Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised May 28, 2026

Modal share

A modal share is the percentage of travelers using a particular type of transportation or number of trips using said type. In freight transportation, this may be measured in mass.

Last revised
May 28, 2026
Read time
≈ 16 min
Length
3,569 w
Citations
131
Source
United Kingdom transport modal share from 1952 to 2014, Department for Transport source ↗

A modal share (also called mode split, mode-share, or modal split) is the percentage of travelers using a particular type of transportation or number of trips using said type.1 In freight transportation, this may be measured in mass.

Modal share is an important component in developing sustainable transport within a city or region. In recent years, many cities have set modal share targets for balanced and sustainable transport modes, particularly 30% of non-motorized (cycling and walking) and 30% of public transport. These goals reflect a desire for a modal shift, or a change between modes, and usually encompasses an increase in the proportion of trips made using sustainable modes.2

Comparability of data

Modal share data is usually obtained by travel surveys, which are often conducted by local governments, using different methodologies. Sampling and interviewing techniques, definitions, the extent of geographical areas and other methodological differences can influence comparability. Most typical surveys refer to the main mode of transport used during trips to work.3 Surveys covering entire metropolitan areas are preferred over city proper surveys which typically cover only the denser inner city. As of 26 August 2025 the reference years in these lists span over two decades, making comparisons problematic, especially given changing population, new transportation infrastructure and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, among other factors.

The following tables present the modal split of journeys to work. It is better to use a measure of all trips on a typical weekday, but journey to work data is more readily available. It would also be beneficial to disaggregate private motor vehicles figures to car driver, car passengers and motorbikes (especially relevant for Asian cities).

Metropolitan areas with over 1,000,000 inhabitants

Metro area Walking Cycling Public transport Private motor vehicle Year Survey area Country
Australia Adelaide 3% 1% 11% 85% 20164 GCCSA Australia
United States Atlanta 1% 0% 3% 86% 20165 UA USA
Mexico Mexico City 1% 1% 71% 22% 20196 Mexico
Greece Athens 8% 2% 37% 53% 20067 Greece
New Zealand Auckland 5% 1% 12% 81% 20188 MUA New Zealand
United States Austin 2% 1% 3% 83% 20199 USA
United States Baltimore 3% 0% 7% 84% 201610 UA USA
Spain Barcelona 34.35% 2.28% 37.33% 26.04% 201811 Spain
China Beijing 21% 32% 26% 21% 2005/201112 China
Serbia Belgrade 23% 1% 49% 27% 2015 Serbia
Germany Berlin 34% 18% 26% 22% 202313 Germany
Australia Brisbane 4% 1% 14% 81% 201614 GCCSA Australia
Belgium Brussels 36% 9% 24% 29% 202215 Belgium
Colombia Bogotá 24% 7% 43% 15% 201912 Colombia
United States Boston 5% 1% 14% 73% 201616 UA USA
Romania Bucharest 31% 2% 27% 36% 201517 Other (taxi): 4% Romania
Hungary Budapest 32% 1% 47% 20% 2011 Hungary
Canada Calgary 4% 1% 8% 84% 2021 18 CMA Canada
United States Chicago 7.1% 1.8% 20.5% 51% 202419 USA
Germany Cologne 25% 19% 21% 35% 201720 Germany
United States Dallas 1% 0% 2% 90% 201621 UA USA
South Korea Daejeon 26% 2% 28% 44% 201222 South Korea
India Delhi 21% 12% 48% 19% 2008/201112 India
United States Detroit 1% 0% 2% 92% 201623 USA
United States Denver 2% 1% 4% 81% 202024 UA USA
Bangladesh Dhaka 19% 39% 29% 13% 200925 Bangladesh
Republic of Ireland Dublin 18% 7% 15% 59% 202026 Ireland
Canada Edmonton 3% 1% 6% 87% 2021 27 CMA Canada
China Guangzhou 35% 19% 22% 23% 20212829 China
Germany Hamburg 22% 22% 24% 32% 202230 Germany
Finland Helsinki 10.99% 9.34% 32.42% 46% 201631 MA, Other: 0.5% Finland
Hong Kong Hong Kong 11% 0.5% 77% 12% 201132 China
United States Houston 1% 0% 2% 91% 201633 UA USA
United States Indianapolis 1% 0% 1% 91% 201634 UA USA
Indonesia Jakarta 1% 0.2% 20% 78%* 201935 UA *67% motorbike Indonesia
Malaysia Kuala Lumpur 0.5% 0.5% 21% 78% 201836 Malaysia
United States Las Vegas 1% 0% 4% 90% 201637 UA USA
United Kingdom London 26% 2.5% 44.5% 27% 202038 UK
United States Los Angeles 3% 1% 5% 85% 201639 UA USA
Spain Madrid 34% 0.5% 25% 40% 201840 Spain
Philippines Manila 9% 2% 44% 45% 201912 Philippines
Australia Melbourne 4% 2% 19% 76% 201614 GCCSA Australia
United States Miami 2% 1% 4% 87% 201641 UA USA
Italy Milan 18% 10% 41% 29% 201442 Italy
Belarus Minsk 13% 1% 63% 20% 201643 Belarus
Canada Montreal 5% 2% 22% 70% 201644 CMA Canada
India Mumbai 27% 6% 52% 15% 2008/201112 India
Germany Munich 33% 21% 22% 24% 202345 Germany
Japan Nagoya 15% 13% 30% 43% 201146 Japan
United States New York City 30.7% 1.1% 32.1% 30.2% 201947 UA USA
Japan Osaka 7% 19% 61% 13% 201048 Japan
Canada Ottawa 8% 2% 18% 72% 201649 CMA Canada
France Paris 40% 2% 22% 34% 202050 Parisiens France
Australia Perth 3% 1% 12% 84% 201614 GCCSA Australia
United States Philadelphia 4% 1% 10% 80% 201651 UA USA
United States Phoenix 2% 1% 2% 87% 201652 UA USA
United States Portland 3% 3% 7% 78% 201653 UA USA
Czech Republic Prague 35% 1% 37% 25% 202154 Czech Republic
Brazil Rio de Janeiro 29% 3% 43% 25% 201255 UA Brazil
Italy Rome 4% 1% 29% 66% 201456 Italy
United States San Antonio 2% 0% 3% 90% 201657 UA USA
United States San Diego 3% 1% 3% 85% 201658 UA USA
United States San Francisco 5% 2% 20% 64% 201659 UA USA
United States San Jose 2% 2% 5% 84% 201660 UA USA
Chile Santiago 34.5% 4% 29.6% 25.7% 201261 UA Chile
Brazil São Paulo 32% 1% 36% 31% 201762 UA Brazil
United States Seattle 4% 1% 10% 77% 201663 UA USA
South Korea Seoul N/A 4% 66% 23% 201464 South Korea
China Shanghai 27% 20% 33% 20% 2009/201112 China
Singapore Singapore 22% 1% 44% 33% 201112 Singapore
Bulgaria Sofia N/A N/A 73%a 27% 201065 Bulgaria
Sweden Stockholm 14% 7% 47% 32% 201166 Sweden
Australia Sydney 5% 1% 27% 65% 202067 Deloitte Australia
Taiwan Taipei 13% 4% 43% 40% 201668 Taiwan
Israel Tel Aviv 8.2% 4.3% 17.7% 62.5% 202269 Israel
Japan Tokyo 23% 14% 51% 12% 2008/200912 Japan
Canada Toronto 5% 1% 16% 76% 202170 CMA Canada
Canada Vancouver 6% 2% 15% 75% 202171 CMA Canada
Austria Vienna 30% 11% 34% 25% 202472 Austria
Poland Warsaw 18% 3% 47% 32% 201573 Poland
United States Washington, D.C. 3% 1% 6% 56% 202274 UA USA

Metropolitan areas with over 250,000 inhabitants

Metro area walking cycling public transport private motor vehicle year
Denmark Aarhus 7% 27% 19% 43% 2004
Spain Alicante 18% 0% 13% 69% 2004
Netherlands Amsterdam 5% 30% 19% 42% 202075
Italy Bari 13% 1% 14% 72% 2001
Switzerland Basel 33% 17% 27% 22% 201576
Switzerland Bern 30% 15% 32% 22% 201576
Spain Bilbao 68.1% 0.9% 19.6% 11.1% 202177
United Kingdom Birmingham 1% 1% 25% 66% 2001
Italy Bologna 8% 4% 21% 67% 2001
Germany Bonn 28% 15% 17% 41% 201778
Slovakia Bratislava 26.7% 1.6% 32.6% 37.7% 201479
Czech Republic Brno 5% 2% 57% 32% 201280
United States Buffalo 6% 1% 14% 79% 2012
Germany Bremen 25% 25% 15% 36% 2018
United Kingdom Bristol 19% 8% 12% 55% 201181
Australia Canberra 5% 3% 8% 85% 201614
New Zealand Christchurch 4% 6% 5% 84% 20188
Denmark Copenhagen 30% 26% 18% 26% 202182
Spain Córdoba 18% 1% 10% 71% 2004
Germany Dortmund 19% 10% 22% 49% 2019
Germany Dresden 26% 18% 20% 36% 2018
Republic of Ireland Dublin 13.2% 7.6% 21.5% 48.5% 201683
Germany Düsseldorf 34% 13% 18% 35% 201784
United Kingdom Edinburgh 19% 7% 30% 42% 2009–201085
Netherlands Eindhoven 3% 24% 8% 65% 2004
Germany Essen 19% 7% 19% 55% 2019
Italy Florence 8% 4% 21% 69% 2001
Germany Frankfurt 11% 15% 30% 44% 2015
Germany Freiburg im Breisgau 29% 34% 16% 21% 2017
Belgium Gent 15.6% 33.8% 11.2% 39% 202186
Poland Gdańsk 20.8% 5.9% 32.1% 41.2% 201687
Spain Gijón 24% 0% 17% 59% 2004
Sweden Gothenburg 12% 14% 21% 52% 2004
Austria Graz 19% 19% 20% 42% 201888
Netherlands The Hague 5% 22% 30% 43% 2004
Canada Halifax 8% 1% 12% 78% 201689
Canada Hamilton 4% 1% 10% 84% 201690
Germany Hanover 26% 19% 19% 36% 2017
Poland Kraków 28.4% 1.2% 36.3% 33.7% 2013
Spain Las Palmas 15% 0.42% 13% 68% 201191
Portugal Lisbon 15.6% 2.5% 30.8% 50.2% 202092
Spain Málaga 12% 0% 11% 77% 2004
Sweden Malmö 14% 26% 25% 34% 201893
Spain Murcia 18% 1% 7% 74% 2004
Italy Naples 13% 0% 26% 60% 2001
Germany Nuremberg 30% 15% 23% 32% 202394
Norway Oslo 32% 6% 31% 29% 202295
Italy Palermo 12% 1% 9% 78% 2001
Spain Pamplona 42% 2% 13% 41% 201396
Poland Poznań 20.6% 8.4% 33.7% 37.3% 2019
Canada Quebec City 2% 6% 11% 80% 201697
Netherlands Rotterdam 5% 14% 25% 56% 2004
Spain Seville 13% 7% 18% 62% 2014
Germany Stuttgart 29% 8% 23% 40% 201798
Estonia Tallinn 14% 2% 34% 49% 202099
Finland Tampere 10% 10% 14% 66% 2021100
Italy Turin 12% 3% 5% 79% 2004
Netherlands Utrecht 25.3% 48.4% 5.4% 18.7% 2018101
Spain Valencia 16% 1% 21% 62% 2004
Spain Valladolid 22% 1% 20% 57% 2004
Spain Vigo 19% 0% 13% 68% 2004
Lithuania Vilnius 36% 0% 26% 38% 2011102
Spain Vitoria-Gasteiz 45.6% 8.0% 9.5% 35.5% 2021103
New Zealand Wellington 21% 4% 23% 49% 20188
Canada Victoria (CMA) 10% 7% 11% 70% 2016
Canada Winnipeg 5% 2% 14% 79% 2016104
Poland Wrocław 24.2% 6.3% 27.6% 41.4% 2018
Spain Zaragoza 45.91% 2.90% 23.71% 26.88% 2017105
Switzerland Zürich 33% 12% 32% 21% 201576
Mean ± SD 13±8% 8±9% 24±13% 55±17%

Notes: European data is based on the Urban Audit106

The Charter of Brussels, signed by 36 cities including Brussels, Ghent, Milan, Munich, Seville, Edinburgh, Toulouse, Bordeaux, Gdansk, and Timișoara, commits the signatories to achieve at least 15% of bicycling modal share by 2020, and calls upon European institutions to do likewise.107 The cycling modal share is strongly associated with the size of local cycling infrastructure.108

The Canadian city of Hamilton adopted a similar modal share target plan in 2005.109

The modal share differs considerably depending on each city in the developing world.110111112

According to UNECE, the global on-road vehicle fleet is to double by 2050 (from 1,2 billion to 2,5 billion,113 see introduction), with most future car purchases taking place in developing countries. Some experts even mention that the number of vehicles in developing countries will increase by 4 or 5-fold by 2050 (compared to current car use levels), and that the majority of these will be second-hand.14114

