Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jul 6, 2026

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Software

Last revised
Jul 6, 2026
Read time
≈ 5 min
Length
1,079 w
Citations
Source

Open file format has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.

MP4 file format has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.

ISO base media file format has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.

Request for input: VP-Expert article edits

Disclosed paid edit request pending at Talk:BricsCAD

A sourced, paid-disclosed edit request is pending at Talk:BricsCAD covering the Bricsys/Octave corporate spin-off and the V26 release. Review welcome from editors watching this project. Ahsan Khan Niazi (talk) 23:14, 22 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Request for independent review - Canary Mail article

I am an SEO professional working for Canary Mail (Cartasec Pte. Ltd.) and have a disclosed conflict of interest, so I am not editing the article directly.

I have proposed several neutral, sourced changes on the Talk page, including updates related to product description and verifiable information, following COI and edit request guidelines.

I would appreciate if an independent editor could review the requests and provide feedback or implement them if appropriate.

Talk page: Talk:Canary Mail

-- Ishitasitapara (talk) 11:50, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Custom tech-focused search engine (+ draft reliable sources list)

New technology reliable sources list (draft) and custom search engine. Superb Owl (talk) 23:05, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Is TechRadar reliable? (and should Exact Audio Copy be deleted?)

Hi, I would appreciate a third opinion on this topic, specifically regarding the reliability of TechRadar, and whether it is an appropriate source for the article. Thanks, CommonsKiwi (talk) 10:52, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

source ↗

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Facebook Reels#Requested move 25 May 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. LIrala (talk) 04:19, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
source ↗
June 2026 Backlog Drive:

Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.
  • Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.

Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Request for review: new entry for Draft:Topaz Labs

A draft article on Topaz Labs, an AI image and video software company based in Addison, Texas, has been submitted via Articles for Creation at [1]. The company received a Technology and Engineering Emmy Award in 2026 and has partnerships with Adobe, Nvidia, and AMD. COI disclosed on my user page. Any review or feedback welcome. Thanks in advance! [[2]] (talk) 16:19, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

source ↗

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Trojan horse (computing)#Requested move 30 May 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 🦅White-tailed eagleTalk to the eagleStalking eagle 01:18, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Request for neutral feedback on Draft:Robert Woeger

I have a disclosed conflict of interest regarding Draft:Robert Woeger, because I am Robert Woeger, the subject of the draft. The draft has been submitted through Articles for Creation, and I will not move it directly into article space myself.

I would appreciate neutral feedback from uninvolved editors with experience in software, shareware, DOS utilities, or early internet history. In particular, I would welcome comments on whether the draft’s sourcing and balance are sufficient for an article about a DOS-era shareware author whose work included the MS-DOS utility HotDIR/HDIR, the Bethany Bible CD-ROM, Salvation.com, and related Christian software/internet projects.

I am not requesting approval, expedited review, or support for the draft. I am only seeking constructive feedback on notability, reliable sourcing, neutrality, and whether any content should be trimmed or reorganized before AfC review.

Thank you.

RobertWoeger (talk) 13:17, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

COI request for review of OnPay LLC draft

Hello: I am interested in getting honest feedback on the draft article I have created on Draft:OnPay, LLC. To be completely transparent, I do work for the company and have a conflict of interest (COI) under the Wikipedia guidelines. That is why I’m posting it in the draft space and seeking feedback from this group before going through the AfC page. A Wiki page was submitted on OnPay about 1.5 years ago and it was declined; another reason I’m seeking feedback. My goal is to adhere to all of Wikipedia’s guidelines, especially pertaining to COI editing, and I welcome comments and assistance. I appreciate your time. Best, Hitchnation (talk) 15:36, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

COI edit request on Certinia article

Hello editors! My name's Mike and I'm employed at Certinia. I have a COI edit I'm proposing over on the company article Talk page, and wondered if anyone would be interested in taking a look? Thanks, and see you over there Mikeatcertinia (talk) 22:04, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]