In mathematics, the classical groups are the matrix groups arising from finite-dimensional vector spaces and from nondegenerate bilinear, sesquilinear, quadratic, and Hermitian forms. In the traditional setting of Lie groups, this includes the real, complex, and quaternionic general linear, special linear, orthogonal, unitary, and symplectic groups, together with their indefinite analogues.12
In the language of linear algebraic groups, the connected classical groups are the connected reductive groups of Dynkin types
,
,
, and
, together with their forms over arbitrary fields.34 Over
and
this recovers the familiar classical Lie groups, while over finite fields one obtains the finite classical groups.56
The term goes back to Hermann Weyl's book The Classical Groups.7 Among the simple Lie groups, the classical groups are in contrast to the exceptional Lie groups, G2, F4, E6, E7, E8, which share their abstract properties, but not their familiarity.8
This article begins with the classical Lie groups over
,
, and
, and later discusses the more general formulation over arbitrary fields.
Overview
Two closely related usages of the term classical group occur in the literature. In the older matrix-group literature, classical groups are the linear groups over
,
, and
together with the groups preserving nondegenerate forms on those spaces. In the modern theory of algebraic groups, the phrase usually refers to the groups of types
,
,
, and
and their forms over general fields.910
For the purposes of this article, the main families are:
- the linear groups
and
;
- the orthogonal groups attached to nondegenerate quadratic or symmetric bilinear forms;
- the symplectic groups attached to nondegenerate alternating forms;
- the unitary groups attached to nondegenerate Hermitian forms relative to an involution.1112
Over
, the connected simple classical Lie groups are the families of types
,
,
, and
. Their compact real forms are
,
, and
.13
The standard real, complex, and quaternionic classical groups are given in the following table:
| Name
|
Group
|
Field
|
Form preserved
|
Maximal compact subgroup
|
Lie algebra
|
Root system
|
| Special linear
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
| Complex special linear
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
| Quaternionic special linear
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
| (Indefinite) special orthogonal
|
|
|
Symmetric bilinear
|
|
|
if ;
if
|
| Complex special orthogonal
|
|
|
Symmetric bilinear
|
|
|
if ;
if
|
| Real symplectic
|
|
|
Alternating bilinear
|
|
|
|
| Complex symplectic
|
|
|
Alternating bilinear
|
|
|
|
| (Indefinite) special unitary
|
|
|
Hermitian
|
|
|
|
| (Indefinite) quaternionic unitary
|
|
|
Hermitian
|
|
|
|
| Quaternionic orthogonal
|
|
|
Skew-Hermitian
|
|
|
|
Linear groups
Real and complex special linear groups
For
or
, the special linear group is

Its Lie algebra is

Thus
consists of all real traceless
matrices, and
consists of all complex traceless
matrices.
The classical groups are most naturally described as automorphism groups of nondegenerate forms on finite-dimensional vector spaces.1415
Let
be a finite-dimensional vector space over
or
. A bilinear form on
is a map

that is linear in each variable. A sesquilinear form on a complex vector space is a map

that is conjugate-linear in the first variable and linear in the second.16
For quaternionic vector spaces one usually works with right
-vector spaces. In that setting the relevant forms are quaternionic Hermitian or quaternionic skew-Hermitian forms, which are conjugate-linear in the first variable and linear in the second.17
If
is a nondegenerate form on
, its automorphism group is

After a choice of basis,
is represented by a Gram matrix
, and
becomes a matrix group defined by one of the equations

according to whether
is bilinear or sesquilinear.18
The Lie algebra of
is

or, in matrix form,
19
A bilinear form
is:
- symmetric if
;
- alternating (or skew-symmetric, when
) if
for all
, equivalently
.20
A sesquilinear form
is:
- Hermitian if
;
- skew-Hermitian if
.21
Over
, nondegenerate symmetric bilinear forms are classified by their signature
. Over
, all nondegenerate symmetric bilinear forms of a given dimension are equivalent. Nondegenerate alternating forms exist only in even dimension, and over both
and
all such forms are equivalent.22
On a complex vector space, multiplying a skew-Hermitian form by
yields a Hermitian form, so the two cases lead to the same isometry groups up to a harmless change of convention.23 On a quaternionic vector space, by contrast, there are no nonzero bilinear forms, so only the Hermitian and skew-Hermitian cases occur.24
Orthogonal groups
Let
be a nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form.
Over
, one may choose a basis in which

where
. Its automorphism group is the indefinite orthogonal group

The subgroup of determinant
is the special orthogonal group
25
When
this is the compact orthogonal group
, with determinant-
subgroup
.26
Over
, every nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form is equivalent to the standard form

Its automorphism group is the complex orthogonal group

with determinant-
subgroup
.27
The corresponding Lie algebras are

28
If

with block sizes
,
,
, and
, then the defining relation for
is equivalent to

Writing

one obtains the block form

Thus
is the space of complex skew-symmetric
matrices.
Symplectic groups
Let
be a nondegenerate alternating bilinear form on a vector space of dimension
. Over either
or
, one may choose a basis in which

Its automorphism group is the symplectic group

Many authors write
and
for these groups.29
Its Lie algebra is

Equivalently, every element has block form

with
and
symmetric.30
Unitary groups
Let
be a nondegenerate Hermitian form on a complex vector space
of dimension
. One may choose a basis in which

where
.31
Its automorphism group is the unitary group

The subgroup of determinant
is the special unitary group
32
When
this is the compact unitary group
, with determinant-
subgroup
.33
Its Lie algebra is
34
If

then the defining relation is equivalent to

In block form,

The special unitary Lie algebra is the traceless subalgebra

Quaternionic groups
For the quaternionic classical groups, it is convenient to identify

and to represent a quaternion
by the complex matrix
![{\displaystyle {\begin{pmatrix}\alpha &-{\overline {\beta }}\\[2pt]\beta &{\overline {\alpha }}\end{pmatrix}}.}](/api/ext/img?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwikimedia.org%2Fapi%2Frest_v1%2Fmedia%2Fmath%2Frender%2Fsvg%2F83618b0adfc8aa4bdf47529be667b3c9225a8caa&ttl=86400)
This extends to an embedding
35
GL(n,H) and SL(n,H)
The group
consists of the invertible quaternionic-linear endomorphisms of the right vector space
. Via the complex embedding above it is realized as a real Lie subgroup of
consisting of matrices of the form
36
Its Lie algebra is therefore

The corresponding real form of
is denoted
, and as a Lie group it is isomorphic to the group traditionally written
, and is the subgroup of
of elements of reduced norm 1.37
Its Lie algebra is

Sp(p,q)
Let
and let

be a nondegenerate quaternionic Hermitian form. Its isometry group is the quaternionic unitary group
38
When
this is the compact group usually written
.39
Viewed as a subgroup of
, the group
preserves both a complex Hermitian form of signature
and a nondegenerate complex alternating form.40 Its Lie algebra is
41
If

with quaternionic blocks, then the defining relation is equivalent to

In block form,

SO*(2n)
Let
and consider the quaternionic skew-Hermitian form

Its isometry group is the real Lie group

which is a real form of
.42
Equivalently, if

then
may be realized as the subgroup

where
is the involution defining this real form.43
Its Lie algebra is denoted
.44
A standard complex realization of
is as the subgroup of
preserving both the symmetric bilinear form with Gram matrix

and the Hermitian form with Gram matrix

Equivalently,

Its Lie algebra is

Classical groups over arbitrary fields
Over a field
, the classical groups are the groups of linear automorphisms of a finite-dimensional vector space that preserve either no additional structure, or a nondegenerate alternating, quadratic, or hermitian form.510 Over
and
these recover the familiar classical Lie groups, while over a finite field their groups of rational points give the finite classical groups.6
Linear groups
Let
be an
-dimensional vector space over
. The general linear group of
is

and the special linear group is

After a choice of basis these become the matrix groups
and
. Their projective quotients are the projective general linear group
and the projective special linear group
.3
The other classical groups arise as automorphism groups of nondegenerate forms.512
If
is a nondegenerate alternating bilinear form on
, its isometry group is the symplectic group