Legislation impacting the modal share

Legislation can discourage car ownership through, for example, taxation and conditions on new car purchases). This could help in achieving a modal shift.115

See also

See also

Notes

Notes

  1. Result achieved using the percentage of commuters using PT (63%) plus Taxi (3%) and additionally marshrutkas (7%).
External links
References

References

  1. Glossary (Engineering Services – Transportation, City of Vancouver website. Accessed 2009-06-04.) Archived June 3, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  2. "Page cannot be found - Ramblers". www.ramblers.org.uk. Archived from the original on 2016-03-07. Retrieved 2021-08-31.
  3. "Singapore Land and Transport Authority: Journeys, issue 7, November 2011" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-14. Retrieved 2014-07-11.
  4. "Trends in journey to work mode shares in Australian cities to 2016 (second edition)". Charting Transport. 2017-10-24. Archived from the original on 2018-07-19. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  5. "Census profile: Atlanta, GA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  6. "Deloitte City Mobility Index: Mexico City" (PDF). Deloitte Insights.
  7. "TEMS - the EPOMM Modal Split Tool". Archived from the original on 2016-08-22. Retrieved 2016-08-12.
  8. "Main means of travel to work by age group and sex, for the employed census usually resident population count aged 15 years and over, 2018 Census". nzdotstat.stats.govt.nz. Retrieved 2022-05-18.
  9. "Census profile: Austin, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2022-03-07.
  10. "Census profile: Baltimore, MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  11. "Pla de Mobilitat Urbana 2024" (PDF). Retrieved 2022-07-04.
  12. "From Transmilenio to Cycle Networks Lessons Learned from Bogotá's Comprehensive Urban Mobility Planning" (PDF). mobilize.itdp.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 March 2025. Retrieved 20 May 2025.
  13. ""Mobilität in Städten – System repräsentativer Verkehrsbefragungen (SRV) 2023" – Mobilitätsdaten für Berlin auch bezirksweise - Berlin.de". 4 June 2025.
  14. Charting Transport Archived 2017-10-26 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 27 October 2017
  15. "Brusselaar fietst meer en rijdt minder met de auto". 23 May 2023.
  16. "Census profile: Boston, MA--NH--RI Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  17. "IMAGE: Bucharest estimated modal share 2015. Source: Bucharest SUMP" – via ResearchGate.
  18. Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics (2022-03-29). "Census Profile, 2021 Census of Population". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2023-10-17.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  19. U.S. Census Bureau. "Commuting Characteristics by Sex". American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S0801. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2026-02-03.
  20. Klein, Benjamin. "Mobilität in Köln" (PDF). mobilitaet-in-deutschland.de. City of Cologne. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-07-12. Retrieved 2022-07-12.
  21. "Census profile: Dallas--Fort Worth--Arlington, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  22. [KOTI, "2013 National Transportation DB Report" 2013], retrieved 2013-12-31
  23. "Census profile: Detroit, MI Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  24. "Census profile: Denver--Aurora, CO Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  25. "Dhaka Urban Transport Network Development Study" (PDF). Japan International Cooperation Agency. March 2010. Retrieved 2022-05-16.
  26. "Deloitte City Mobility Index 2020" (PDF). Deloitte Insights. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-06-07. Retrieved 2021-06-07.
  27. Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics (2022-03-29). "Census Profile, 2021 Census of Population". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2023-10-17.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  28. "Green Mobility and Carbon Emissions in Chinese Cities" (PDF).
  29. "Guangzhou Transport Development Annual Report 2021" (PDF).
  30. "68 Prozent aller Wege wurden 2022 im Umweltverbund absolviert".
  31. "Page 18: Kulkutapojen käyttö matkan tarkoituksen mukaan vuositasolla" (PDF). Retrieved 2023-04-05.
  32. "Transport Department - Travel Characteristics Survey 2011 - Final Report *Free copy can only be downloaded from this website". www.td.gov.hk. Archived from the original on 2020-11-05. Retrieved 2020-11-02.
  33. "Census profile: Houston, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  34. "Census profile: Indianapolis, IN Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  35. "Badan Pusat Statistik". www.bps.go.id. Archived from the original on 2020-09-28. Retrieved 2020-02-06.
  36. BERNAMA (2021-10-11). "- Kuala Lumpur As Enhanced Liveability Model City". BERNAMA. Retrieved 2025-02-03.
