| RfA candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCE89 | 178 | 6 | 3 | 97 | Open | 01:13, 20 July 2026 | 12 hours | no | report |
| Staraction | 163 | 9 | 1 | 95 | Open | 01:13, 20 July 2026 | 12 hours | no | report |
TUSC token b57886a212c826c663608bfecd17b794
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgerbic (talk • contribs) 15:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
deprod notice
Re: "Hey, why is Wikipedia so biased?"
Hi! This is not required, but as a courtesy, could you please give me credit as the creator of WP:YWAB? Right now it kind of looks like you are saying Roxy wrote it.
You also might want to use the current version. See the Recommended usage section for a template you can use.
Thanks! --Guy Macon (talk) 16:52, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
- sure thing Sgerbic (talk) 19:39, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Mind the Science for deletion
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mind the Science until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.LtJohnMaine (talk) 17:07, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Fixing archive and archived-ness of deprod notice
Heya, wondered if you'd want me to fix this page for you so your archive links are accurate for this year, and set that deprod notice section to be archivable (or to just remove it). Jerod Lycett (talk) 16:46, 2 July 2026 (UTC)