Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jul 31, 2026

User talk:Warriorglance

Last revised
Jul 31, 2026
Read time
≈ 4 min
Length
975 w
Citations
Source

Archives-->

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
source ↗
June 2026 Backlog Drive:

Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.
  • Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.

Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Ignatius Aphrem II has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Ignatius Aphrem II has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:44, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 June 2026

The Signpost: 13 July 2026

  • News and notes: An exclusive club
    Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger gets a community ban for canvassing.
  • In the media: Battle for a soul – who won?
    Commissars, winners and losers, blocks or bans, a Wiki red card, social engineering on wikis, and Swift action!

Removal of your comment at Talk:Mother Goose Club

Hello,

In March 2025, you responded to an edit request on Talk:Mother Goose Club (1). This request was actually an IP refactoring somebody else's comments (2), not allowed per WP:TPO, and also impersonating an administrator. I have reverted this edit, and as a result, your comment as well. As seen in the page history, there is persistent disruptive editing and refactoring of comments. I am letting you know as I believe reverting to the last stable version (and the version where the comments were not altered) is the best decision in this case. Thanks. jolielover♥talk 05:45, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply