Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jun 20, 2026

N conjecture

In number theory, the n conjecture is a conjecture stated by Browkin & Brzeziński (1994) as a generalization of the abc conjecture to more than three integers.

Last revised
Jun 20, 2026
Read time
≈ 4 min
Length
952 w
Citations
Source

In number theory, the n conjecture is a conjecture stated by Browkin & Brzeziński (1994) as a generalization of the abc conjecture to more than three integers.

Formulations

Given n 3 {\displaystyle n\geq 3} , let a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n Z {\displaystyle a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{n}\in \mathbb {Z} } satisfy three conditions:

(i) gcd ( a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n ) = 1 {\displaystyle \gcd(a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{n})=1}
(ii) a 1 + a 2 + . . . + a n = 0 {\displaystyle a_{1}+a_{2}+...+a_{n}=0}
(iii) no proper subsum of a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n {\displaystyle a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{n}} equals 0 {\displaystyle 0}

First formulation

The n conjecture states that for every ε > 0 {\displaystyle \varepsilon >0} , there is a constant C {\displaystyle C} depending on n {\displaystyle n} and ε {\displaystyle \varepsilon } , such that:

max ( | a 1 | , | a 2 | , . . . , | a n | ) < C n , ε rad ( | a 1 | | a 2 | | a n | ) 2 n 5 + ε {\displaystyle \operatorname {max} (|a_{1}|,|a_{2}|,...,|a_{n}|)<C_{n,\varepsilon }\operatorname {rad} (|a_{1}|\cdot |a_{2}|\cdot \ldots \cdot |a_{n}|)^{2n-5+\varepsilon }}

where rad ( m ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {rad} (m)} denotes the radical of an integer m {\displaystyle m} , defined as the product of the distinct prime factors of m {\displaystyle m} .

Second formulation

Define the quality of a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n {\displaystyle a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{n}} as

q ( a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n ) = log ( max ( | a 1 | , | a 2 | , . . . , | a n | ) ) log ( rad ( | a 1 | | a 2 | . . . | a n | ) ) {\displaystyle q(a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{n})={\frac {\log(\operatorname {max} (|a_{1}|,|a_{2}|,...,|a_{n}|))}{\log(\operatorname {rad} (|a_{1}|\cdot |a_{2}|\cdot ...\cdot |a_{n}|))}}}

The n conjecture states that lim sup q ( a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n ) = 2 n 5 {\displaystyle \limsup q(a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{n})=2n-5} .

Stronger form

Vojta (1998) proposed a stronger variant of the n conjecture, where setwise coprimeness of a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n {\displaystyle a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{n}} is replaced by pairwise coprimeness of a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n {\displaystyle a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{n}} .

There are two different formulations of this strong n conjecture.

Given n 3 {\displaystyle n\geq 3} , let a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n Z {\displaystyle a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{n}\in \mathbb {Z} } satisfy three conditions:

(i) a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n {\displaystyle a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{n}} are pairwise coprime
(ii) a 1 + a 2 + . . . + a n = 0 {\displaystyle a_{1}+a_{2}+...+a_{n}=0}
(iii) no proper subsum of a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n {\displaystyle a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{n}} equals 0 {\displaystyle 0}

First formulation

The strong n conjecture states that for every ε > 0 {\displaystyle \varepsilon >0} , there is a constant C {\displaystyle C} depending on n {\displaystyle n} and ε {\displaystyle \varepsilon } , such that:

max ( | a 1 | , | a 2 | , . . . , | a n | ) < C n , ε rad ( | a 1 | | a 2 | | a n | ) 1 + ε {\displaystyle \operatorname {max} (|a_{1}|,|a_{2}|,...,|a_{n}|)<C_{n,\varepsilon }\operatorname {rad} (|a_{1}|\cdot |a_{2}|\cdot \ldots \cdot |a_{n}|)^{1+\varepsilon }}

Second formulation

Define the quality of a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n {\displaystyle a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{n}} as

q ( a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n ) = log ( max ( | a 1 | , | a 2 | , . . . , | a n | ) ) log ( rad ( | a 1 | | a 2 | . . . | a n | ) ) {\displaystyle q(a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{n})={\frac {\log(\operatorname {max} (|a_{1}|,|a_{2}|,...,|a_{n}|))}{\log(\operatorname {rad} (|a_{1}|\cdot |a_{2}|\cdot ...\cdot |a_{n}|))}}}

The strong n conjecture states that lim sup q ( a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n ) = 1 {\displaystyle \limsup q(a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{n})=1} .

Hölzl, Kleine and Stephan (2025) harvtxt error: no target: CITEREFHölzl,_Kleine_and_Stephan2025 (help) have shown that for n 5 {\displaystyle n\geq 5} the above limit superior is for odd n {\displaystyle n} at least 5 / 3 {\displaystyle 5/3} and for even n {\displaystyle n} is at least 5 / 4 {\displaystyle 5/4} . For the cases n = 3 {\displaystyle n=3} (abc-conjecture) and n = 4 {\displaystyle n=4} , they did not find any nontrivial lower bounds. It is also open whether there is a common constant upper bound above the limit superiors for all n 3 {\displaystyle n\geq 3} . For the exact status of the case n = 3 {\displaystyle n=3} see the article on the abc conjecture.

References

References