User talk:Cabrils

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following: Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page. Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end. Please specify a descriptive subject or headline for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed. Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply. ⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

I deleted a paragraph from the Born Sexy Yesterday page because the sources provided were flimsy and did not back up the claims being made in the paragraph. It was regarding the paragraph on the relationship between Eleven and Mike Wheeler on Stranger Things. The source provided did not actually explain why Mike and Eleven were a depiction of the trope, and the paragraph stated that “film critics”(plural) criticized them for being a Born Sexy Yesterday trope, but only linked the aforementioned article. Considering Mike and Eleven were both child characters portrayed by child actors, I think having them as an example of an inherently sexual trope is problematic. The change I made was reverted, and I admit I am unfamiliar with the editing rules of Wikipedia so i probably did not follow editing protocol, but I would like to discuss it further. Best regards, Katydid568 (talk) 02:53, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your note. Whilst Wikipedia is open source, in that anyone can contribute and make edits, it is governed by policies that have been developed by consensus over many years. Unfortunately I am not in a good position to cover the vastness of them, so I would encourage you to make your own inquiries starting at least with WP:HOW. Discussions about the specific content of pages is best had on the Talk page of the subject, in this case at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Born_Sexy_Yesterday. All the best. Cabrils (talk) 05:53, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cabrils!

I appreciate your feedback to this draft I produced and have worked hard to try to address all the issues. I've disclosed a potential conflict of interest (and explained why I failed to do so!) as well as add multiple citations to support my claim at notability of the individual. I'm very new to this and appreciate the time you are putting into reviewing my efforts. Happy to make further edits as needed.

"Infofilly (talk) 20:31, 22 March 2026 (UTC)"[reply]

Hi @Infofilly, thanks for the ping. Please see my comment on the draft's Talk page, where further discussion is best placed to occur. Cabrils (talk) 06:41, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition of Cabrils for accumulating at least 200 points in the January–February 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 27,750 articles and 7,050 redirects during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 17:00, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		Backlog Crusher Award
		This award is given in recognition of Cabrils for reviewing at least 50 pages that were more than 40 days old at the time of review during the January–February 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped reduce the older backlog and made an important impact during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 17:12, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		Worm Gear Award
		This award is given in recognition of Cabrils for accumulating at least 7 points during each week of Phase 2 of the January–February 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 27,750 articles and 7,050 redirects during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 17:30, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cabrils. I hope you are doing well. I submitted this draft a while ago, but it hasn't been reviewed by anyone yet. Can you please take a look when you have time? HRShami (talk) HRShami (talk) 05:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HRShami,

Thanks for the ping.

The draft looks good to me-- just one element that I think would improve it would be to add a link to Lieberman at a UCLA url. His CV PDF is fine but I always feel a link to a university page adds considerable credibility/notability. Let me know what you think and if you are able to do that, please let me know and I'd be happy to accept the draft into mainspace. Cabrils (talk) 07:00, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing. Just added the link his university profile in external links. HRShami (talk) 11:20, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HRShami,

The link you added was to his personal website at marvinlieberman.com, which is already on the page. I am suggesting adding a relevant link to a page on UCLA's website eg https://www-apache.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty_pages/marvin.lieberman/ . And this should be added somewhere in the opening section-- I think sourcing the opening sentence would be appropriate ie at the end of the very first sentence. What do you think? Cabrils (talk) 23:38, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ah all right. I added the link to his person website in the infobox and the link to the university page in external links; the same link you mentioned above. I understand you want to provide a citation for the named chair in the beginning of the article as it would help establish notability.

Three reasons I did not do that:

1. Most of the featured articles I have seen do not cited any sources in the lead section. I think I read it somewhere that lead sections should not cite sources since all the information is already cited in the text below.

2. Secondly, notability is already established through him being a recipient of Shigeo Shingo Prize for Manufacturing Excellence and is a fellow of the Strategic Management Society.

3. His university page might be considered by some as a primary source for the information of his named chair. An acceptable source would be an announcement, even if it is from the university, but I haven't found any such link.

I am very sorry for such a long message. I have no intention of arguing. I am just trying to follow the best practices on Wikipedia in my work. Still if you think adding the university profile link to the opening sentence improves the article, please let me know and I will do so.

Again, very sorry for the long message. And thank you for your guidance. HRShami (talk) HRShami (talk) 07:01, 8 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for this belated reply.

You raise thoughtful points, no need to apologise.

1. Yes that's true, but my understanding is that is flexible. In any event, I agree with where you've placed the citation now.

2. I agree but adding the UCLA professorship position only helps.

3. I appreciate your conservatism. In my experience citing a professor's university webpage is entirely appropriate.

In light of this, you will be pleased to see I have accepted the draft into mainspace.

