Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jul 29, 2026

User talk:Silencedoc

Last revised
Jul 29, 2026
Read time
≈ 8 min
Length
1,865 w
Citations
Source

Welcome!

Hello, Silencedoc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Glimpse of Us did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  Muhandes (talk) 21:59, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Video thumbnails should not be used as cover artworks

Video thumbnails should not be used as cover artworks per recent consensus at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2024_February_27#File:Poison_Song_Cover_Image.jpeg. Also do not crop rectangular thumbnails into square 300×300 pictures and pretend like it's been marketed as the cover artwork when it's hasn't been. Ss112 07:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Silencedoc. Thank you for your work on List of awards and nominations received by Flo. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

i think you should merge all the awards into one table. Look at other similar award lists

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

"X (social network)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect X (social network) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 19 § X (social network) until a consensus is reached. Web-julio (talk) 17:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

Information icon Hello, I'm Alex 21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Alex_21 TALK 02:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Alex 21, I know you! :) So the reason there are no sources is that it was revealed a few hours ago in the episode of Doctor Who: Unleashed the name of the new companion, tried to be fast enough. ?Silencedoc¿ 02:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Silencedoc There is WP:NORUSH to add content. It's good that it was released in Unleashed, but it's better to wait for a reliable secondary source per Wikipedia sourcing policies. Nothing personal. -- Alex_21 TALK 02:50, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok ?Silencedoc¿ 02:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Access All Areas (Flo album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Flo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Standard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Venus Tour

Information icon Hello, Silencedoc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Venus Tour, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Venus Tour

source ↗

Hello, Silencedoc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Venus Tour".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:19, 16 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Belinda Chandra

Information icon Hello, Silencedoc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Belinda Chandra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:12, 5 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

April 2026

Stop icon You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Maxwell Smart123321 01:27, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Maxwell why? In all this time, you have been the only editor who disagrees with this edit. I didn't start any war. How about you request a third opinion yourself? ?Silencedoc¿ 05:27, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Reverting edits back and forth is a form of edit warring. Also stop being WP:HOSTILE and WP:RUDE and saying things like "How about you request a third opinion yourself" or I'll have to take this to WP:ANI. I have listed reasons for the change on the talk page. Please familiarise yourself with WP:MOSMUSIC. Maxwell Smart123321 06:22, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Maxwell Hostile? Rude? Me? Seriously? Let me repeat: in all these months, you’ve been the only one. You’re the one undoing the edits, not me. So, go to the discussion page. Since you’re so bothered, even though it’s just the two of us, it would be good to hear a third opinion, don’t you think? You're not being civilized. ?Silencedoc¿ 06:52, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
No one is "bothered" this is Wikipedia not stan twitter. And I already have, clearly you haven't cared enough to check or relpy. Maxwell Smart123321 10:03, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Maxwell Clearly, we don’t share the same opinion, and that’s a good thing—no need to change the tone. In fact, I found your discography section quite impartial; by the way, it actually seemed directed at me. It really is beneficial to have a third opinion, but I believe that with just this section, no one will reply to you. ?Silencedoc¿ 13:27, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply