Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jun 2, 2026

Great Unity

The Great Unity is a Chinese vision of the world explicitly based on the past period of "three dynasties" as understood by the Confucian tradition. In this ideal historical model, everyone and everything was at peace and this model must be restored. It is found in classical Chinese philosophy as a model based on the past but beginning with Kang Youwei it was often combined with utopian ideas.

Last revised
Jun 2, 2026
Read time
≈ 5 min
Length
1,228 w
Citations
13
Source
Great Unity
Chinese name
Chinese大同
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu Pinyindàtóng
Bopomofoㄉㄚˋㄊㄨㄥˊ
Wade–Gilesta4t'ung2
Tongyong Pinyindàtóng
Wu
Romanizationda don
Hakka
Romanizationtai55 tung11
Yue: Cantonese
Jyutpingdaai6 tung4
Southern Min
Hokkien POJtāi-tông
Vietnamese name
Vietnamese alphabetĐại đồng
Hán-Nôm大同
Korean name
Hangul대동
Hanja大同
Transcriptions
Revised Romanizationdaedong
McCune–Reischauertaedong
Japanese name
Kanji大同
Kanaだいどう
Transcriptions
Revised Hepburndaidō

The Great Unity (Chinese: 大同; pinyin: dàtóng) is a Chinese vision of the world explicitly based on the past period of "three dynasties"1 as understood by the Confucian tradition. In this ideal historical model, everyone and everything was at peace and this model must be restored. It is found in classical Chinese philosophy as a model based on the past but beginning with Kang Youwei (1858 – 1927) it was often combined with utopian ideas.2

History

Confucius said: “When the Great Way prevailed, it was shared by the whole world. (天下為公) The men of worth and ability were chosen; trust was spoken and harmony cultivated. Therefore people did not cherish only their own parents, nor nurture only their own children. The aged were able to complete their years, the strong had employment, the young were able to grow, and the widowed, the orphaned, the solitary, the childless, the disabled, and the sick were all provided for. Men had their proper roles, women their proper homes. Goods were disliked if they lay wasted upon the ground, yet it was not necessary that they be stored for one’s own use; strength was disliked if it were not exerted, yet it was not necessary that it be exerted for oneself alone. Hence schemes were shut away and did not arise; theft, robbery, and disorder did not occur. Therefore outer doors were left open and not closed. This was called the ‘Great Unity’ (Datong).” — Confucius, Book of Rites (Liji), “Liyun”3

The notion of the "Great Unity" appeared in the "Lǐyùn" (禮運) chapter of the Book of Rites, one of the Confucian Chinese classics.45 According to it, the society in Great Unity was ruled by the public, where the people elected men of virtue and ability to administer, and valued trust and amity. People did not only love their own parents and children, but others as well. People also secured the living of the elderly until their ends, let the adults be of use to the society, and helped the young grow. Those who were widowed, orphaned, childless, handicapped and diseased were all taken care of. Men took their responsibilities and women had their homes. People disliked seeing resources being wasted but did not seek to possess them; they wanted to exert their strength but did not do it for their own benefit. Therefore, selfish thoughts were dismissed, people refrained from stealing and robbery, and the outer doors remained open.6

The first true "Great Unity" state in Chinese History begins with the Qin dynasty. 7 Qin Shi Huang implemented a series of standardisation measures to unify the country's transportation, language, currency, weights, and measures. Subsequent dynasties adopted this institutional framework with their own changes. With the "Great Unity" ideology aligned with the centralised system implemented by dynasties, it is said that the ideology was built after this "Great Unity" state structure. 8

The concept was used by Kang Youwei in his visionary utopian treatise, The Book of Great Unity (Chinese: 大同書).9

The Great Unity is also often mentioned in the writings of Sun Yat-sen and is included in his lyrics of the National Anthem of the Republic of China, currently in official use in Taiwan.

This ideology can be reflected in the following examples, each from a national anthem of the Republic of China:

The concept was invoked in prominent occasions several times by Mao Zedong, including in his address On the People's Democratic Dictatorship in 1949, as the Communist Party prepared to assume control throughout mainland China.10

Religion And Great Unity

The "World Harmony Launch Ceremony," themed "Religious Harmony and World Peace," was solemnly held at the Guanyin Temple in Pingzhen District, Taoyuan City.11

Philosophical context

The concept of "Great Unity" originates from early Chinese philosophical debates on how to unify a society marked by division and conflict, particularly during the Warring States period. In the Book of Rites, the "Lǐyùn" (禮運) chapter presents datong as an ideal social and political order in which "the world is shared by all" (天下为公).

Scholars have noted that the idea of datong is closely related to the broader concept of tong (同), often translated as "unity" or "togetherness." However, recent interpretations suggest that tong more precisely refers to the process by which differences are brought into alignment or coordination, rather than eliminated entirely.12

In this context, datong represents not mere uniformity, but a state in which social, moral, and political differences are harmonized into a coherent whole.

Competing visions of unity

Apart from the Great Unity, classical Chinese philosophy offered differing interpretations of how social unity (tong) could be achieved. Scholars have identified at least two contrasting models.

The other model is associated with the Mozi and its "Shangtong" (尚同) chapter,and argues for a top-down approach in which unity is achieved by conforming to authority. In this view, social disorder arises from divergent opinions and can only be resolved by aligning all individuals under the direction of a ruler through laws, rewards, and punishments.13 In the Mozi's version of Unity, a strong ruler is needed to allow social stability through the enforcement of law and order

These competing visions between the Confucian version and the Mozi version of Tong reflect broader philosophical differences regarding governance, authority, and the role of individual moral development in achieving social order.

See also

See also

References

References

  1. The Book of Rites: Li Yun (Chinese and English, James Legge's 1885 translation) - Chinese Text Project
  2. Wang, Ralph (September 12, 2017). "Great Unity". Kid Spirit. Vol. 10, no. 1. Archived from the original on March 12, 2021.
  3. 孔子. "禮運". 禮記 (in Chinese).
  4. Pearce 2001, 169.
  5. Cheng 2009, 19.
  6. Book of Rites, Li Yun chapter, paragraph 1.
  7. Wang Zhenzhong, "The genesis and evolution of the Chinese "Great Unity"," International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology 9, no. 24 (2025): 3.
  8. Wang 2025, 4.
  9. Chen, Albert H. Y., The Concept of 'Datong' in Chinese Philosophy as an Expression of the Idea of the Common Good (November 11, 2011). University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2011/020. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1957955 "In the early twentieth century, the great Chinese thinker and reformer Kang Youwei wrote a book entitled Datong shu (Book on the Great Community) in which he put forward an original and radical interpretation of 'datong'."
  10. Dessein, Bart (January 30, 2017). "Yearning for the Lost Paradise: The "Great Unity" (datong) and Its Philosophical Interpretations". Asian Studies. 5 (1). doi:10.4312/as.2017.5.1.83-102. hdl:1854/LU-8507559.
  11. 世界大同啟動典禮 妙元二公主木桂梅宣告「世界大同紫薇聖人基金會」正式啟動
  12. He Fan, "How to Unite a Society with Divisions and Differences," Monumenta Serica 68, no. 2 (2020): 323.
  13. Fan 2020, 325.
Bibliography

Bibliography

  • Cheng, Chung-ying (2009). "On harmony as transformation: Paradigms from the Yijing". Philosophy of the Yi: Unity and dialectics. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 9781444334111.
  • Pearce, Scott (2001). "Form and matter: Archaizing reform in sixth-century China". Culture and power in the reconstitution of the Chinese realm, 200-600. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674005235.