For
, this is written
after a choice of basis.
If
is a nondegenerate quadratic form on
, its isometry group is the orthogonal group

When
, this is equivalently the group preserving the associated symmetric bilinear form. In characteristic 2, orthogonal groups are still defined from quadratic forms, but the relation with the associated bilinear form is subtler.12
For orthogonal groups over general fields, one often also considers the subgroup
. In the isotropic case and in characteristic not 2, it may be described as the kernel of the spinor norm, a homomorphism from
(or more generally from the appropriate index-2 subgroup of
) to
. In the theory of finite classical groups, the simple group is often
rather than
.45
If
is a quadratic field extension, or more generally if
is equipped with an involution
, and
is a nondegenerate
-hermitian form on a finite-dimensional
-vector space
, its isometry group is a unitary group

Its derived subgroup is the special unitary group
.12
One also has the corresponding similitude groups
,
, and
, whose elements preserve the relevant form up to multiplication by a scalar. Projective versions are obtained by quotienting by the center.4
Classical groups as algebraic groups
In the language of algebraic geometry, a linear algebraic group over
is a smooth affine
-group scheme, equivalently a smooth closed
-subgroup of some
.43 From this point of view, the connected classical groups are the connected reductive groups of Dynkin types
,
,
, and
, together with their forms over fields that are not algebraically closed.4
The split classical groups are represented by the following standard examples:
- type
:
and
;
- type
:
and its simply connected cover
;
- type
:
and
;
- type
:
and
.43
Over a general field, one obtains additional classical groups as inner or outer forms of these split groups. For example, unitary groups are outer forms of type
, and many orthogonal or symplectic groups are classified by quadratic or hermitian forms.124
When
is a finite field, the groups of
-rational points of these algebraic groups yield the finite groups of Lie type. The classical families include groups such as
,
,
, and the finite orthogonal groups.6
Classical groups from central simple algebras with involution
The previous section described classical groups attached to vector spaces over a field, together with unitary groups attached to quadratic field extensions. That accounts for the split classical groups and the usual unitary groups, but it does not include the quaternionic families over
, since
is not a split simple algebra. To treat the remaining classical groups, one replaces vector spaces over a field by modules over a central simple algebra with involution. The usual constructions of classical groups in the previous section are recovered when the algebra is a matrix algebra over
, or, in the unitary case, over a quadratic field extension of
.4647
Over a finite field, this central simple algebra machinery does not produce additional classical groups beyond the usual matrix groups, because every central simple algebra over a finite field is split. Thus the finite classical groups may be described in the language of algebras with involution, but no genuinely non-split examples arise in that setting.
The complete theory of algebras with involution also uses quadratic pairs in the orthogonal case; that extra formalism is only needed to treat characteristic 2.46 Henceforth,
is a field of characteristic different from two.
Involutions and the three types
Let
be a central simple algebra over
, and let
be an involution. There are two basic cases.48
If
acts trivially on the center of
, then
is said to be of the first kind. In characteristic different from two, involutions of the first kind are divided into two types, depending on whether they become adjoints of symmetric or alternating forms after tensoring
with a separable closure of
, respectively:
- orthogonal involutions;
- symplectic involutions.48
If the center of
is a quadratic étale
-algebra
and
induces the nontrivial
-automorphism of
, then
is said to be unitary or of the second kind.48
This trichotomy corresponds to the three classical families beyond the general linear group:
- orthogonal type for Dynkin types
and
;
- symplectic type for Dynkin type
;
- unitary type for outer forms of Dynkin type
.4849
The groups attached to (A,τ)
For any central simple algebra
, we write

for the group of invertible elements, and

for the kernel of the reduced norm. These give the inner forms of type
.49
If
is of the first kind, then

is the group of isometries, and

is the group of similitudes. The scalar
is called the multiplier of the similitude.48
(More generally, one can first define these by their associated group schemes.48)
According to the type of
, we write:
,
, and
in the orthogonal case;
,
, and
in the symplectic case.48
If
is unitary, with center a quadratic étale algebra
, then
,
,
and