Another well drafted article, well done. Cabrils (talk) 06:29, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I will keep these points mind moving forward. Thanks a lot! HRShami (talk) HRShami (talk) 09:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cabrils, last year you invited this draft's editors to leave a note here, which is why I would like to inform you the draft has been updated with additional independent secondary coverage, WP:NACTOR clarification, including the recent Critics Choice Association anouncement. See also the article draft's Talk page. A re-review would be appreciated. Thank you. Tartigradesinspace (talk) 20:55, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tartigradesinspace,

Thanks for the ping. Please see my response on the Draft's Talk page, where further discussion is placed placed to occur. Thanks. Cabrils (talk) 22:48, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cabrils,

I have re-submitted the draft, and wanted to let you know as promised. Thank you for your help with this!

As our previous conversation was archived, I've copied it below for reference.

Hi Carbils. Thank you for your detailed feedback on the draft Draft:Perniclas Bedow. I have now added more reliable, secondary sources. I believe this subject meets WP:CREATIVE criteria #1, because their work has been the subject of multiple independent features in respected international design publications (Slanted, Creative Review, It's Nice That) and recognized by leading design institutions including D&AD and Cannes Lions.

The three best sources that establish notability:

1. Blake, Vicky (2022-07-14). "Slanted in Stockholm: Bedow - Slanted Magazine #39". slanted. Retrieved 2025-12-19.

5. "Graphic Design: Bedow create an identity that can be used as a board game". www.itsnicethat.com. Retrieved 2025-05-09.

8. Woodward, Adam (2025-09-08). "Sweden's sporting icons get typographic postage stamp tribute". Creative Review. Retrieved 2025-12-19. Pilkie02 (talk) 16:47, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pilkie02,

Thanks for the information.

On balance I agree the draft is "unlikely to be deleted in mainspace" (see WP:AFCR), and meets WP:CREATIVE. For example, [this article] reports in some detail on a set of stamps designed by the subject that was commissioned by "PostNord, the largest postal service in the Nordic countries".

If you care to re-submit the draft, please notify me here, and I would be happy to accept it into mainspace.

Cabrils (talk) 04:50, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pilkie02 (talk) 16:58, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pilkie02,

Thanks for the ping. I've just looked at the draft and it has not actually been resubmitted, so please feel free to do that and notify me here and I'd be happy to accept it. Cabrils (talk) 22:30, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cabrils,

Thank you, it has been re-submitted now. Pilkie02 (talk) 12:25, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Pilkie02, draft accepted in mainspace. Good work. Cabrils (talk) 02:34, 21 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Cabrils

I was wondering about the multiple issues box at the top of this article for Anthony V. Lupo. There have been some updates made by other editors and I was wondering if you think the article has made enough changes to take the box away from the top of the article?

Thank you Ggevaart1 (talk) 21:04, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ggevaart1,

Thanks for the ping. I see we have discussed the page previously on your Talk page.

I have replied on the article's Talk page and tagged you there. That is the best place for any further discussion to occur (please just tag me there). Thanks. Cabrils (talk) 04:40, 18 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your earlier review of my draft.

I have now revised the article to address your feedback. I have removed weaker sources, improved the tone to ensure it is neutral, and relied on independent coverage from BBC News, ITV News, WalesOnline (multiple articles), and The Independent.

I believe the draft now better demonstrates notability under WP:GNG.

If you have a moment, I would really appreciate it if you could take another look.

Thanks very much for your time. EdwardHopkinsPR (talk) 07:52, 18 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the draft meets WP:GNG, as the subject has received significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources, including BBC News, ITV News, WalesOnline (multiple articles), and The Independent.

These sources are independent of the subject and provide coverage across different contexts, including his early social media activity, campaign work, and public appearances, rather than routine mentions.

I also believe the draft meets WP:ANYBIO criterion #1, as the subject has been the focus of multiple published works in reliable sources (including ITV News and WalesOnline feature-style articles) that provide biographical detail. EdwardHopkinsPR (talk) 07:55, 18 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @EdwardHopkinsPR, thanks for the ping. Please see my response on the draft's Talk page, where further discussion is best placed to occur. Thanks. Cabrils (talk) 02:54, 21 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cabrils! Thanks a lot for your feedback.

I went ahead and tried my best to address all your comments regarding my initial draft for Crozier Fine Arts. I rewrote the draft in a more neutral, encyclopedia-style tone and removed most of the language that could be interpreted as promotional or informal. I also adjusted the structure so it relies more on verifiable facts, acquisitions, and independently reported industry developments instead of descriptive marketing language (I hope). The strongest sources I probably added were articles from The New York Times, Barron and ICE (government website).

