User talk:DareshMohan

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Thilsebatti, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Kyle Paul to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Thilsebatti (talk) 07:56, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DareshMohan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thilsebatti (talk) 07:56, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Draft:Double Occupanty has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 13 § Draft:Double Occupanty until a consensus is reached. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Double Occupanty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:58, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

After reading the film's premise in reviews, I feel it is Ranma ½ with a twist. Does it remind you of the same? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:25, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: I don't watch anime, does a reliable source confirm the same? DareshMohan (talk) 23:54, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Um, no. I just brought up this topic for the heck of it, don't think I'd add even if I found a source. Just thought you'd read the articles and compare them. In fact, I'd seen only a few episodes of Ranma 1/2. Kailash29792 (talk) 00:25, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have created this draft. Do you see potential? Manick22, please feel free to edit since I don't fully understand the MOS of plays. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:38, 21 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Bro even Chocolate Krishna by Crazy Mohan doesn't have enough sources. Both aren't notable. DareshMohan (talk) 16:46, 21 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should have an article as well. The Hindu most likely covered it extensively, searching for sources although many of their articles over 10 years old are dying. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:50, 21 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Long back I tried searching for sources there was only sources on how many times it was staged and the fact that Maadhu Balaji appeared everytime the play was staged. DareshMohan (talk) 16:52, 21 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Please take over Draft:Chocolate Krishna, I have no interest in the same. DareshMohan (talk) 22:42, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up, Chocolate Krishna currently redirects to Crazy Mohan. DareshMohan (talk) 23:53, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Parithabangal Gopi–Sudhakar, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:36, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Was it really Gemini's last film? This implies otherwise. Wonder how we're gonna rewrite the articles now. I can't via mobile. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:48, 4 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DareshMohan! Can you check and fix the article God Father (2016 film)? Thanks in advance! ~2026-38436-56 (talk) 15:56, 6 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]