The kernel of the reduced norm on
is denoted

and gives the semisimple simply connected group of unitary type.48
In the symplectic case,
is the simply connected group and
its adjoint quotient; in the unitary case,
is the simply connected form and
the corresponding adjoint form.4849
Recovery of the split constructions
The field-valued groups discussed earlier are recovered when the algebra is split.48
If
and
is the adjoint involution of a nondegenerate alternating bilinear form
on
, then
,
and one recovers the ordinary symplectic group.48
If
and
is the adjoint involution of a nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form, equivalently of a nondegenerate quadratic form
, then
,
and one recovers the ordinary orthogonal group.48
If
is a quadratic field extension,
, and
is adjoint to a nondegenerate Hermitian form on the
-space
, then

and
,
so one recovers the usual unitary and special unitary groups.48
There is also a split description of the inner forms of type
. If the quadratic étale algebra is split,

then
is isomorphic to
with the exchange involution. In that case

Thus the same formalism includes both the inner and outer forms of type
.48
Orthogonal type and Clifford algebras
On the orthogonal side, the structure of the group is governed by the associated Clifford algebra. For an orthogonal involution
, one has a discriminant and a Clifford algebra; in even degree, the center of the even Clifford algebra determines the analogue of the usual
-component, and the corresponding simply connected cover is the spin group. In the split case this recovers the ordinary groups