  37. "Census profile: Las Vegas--Henderson, NV Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  38. "Transport Statistics Great Britain 2020" (PDF). London: Department for Transport – via GOV.uk.
  39. "Census profile: Los Angeles--Long Beach--Anaheim, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  40. "Encuesta de movilidad de la Comunidad de Madrid 2018 - Documento de síntesis" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-12-01. Retrieved 2020-06-02.
  41. "Census profile: Miami, FL Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  42. "Piano Urbano per la Mobilità Sostenibile (PUMS) della Città metropolitana di Milano" (PDF). cittametropolitana.mi.it. Città metropolitana di Milano. p. 150. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
  43. "Опрос: минчане добираются до работы или учебы примерно за полчаса". TUT.BY. Archived from the original on 2016-09-22. Retrieved 2016-09-22.
  44. Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census – Montréal [Census metropolitan area], Quebec and Quebec [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2018-04-16.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  45. "Mobilitätssteckbrief für München" (PDF). München Unterwegs. 2025.
  46. 代表交通手段割合|名古屋市の交通の現状|交通まちづくり (in Japanese). City of Nagoya. Retrieved 13 May 2023.
  47. "Mobility Report" (PDF). NYC Department of Transportation. 2019.
  48. "大阪市における人の動き:平成 22 年 第5回近畿圏パーソントリップ調査集計結果から" (PDF). 第5回パーソントリップ調査. Osaka City Hall. p. 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 June 2021. Retrieved 7 April 2021.
  49. Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census – Ottawa – Gatineau [Census metropolitan area], Ontario/Quebec and Ontario [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2018-04-16.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  50. "Diagnostic du Plan Local de Mobilité" (PDF). p. 11. Retrieved 2025-03-24.
  51. "Census profile: Philadelphia, PA--NJ--DE--MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  52. "Census profile: Phoenix--Mesa, AZ Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  53. "Census profile: Portland, OR--WA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  54. Ročenka dopravy 2021 (PDF) (in Czech). Prague: Technická správa komunikací hl. m. Prahy, a.s. 2022. p. 19.
  55. "Page 41 in Monografia UFRJ 2015" (PDF). João Victor Costa. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-12-04. Retrieved 2020-05-15.
  56. FGM-AMOR. "ENDURANCE :: Countries/Cities". www.epomm.eu. Archived from the original on 2018-04-28. Retrieved 2018-04-27.
  57. "Census profile: San Antonio, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  58. "Census profile: San Diego, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  59. "Census profile: San Francisco--Oakland, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  60. "Census profile: San Jose, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  61. "Encuestas de Movilidad SECTRA". Retrieved 2021-11-17.
  62. "Page 39 in Pesquisa OD 2017". Metrô. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-06-06. Retrieved 2020-05-15.
  63. "Census profile: Seattle, WA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  64. "Public Transport in Seoul Metropolitan – K-Developedia" (PDF). K Developedia. 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 January 2021. Retrieved 16 August 2019.
  65. "The World Bank | Fare Collection Systems - Sofia, Bulgaria". www.ssatp.org. Archived from the original on 2021-08-13. Retrieved 2021-08-13.
  66. Koglin, Till (January 2018). "Urban Velomobility and the Spatial Problems of Cycling". Experiencing Networked Urban Mobilities. Routledge. pp. 112–118. doi:10.4324/9781315200255-20. ISBN 978-1-315-20025-5.
  67. "Deloitte City Mobility Index 2020" (PDF). Deloitte. 2020. Retrieved October 12, 2024.
  68. Taipei City Hall. "市政統計週報". Archived from the original on 20 October 2018. Retrieved 19 October 2018.
  69. "Census Data 2022". 2022.
  70. Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics (2022-03-29). "Census Profile, 2021 Census of Population". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2023-10-17.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  71. Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics (2023-03-29). "Census Profile, 2021 Census of Population". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2023-10-18.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  72. "Archivmeldung: Modal Split 2024: Weitere Zunahme bei Öffis und Radfahren, Zu-Fuß-Gehen nach wie vor auf Rekordniveau". Stadt Wien. 16 March 2025. Retrieved 2025-11-05., (German) retrieved2025-11-05
  73. [1] Archived 2016-08-17 at the Wayback Machine, (Polish) retrieved 2016-01-20
  74. "Census profile: Washington, DC--VA--MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2024-01-27. Retrieved 2024-01-27.
  75. "Amsterdam Global City Mobility Index 2020" (PDF).
