User talk:Suinkwon

Hello, Suinkwon, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Mathglot and I've volunteered to be your Wikipedia mentor. I'm here for you whenever you need help with Wikipedia. It's great to have you on board to help create this online encyclopedia.

See your homepage for a brief tutorial. Here are a few links you might find helpful:

Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or the Task Center. Based on your contributions, you might want to consider joining WikiProject Korea.

Help is available: as your Mentor, you can always find me listed in the "Get editing help" module bottom right on your homepage; there are also additional help links there. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or try the Wikipedia:Teahouse to get help designed especially for new users from a team of experienced volunteers. So go ahead and ask questions — we're here to help!

Note: The article you are working on is not ready to be published as an encyclopedic article, so I have moved it to Draft:Sung Hwan Kim where you may continue to develop it without interference. When you think it is ready, please submit it for review. Once again, welcome to Wikipedia! Mathglot (talk) 20:16, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sung Hwan Kim have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sung Hwan Kim was changed by Suinkwon (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921357 on 2026-04-18T19:42:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sung Hwan Kim. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:25, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

To add to the other reviewer comments: This way, way off the standard way of doing articles, so much so that I'm just going to mention a few. Firstly you need to demonstrate notability per WP:NCREATIVE. At the moment we have a shopping list of gallery exhibitions and no insight or analysis of the artist. You can't have direct URLs in the main article text, they have to go via references, see WP:REFB. We are not a directory, see WP:NOTADIRECTORY. Some sources here, such as Vimeo, are unlikely to be acceptable under WP:RSP. But ultimately just have a look at another artist with a long established Wikipedia page to see what the layout looks like.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Sung Hwan Kim to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 07:31, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thank you for your message. I would like to request that Sung Hwan Kim’s Wikipedia page be reverted to its original version, as it was prior to January 19, before I began making revisions.

As Sung Hwan Kim’s archivist, I initially attempted to improve the existing page. I made several requests to update his filmography, as only one film continues to appear in the Google search preview. However, I am no longer willing to continue making edits or submitting draft versions, as the process has become too time-consuming and complex.

I would appreciate it if you could revert the page to its original version as soon as possible.

Thank you for your understanding. Suinkwon (talk) 07:49, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Once again thank you very much. I am requesting that Sung Hwan Kim’s Wikipedia page be reverted immediately to the original version that existed prior to January 19. To clarify, the original version is no longer visible in the page history from my end, which is why I am asking for your assistance in restoring it.

However, I will not be making any further edits or submissions.

Please proceed with reverting the page to the original version at your earliest convenience.

Thank you very much. Suinkwon (talk) 08:00, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Suinkwon You can do that very easily. Click on the History tab at the top, thne click any "time and date" area from before January 19, then you will see the text as it was then. Click edit and you can cut and paste. Under WP:ONUS this is something you need to do. ChrysGalley (talk) 08:22, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but after double-checking, I am unable to locate the original version of the page as it existed prior to my edits. In the page history, I can only see versions starting from January 19, when I began editing.

I am simply requesting that the page be reverted to the original Wikipedia version. Suinkwon (talk) 09:30, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

As previously mentioned, after double-checking, I am unable to locate the original version of the page prior to my edits. In the page history, I can only see versions starting from January 19, when I began editing.

Despite multiple draft submissions, the revisions have been repeatedly declined, and the original version of the page is no longer accessible from my end.

Under these circumstances, I am requesting that the page be restored to the original Wikipedia version immediately. I am not able to continue with this process any further.

I would appreciate your prompt assistance in resolving this matter.

Thank you. Suinkwon (talk) 13:01, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suinkwon! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 07:31, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Suinkwon. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Suinkwon. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Suinkwon|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 08:24, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Suinkwon

Are you connected to Sung Hwan Kim in any way? Professionally or personally. You must disclose this. grapesurgeon (talk) 00:42, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sung Hwan Kim. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:42, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Grapesurgeon, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Please do not resubmit this until the sourcing is improved. You also need to properly disclose if you have a connection to this person

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Sung Hwan Kim to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

grapesurgeon (talk) 00:41, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Sung Hwan Kim 2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. grapesurgeon (talk) 09:37, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Suinkwon You've now tried to circumvent AFC 3 times and have not significantly addressed feedback for this draft. You're clearly just trying to ram the article through without engaging with feedback.

If you attempt to do similar again, it will be a report to admins that can result in you being blocked from Wikipedia. grapesurgeon (talk) 09:40, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Cosmic840, left the following feedback:

This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

• promotional language: see Words to watch;
• personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
• informal language.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Sung Hwan Kim 2 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 19:22, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]