and
.50
In the classification of real (and local) classical groups, the orthogonal data require knowing both the algebra
and the involution. (And, if one wants the simply connected groups, the corresponding Clifford algebra.) In characteristic different from
, this governs the usual passage from a quadratic form to its even Clifford algebra and spin group.50
Over
, the algebra-with-involution framework recovers all of the classical real Lie groups. In particular, the quaternionic families arise only after allowing the noncommutative central simple algebra
.5149
In the following table, the labels split and quaternionic refer to the underlying central simple algebra, not necessarily to the resulting real algebraic group. Thus split means that the algebra is a full matrix algebra over
, while quaternionic means that the algebra is a matrix algebra over
. The labels inner and outer are used only in type
: inner means an inner form of the split group of type
, arising from a central simple
-algebra with center
, whereas outer means a unitary form arising from the quadratic extension
.
| Dynkin type
|
Data over
|
Resulting real group
|
(inner, split)
|
|
|
(inner, quaternionic)
|
|
|
(outer if )
|
and a Hermitian form of signature
|
(compact case )
|
(split)
|
a symplectic involution on
|
|
(quaternionic)
|
a quaternionic Hermitian form of signature
|
(compact case )
|
, (split)
|
a quadratic form over of signature
|
and its spin double cover
|
(quaternionic)
|
a quaternionic skew-Hermitian form on
|
and the corresponding spin group
|
Combined with the classification of quadratic, Hermitian, and skew-Hermitian forms over
, this gives the standard list of real forms of the classical groups. In The groups
,
, and
are classical groups over the ground field
even though they are not defined on ordinary
-vector spaces alone.5149
Examples over local fields
For the real field, for finite extensions of
, and for several other standard local fields, the only central division algebras admitting involution of the first kind are the field itself and quaternion algebras.52 Thus over a local field the first classical groups not obtained from ordinary field-valued forms already require the central simple algebra viewpoint, but at least broadly the classification is similar to that over the real field.
Typical examples are:
- if
is a finite extension of
and
is the quaternion division algebra over
, then
is the inner form of
, and more generally
is an inner form of
;49
- if
is a nondegenerate Hermitian form on a right
-vector space
, and
is the adjoint involution on
, then
is a classical group of type
; over
with
this construction gives the groups
;4951
- if
is a nondegenerate skew-Hermitian form over
, the adjoint involution on
is of orthogonal type, and the associated orthogonal and spin groups are nonsplit forms of types
or
; over
with
, the even-dimensional case yields
.4951
Notes
Notes
- Rossmann 2002
- Goodman & Wallach 2009
- Humphreys, James E. (1975). Linear Algebraic Groups. Springer-Verlag.
- Springer, Tonny A. (1998). Linear Algebraic Groups (2nd ed.). Birkhäuser.
- Taylor, Donald E. (1992). The Geometry of the Classical Groups. Heldermann Verlag.
- Humphreys, James E. (2006). Modular Representations of Finite Groups of Lie Type. Cambridge University Press.
- Weyl 1939
- Wybourne, B. G. (1974). Classical Groups for Physicists, Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 0471965057.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009
- Dieudonné, Jean (1971). La géométrie des groupes classiques. Springer-Verlag.
- Rossmann 2002
- Knus, Max-Albert (1991). Quadratic and Hermitian Forms over Rings. Springer-Verlag.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 91–107.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009 pp. 1–16.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 91–93.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009 pp. 9–11.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 92–93.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 91–93.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 104–107.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009 pp. 9–11.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 104–107.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009 p. 84.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009 p. 84.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 106–109.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 106–109.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 110–111.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 108–111.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 109–110.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 109–110.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 111–113.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 111–113.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 111–113.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 111–113.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 94–95.
- Rossmann 2002 pp. 94–95.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009 pp. 7–9, 84–86.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009 pp. 9–10.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009 p. 84.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009 pp. 10–11.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009 pp. 15–16.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009 pp. 10–11.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009 pp. 10–11.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009 pp. 16–17.
- "Orthogonal group". Encyclopedia of Mathematics.
- Knus, Max-Albert; Merkurjev, Alexander; Rost, Markus; Tignol, Jean-Pierre (1998). The Book of Involutions. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. Vol. 44. American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-0904-4.
- "Linear classical group". Encyclopedia of Mathematics.
- Knus, Max-Albert; Merkurjev, Alexander; Rost, Markus; Tignol, Jean-Pierre (1998). The Book of Involutions. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. Vol. 44. American Mathematical Society. pp. 346–351, 363–368. ISBN 978-0-8218-0904-4.
- Milne, James S. (2006). "Algebraic Groups and Arithmetic Groups" (PDF). §27, pp. 192–200. Retrieved 2026-03-29.
- Knus, Max-Albert; Merkurjev, Alexander; Rost, Markus; Tignol, Jean-Pierre (1998). The Book of Involutions. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. Vol. 44. American Mathematical Society. pp. 187, 203–204. ISBN 978-0-8218-0904-4.
- Goodman & Wallach 2009
- Milne, James S. (2006). "Algebraic Groups and Arithmetic Groups" (PDF). Proposition 27.14 and Theorem 27.16, pp. 197–199. Retrieved 2026-03-29.
References
References
- E. Artin (1957) Geometric Algebra, chapters III, IV, & V via Internet Archive
- Dieudonné, Jean (1955), La géométrie des groupes classiques, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (N.F.), Heft 5, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-05391-2, MR 0072144
- Goodman, Roe; Wallach, Nolan R. (2009), Symmetry, Representations, and Invariants, Graduate texts in mathematics, vol. 255, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-79851-6
- Knapp, A. W. (2002). Lie groups beyond an introduction. Progress in Mathematics. Vol. 120 (2nd ed.). Boston·Basel·Berlin: Birkhäuser. ISBN 0-8176-4259-5.
- V. L. Popov (2001) [1994], "Classical group", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press
- Rossmann, Wulf (2002), Lie Groups - An Introduction Through Linear Groups, Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Oxford Science Publications, ISBN 0-19-859683-9
- Weyl, Hermann (1939), The Classical Groups. Their Invariants and Representations, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-05756-9, MR 0000255