  76. "Städtevergleich Mobilität Vergleichende Betrachtung der Städte Basel, Bern, Luzern, St.Gallen, Winterthur und Zürich im Jahr 2015" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-06-14. Retrieved 2020-06-14.
  77. Estudio de la Movilidad en la CAPV de 2021
  78. "Aktuelle Ergebnisse zur Alltagsmobilität" (PDF). agfs-nrw.de. 2019-02-21. Retrieved 2022-07-12.
  79. "Územný generel dopravy hl. mesta SR Bratislavy" (PDF). bratislava.sk (in Slovak). Centrum dopravního výzkumu, v.v.i. 2015-12-18.
  80. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-09-23. Retrieved 2017-09-02.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  81. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-24. Retrieved 2013-12-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  82. "Copenhagen Mobility" (PDF).
  83. "How We Travelled - CSO - Central Statistics Office". Archived from the original on 2019-11-15. Retrieved 2020-01-29.
  84. "Aktuelle Ergebnisse zur Alltagsmobilität" (PDF). agfs-nrw.de. 2019-02-21. Retrieved 2022-07-12.
  85. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2020-12-22.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  86. "Verplaatsingsgedrag van de Gentenaar in 2021 2021". Archived from the original on 2019-12-25. Retrieved 2023-10-23.
  87. "Gdańskie Badania Ruchu 2016". Archived from the original on 2017-10-20. Retrieved 2017-10-20.
  88. "Verkehrsmittelaufteilung - Modal Split". Archived from the original on 2020-10-01. Retrieved 2020-07-08.
  89. Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (2017-02-08). "Census Profile, 2016 Census - Halifax [Census metropolitan area], Nova Scotia and Nova Scotia [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2020-08-05.
  90. "Census Profile, 2016 Census - Hamilton [Census metropolitan area], Ontario and Ontario [Province]". Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2020-08-04.
  91. "Asistencia técnica para la elaboración de una estrategia de movilidad sostenible en el municipio de las palmas de gran canaria programa de actuaciones" (PDF). www.laspalmasgc.es. p. 142. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 January 2023.
  92. "Observatórios Lisboa".
  93. "Travel Habits of Residents". www.malmo.se. Archived from the original on 11 May 2021.
  94. "Mobilitätsfakten".
  95. "Overview of the current situation in Oslo" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 July 2024. Retrieved 20 May 2025.
  96. https://participartepmus.es/sites/default/files/diagnostico.pdf. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  97. Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (2017-02-08). "Census Profile, 2016 Census - Québec [Census metropolitan area], Quebec and Quebec [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2020-08-05.
  98. "Motorisierter Individualverkehr (MIV)".
  99. "Statistical Yearbook Of 2021". Tallinn City Government.
  100. "Henkilöliikennetutkimus 2021: Tampereen kaupunkiseutu" (PDF). Traficom.
  101. CBS. "Verplaatsingen in de gemeente Utrecht naar vervoerwijze, 2018" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-01-26. Retrieved 2020-12-14.
  102. Naujų transporto rūšių diegimo Vilniaus mieste specialusis planas Archived 2013-12-03 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 2013-07-03
  103. Estudio de la Movilidad en la CAPV de 2021
  104. Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census – Winnipeg [Census metropolitan area], Manitoba and Manitoba [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2018-04-16.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  105. "Revisión del plan de movilidad urbana sostenible Zaragoza" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2020.
  106. Urban Audit Archived 2009-02-06 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 2009-10-03
  107. Charter of Brussels Archived 2009-07-31 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 2009-10-03
  108. Mueller, N (2018). "Health impact assessment of cycling network expansions in European cities" (PDF). Preventive Medicine. 109: 62–70. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.011. hdl:10230/42143. PMID 29330030. S2CID 3774985.
  109. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-01-24. Retrieved 2019-01-23.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  110. "Figure 9.9 | Passenger transport modal shares of several cities in..." ResearchGate. Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2020-09-21.
  111. "Energy End Use Transport report".
  112. "How do people move around?" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-07-07. Retrieved 2020-09-21.
  113. "Used vehicle background overview" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-01-21. Retrieved 2020-09-21.
  114. "Regulation for 2nd hand vehicles" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-10-24. Retrieved 2020-09-21.
  115. "Green light for sustainable mobility". Archived from the original on 2020-10-24. Retrieved 2020-09-12.