD. CoconutOctopus talk 16:33, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Particularly since, in this case, the objection was by the creator, who is singled out as the one person who may not remove a speedy deletion tag from a page and can only ask on the talk page to have the deletion request rejected. Articles are speedy-deleted over the objection of creators all the time. Largoplazo (talk) 16:54, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. It's at AfD now, though I maintain my original deletion was entirely valid (and judging by the fact this article was immediately nominated for A7 again, I'm not alone). CoconutOctopus talk 16:59, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this is an odd interpretation of the policy: If an editor other than the creator removes a speedy deletion tag in good faith, it should be taken as a sign that the deletion is controversial and another deletion process should be used. (emphasis mine) Ca ^{talk to me!} 17:14, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Blooket Wikis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ca ^{talk to me!} 16:46, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blooket Wikis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blooket Wikis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CoconutOctopus talk 16:56, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am getting bombardment of blooket wikis pages in my talk page man. Can any one person send me message on one topic ? Hosterr (talk) 07:36, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, these notifications are automatic! I understand why it could be a lot at once though, hopefully that's them now. CoconutOctopus talk 08:11, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miraj Dhungana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miraj Dhungana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Agent 007 (talk) 15:17, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I always get this so called "An editor has nominated this article for deletion." tag on my everypage man. Please discuss fast. Hosterr (talk) 15:40, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Article creators are supposed to be notified when an article they created is being discussed for potential deletion. It's assumed they wouldn't prefer to discover some day that the article has just disappeared with no explanation to them and with no opportunity given to them to defend the existence of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 17:22, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you mr. Hosterr (talk) 07:58, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with out notability policies before creating any more articles. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:14, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sagar Dhakal (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm only seeing one possibly reliable source [1] , but it reads like a press release and is not attributed to an author.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sagar Dhakal (politician), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagar Dhakal (politician) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm B.Jayden. I noticed that in this edit to The Theory of Everything (2014 film), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ‎ ‎ B⠄Jayden ^(talk) 13:58, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It was a mistake. My internet sucks sometimes. Hosterr (talk) 14:04, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shantanu Dhakal, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. 9ninety (talk) 03:34, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hosterr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Backlinko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hosterr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brian Dean, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hosterr. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Backlinko".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:25, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hosterr. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Brian Dean".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:25, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hosterr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shree Krishna Luitel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]