Wikipedia talk:User scripts

To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, Wikipedia talk:User scripts/ListWikipedia talk:User scripts/List and Wikipedia talk:User scripts/RankingWikipedia talk:User scripts/Ranking redirect here.

Wikipedia Help Low‑importance

	This page is within the scope of the Wikipedia Help Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the Help Menu or Help Directory. Or and a volunteer will visit you there.
Low	This page has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

JavaScript

This page is within the scope of WikiProject JavaScript, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to JavaScript, and to the development of user scripts for use on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

CSP restrictions

Hi - anyone else has problems with their scripts that make external requests due to updated CSP policy? Alaexis_¿question? 10:22, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Alaexis: Have you read through Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Today's outage — user scripts are disabled? That's where most discussion is occurring. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:44, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Will follow the discussion there. Alaexis_¿question? 12:07, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page -> GitHub Issue tracker

Hi all, I created a github action to scrape a user script's talk page every day and open issues on Github if feature requests or bug reports have been found. @ClaudineChionh thought that this might be useful for other script-builders, so feel free to re-use it [1] (it uses scrape_and_create.py where you need to specify for which script it should run). The tracker looks like this [2]. It's been running a few days and seems to work well. Alaexis_¿question? 13:38, 10 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Are the titles and descriptions rewritten w/ AI? I'd prefer it included the original issue description (or at least a permalink to the relevant section). — DVRTed (Talk) 13:49, 10 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Links to sections is a great idea, I've added them. For now they are not *permalinks* as that would change the script logic a bit: now the script relies only on the latest talk page contents while providing permalinks would require some work with revisions (is there an easier way?).

The descriptions are written by AI. The main puproses of the tool is to distill and deduplicate feature requests/bug reports from unstructured conversations, I don't think it can be done without AI. Alaexis_¿question? 21:19, 10 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Subsection "Site-wide shortcuts"

In Special:Diff/1351902364, I've created a new subsection Wikipedia:User scripts/List#Site-wide shortcuts for the scripts, which seem to qualify the last sentence of the description of section § Appearance and behavior: Scripts that do nothing other than add a link to a menu, panel, or toolbar are in § Shortcuts.

I'm not sure about some of them, like #User:Sapphaline/skinswitcherportlet.js, which technically creates a whole new panel of portlet links. Or #User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/VisualEditorEverywhere.js, which also adds links to section headers, which some might consider to not fall into the categories of a menu, panel, or toolbar.

Let me know what you think about the new subsection. —⁠andrybak (talk) 21:16, 30 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) § Upcoming migration to Parsoid

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) § Upcoming migration to Parsoid. , with instruction for its migration next week MSantos (WMF) (talk) 09:34, 18 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]