Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised May 28, 2026

Implication graph

In mathematical logic and graph theory, an implication graph is a skew-symmetric, directed graph G = (V, E) composed of vertex set V and directed edge set E. Each vertex in V represents the truth status of a Boolean literal, and each directed edge from vertex u to vertex v represents the material implication "If the literal u is true then the literal v is also true". Implication graphs were originally used for analyzing complex Boolean expressions.

Last revised
May 28, 2026
Read time
≈ 2 min
Length
403 w
Citations
2
Source
An implication graph representing the 2-satisfiability instance ( x 0 x 2 ) ( x 0 ¬ x 3 ) ( x 1 ¬ x 3 ) ( x 1 ¬ x 4 ) ( x 2 ¬ x 4 ) ( x 0 ¬ x 5 ) ( x 1 ¬ x 5 ) ( x 2 ¬ x 5 ) ( x 3 x 6 ) ( x 4 x 6 ) ( x 5 x 6 ) . {\displaystyle \scriptscriptstyle (x_{0}\lor x_{2})\land (x_{0}\lor \lnot x_{3})\land (x_{1}\lor \lnot x_{3})\land (x_{1}\lor \lnot x_{4})\land (x_{2}\lor \lnot x_{4})\land {} \atop \quad \scriptscriptstyle (x_{0}\lor \lnot x_{5})\land (x_{1}\lor \lnot x_{5})\land (x_{2}\lor \lnot x_{5})\land (x_{3}\lor x_{6})\land (x_{4}\lor x_{6})\land (x_{5}\lor x_{6}).} source ↗

In mathematical logic and graph theory, an implication graph is a skew-symmetric, directed graph G = (V, E) composed of vertex set V and directed edge set E. Each vertex in V represents the truth status of a Boolean literal, and each directed edge from vertex u to vertex v represents the material implication "If the literal u is true then the literal v is also true". Implication graphs were originally used for analyzing complex Boolean expressions.

Applications

A 2-satisfiability instance in conjunctive normal form can be transformed into an implication graph by replacing each of its disjunctions by a pair of implications. For example, the statement ( x 0 x 1 ) {\displaystyle (x_{0}\lor x_{1})} can be rewritten as ( ¬ x 0 x 1 ) {\displaystyle (\neg x_{0}\rightarrow x_{1})} , but ( ¬ x 1 x 0 ) {\displaystyle (\neg x_{1}\rightarrow x_{0})} also works. An instance is satisfiable if and only if no literal and its negation belong to the same strongly connected component of its implication graph; this characterization can be used to solve 2-satisfiability instances in linear time.1

In CDCL SAT-solvers, unit propagation can be naturally associated with an implication graph that captures all possible ways of deriving all implied literals from decision literals,2 which is then used for clause learning.

References

References

  1. Aspvall, Bengt; Plass, Michael F.; Tarjan, Robert E. (1979). "A linear-time algorithm for testing the truth of certain quantified boolean formulas". Information Processing Letters. 8 (3): 121–123. doi:10.1016/0020-0190(79)90002-4.
  2. Paul Beame; Henry Kautz; Ashish Sabharwal (2003). Understanding the Power of Clause Learning (PDF). IJCAI. pp. 1194–1201.