I think the page now meets WP:NCORP criteria #3, because Crozier has received significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The strongest evidence toward WP #3 would be:

• The New York Times coverage of private art-storage infrastructure;
• The Art Newspaper reporting on consolidation in the art logistics sector;
• ARTnews coverage of acquisitions and market positioning;
• Barron’s discussion of sustainability practices involving art transportation.

Thanks in advance Sebarod8913 (talk) 15:31, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sebarod8913, thanks for the ping.

As I requested in my original comment on the draft, "if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid or being the subject, you must declare that on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please see WP:COI and/or WP:PAID). In instances of a conflict of interest, the review of the page needs to be handled with care, mindful of the higher bar set by pages produced in circumstances of such a conflict. Such pages typically may read too much like a promotional CV or advertorial (see WP:PROMO), which Wikipedia is not; and/or contain prose that is not of a standard appropriate for an encyclopaedia (also see WP:PEACOCK and WP:NPV)."

Thanks in advance. Cabrils (talk) 21:22, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again @Cabrils!

Already added a proper disclosure on my Talk page as previously requested in your original comment. I hope it follows all the guidelines needed this time. Sebarod8913 (talk) 19:34, 4 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sebarod8913,

Thanks for the ping. Please see my response on the draft's Talk page, where further discussion is best placed to occur. Thanks. Cabrils (talk) 01:05, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cabrils. I hope you are doing well. Can you please take a look at this draft when you have time? Another editor was working on it earlier, so please disregard the two earlier LLM-based declines. The last decline, after I reworked and submitted the article, was based on notability. However, I believe he meets the notability criteria. My complete rationale for notability is here. I feel like the reviewer who declined the article is still not convinced of his notability, so I reached out to you for an opinion. Thank you. HRShami (talk) 07:34, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HRShami,

Apologies for such a belated reply.

I don't think I can assist with this draft. Cabrils (talk) 05:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No worries about the delayed response. Do you also think he does not meet the NPROF guideline? HRShami (talk) 05:07, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Cabrils. Thanks for patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to read the new tutorial for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! ~2026-14944-70 (talk) 01:39, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @~2026-14944-70, OK thanks very much and apologies for the unnecessary extra work I created! Cabrils (talk) 02:02, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

All good. Just remember to only tag pages for speedy deletion if all revisions in the history are eligible under the given criterion. ~2026-14944-70 (talk) 02:04, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Understood! Cabrils (talk) 03:36, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I'd love you assistance in taking another look at this draft. I don't have any relation to the company just a journalist by trade. I am unsure on how to adjust the reference section, I have added another citation in there. Any further tips on how to get this in for approval would be beneficial. SilverSkyEditor (talk) 15:39, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the ping.

Contrary to your claim that you "don't have any relation to the company just a journalist by trade", your comment on the draft's Talk page shows extremely poor sentence construction and grammar, so I find your claim that you are a journalist by trade difficult to believe. I think it is much more likely that you are being paid by the subject to create a page here for them for publicity purposes. Please see my response on the draft's Talk page. Cabrils (talk) 01:13, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for reviewing Draft:Good Store, and for offering to reassess. A new source was recently published that helps to establish notability of the organization. I have listed the three best sources on the Talk page with justification for why they meet WP:NCORP.

When you are able, I would appreciate your reassessment. Thanks for your time! Powzawow (talk) 21:33, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Powzawow, thanks for the ping.

Apologies for this belated reply.

Before progressing, could you please address whether you have a conflict of interest? Thanks. Cabrils (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cabrils, no problem. I do not have a conflict of interest with the company. I am just a viewer of the founders' YouTube channel and have followed their work over the years. I have added this the article's Talk page. Powzawow (talk) 15:38, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Powzawow,

Again, apologies for such a tardy reply.

Thank you for clarifying your lack of COI.

On balance I agree the draft is now "unlikely to be deleted in mainspace” (see WP:AFCR), and meets WP:NCORP. I am in the process of accepting it into mainspace but first need the existing page Good Store (which is a redirect) to be deleted, which should occur fairly promptly. Cabrils (talk) 01:30, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thanks very much! Powzawow (talk) 03:10, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draft page is now accepted into main space. Nice work. Cabrils (talk) 22:31, 18 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cabrils,

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Cabrils. Thank you very much for your feedback on the David Bertok draft and the offer that I can contact you about this again. I have revised the article to address your concerns. I removed all promotional language, focused on NPOV, and added independent secondary sources, including his official 2025 Primetime Emmy Award recognition and the German Chart placements for his work with Subsignal. I also disclosed my personal connection on the draft's talk page. If you can find the time, could you please take another look at the draft? Eisteeforever (talk) 08:38, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Eisteeforever,

Apologies for such a belated reply.

On balance I agree the draft likely meets WP:MUSICBIO criteria #2 (National chart success with Subsignal's 'Touchstones'), #4 (2025 Primetime Emmy Award win), and #5 (Composed for notable media including Netflix's 'Chef's Table'), and as such is now "unlikely to be deleted in mainspace” (see WP:AFCR). Accordingly, if you care to re-submit the draft, please notify me here, and I would be happy to accept it into mainspace. Cabrils (talk) 23:02, 18 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cabrils, Wonderful to hear. I just resubmitted. Thank you! Eisteeforever (talk) 10:12, 19 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cabrils, Wonderful to hear. I resubmitted. (Sorry for double message–had not formatted properly) Thank you! Eisteeforever (talk) 10:12, 19 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Eisteeforever Article accepted into main space. Well done. Cabrils (talk) 08:09, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition of Cabrils for accumulating at least 10 points in the May 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 14884 articles during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 15:58, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Reviewer, Thank you for reviewing my draft article, Draft: Khalid Ghanem. I would like to respectfully provide additional sources that have been added to the draft. I have spent several years improving this article and recently added multiple independent Moroccan and Chinese media sources covering my acting career and work in Chinese film and television. Independent media coverage: https://lopinion.ma/fr/culture/khalid-ghanem—la-cooperation-cinematographique-entre-le-maroc-et-la-chine-est-fructueuse-_a83097 https://aujourdhui.ma/culture/khalid-ghanem-une-star-marocaine-qui-brille-dans-lempire-du-milieu https://article19.ma/accueil/archives/139266 https://alyaoum24.com/1494584.html https://m.163.com/dy/article/H9QM9DHU0552XKVS.html https://www.52hrtt.com/mobileview/news/F1776136302643.html https://m.mnw.cn/quanzhou/luojiang/3089732.html Additional filmography and profile databases: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm13525482/ https://mbd.baidu.com/ma/s/zMcYVMoq These sources cover my acting career, appearances in Chinese productions, and recent projects including my role as Ibn Battuta in the historical drama Wind Rises in Tongcheng. If the draft still does not meet Wikipedia’s notability requirements, I would greatly appreciate any specific guidance regarding what additional independent sources or improvements may be required. Thank you very much for your time and volunteer work. Kind regards, Khalid Ghanem ~2026-35529-98 (talk) 16:39, 18 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. OK, thanks for this information. There are numerous issues here.

You need to thoroughly read my comment on the draft because in it I include numerous links and a lot of helpful advice. You need to create a User Page. You need to declare your Conflict of Interest as the subject of the draft. You should post your note above onto the Talk page of the Draft so it is clearly visible to all reviewers. Then you need to re-read my comment again and follow the suggestions and instructions there please. Cabrils (talk) 22:38, 18 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cabrils,

Thank you for your guidance.

I have now created a registered account named "KhalidGhanemActor", created my user page, and declared my conflict of interest as the subject of Draft:Khalid Ghanem.

I have carefully reviewed your comments and added additional independent Moroccan and Chinese media sources to the draft.

I would be grateful if you could take another look when you have time and advise whether any further improvements are needed.

Thank you very much for your time and assistance.

Kind regards,

Khalid Ghanem KhalidGhanemActor (talk) 01:45, 19 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@KhalidGhanemActor, please provide WP:THREE as requested in my comment on the draft. Note this should be done on the Draft's Talk page, where any further discussion is best placed to occur. Cabrils (talk) 02:08, 19 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cabrils,

Per your request regarding WP:THREE, I would like to identify four independent sources that I believe provide significant coverage of the subject:

L’Opinion (Morocco)

https://lopinion.ma/fr/culture/khalid-ghanem—la-cooperation-cinematographique-entre-le-maroc-et-la-chine-est-fructueuse-_a83097

Aujourd’hui Le Maroc

https://aujourdhui.ma/culture/khalid-ghanem-une-star-marocaine-qui-brille-dans-lempire-du-milieu

Alqahera News (Egypt)

https://alqaheranews.net/news/11867/خالد-غانم-ممثل-مغربي-في-الصين-يحلم-بتجسيد-شخصية-عربية-شهيرة

MNN News (China)

https://m.mnw.cn/quanzhou/luojiang/3089732.html

Thank you for taking the time to review these sources.

Kind regards,

Khalid Ghanem KhalidGhanemActor (talk) 04:57, 19 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]