User talk:Settignano

Welcome!

Hello, Settignano, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Air Canada, show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...

• ...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
• ...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
• ...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
• ...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
• ...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process – at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Introduction
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:48, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I would very grateful if you will disregard any further mnessage from UTENTE QUALSIASI from Italy....

Thanks! Settignano (talk) 15:21, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

your best bet would be to make any responses on the ANI thread I linked below. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 18:05, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add citations with all-caps titles, like you did at Air Canada - per the Manual of Style, titles should be written in title case, not all uppercase. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 10:58, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alaska Airlines, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Combi was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 00:31, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pan Am, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:48, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

There were 7 editions between 1948 and 1972 (I have them all but 1955).

How to properly list them?

Thanks. Settignano (talk) 13:07, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, why are you adding bibliographies to random articles? The point of a bibliography is it contains works which were used to build the article... if you're just adding random related books to an article, but they're not actually used as sources, then that's Further Reading, not a bibliography.

Also please note that citation templates like {{cite book}} exist to standardise formatting. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 17:36, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

I am reviewing my sources database.

By consequence I add as many books as I have in my personal library (or I know were published) accordingly to already existing "bibliography" or "further reading" chapters.

Am I wrong? Settignano (talk) 17:43, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

There's nothing whatsoever wrong with adding additional reading to articles - but you're not actually using the sources to verify anything in the article, therefore they're not bibliographies - they're simply Further Reading Danners430 _{tweaks made} 17:44, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I will use "further reading" from now on.

What if I get across an already existing "bibliography" and I have that book in my collection? Settignano (talk) 17:48, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Like I said - bibliographies contain sources which are used in the writing of the article... so if there's an existing bibliography, it was most likely used as a source when the article was written or edited.

Also, please take note of the second point about citation templates. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 17:50, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ok, thank you.

Am I doing a good work anyway? Settignano (talk) 17:59, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Aye - adding additional content to Further Reading sections is definitely useful :-) Danners430 _{tweaks made} 18:01, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Are you interested in commercial aviation? Settignano (talk) 18:07, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Settignano, When you add book titles that are not used as sources as a part of further reading, please make sure the section is placed in the relevant part at the bottom of the article after references (see WP:Manual of Style/Layout). Do not insert them into places or into middle of articles. Also, when you specify texts for additional reading, please make sure it is relevant, and has the full information preferably with the title, author, publisher, year, isbn etc. and link to the source material if available online. If the information is not complete, then there is no point in placing it in the first place. Also, please leave an edit summary as to what and why so that others can understand the same. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 10:51, 5 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Viasa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:26, 14 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm VidanaliK. I noticed that you recently removed content from Austrian Airlines without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. VidanaliK (talk to me) (contributions) 18:09, 18 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Settignano, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections before editing further. Thank you. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 17:08, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to hear this.

I do not use other accounts than this one. I am alone and DO NOT COORDINATE with other people.

I would like to know why you make these statements.... Settignano (talk) 17:45, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

hi, please see WP:ANI#Personal attack by User:Settignano. you're supposed to be notified of the ANI thread, but I think the reporting user did not know... and I forgot myself. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 17:51, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Still I do not understand...

What do you mean? > WP:ANI#Personal attack by User:Settignano.

What does it mean? > you're supposed to be notified of the ANI thread

Really foggy > the reporting user did not know Settignano (talk) 17:56, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

When someone reports another user on ANI, they have to let that user know on their talk page so that they can participate in the discussion. The person who reported you forgot to let you know, so Anuva6 let you know. VidanaliK (talk to me) (contributions) 17:58, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Trans European Airways. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 15:50, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

Link to section ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ 14:27, 28 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatia Airlines, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buzin was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 25 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of defunct airlines of France, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aéropostale was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:14, 1 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cimber Sterling, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 13:11, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks but I am still working on this page. I had not yet time to add the proper connections adn sources...

Would you give me a little bit more of time? Settignano (talk) 14:20, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The process should go the other way around: one writes content based on what the sources say, so the sources were always already there. Drmies (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Because Cimber Air has a long and circonvoluted history I will prepare a draft, fill it with all the known and reliable sources and pour it into the WP page.... ok? Settignano (talk) 15:16, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I guess, yes. Drmies (talk) 15:58, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maersk Air Cargo, a link pointing to the disambiguation page UPS was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 8 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Very good, better than before... Settignano (talk) 12:46, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello settgnano, i saw your edit for adjustments infobox image and caption, i suggest you to edit like this example

I hope you understand this, danke. TBB (talk) 21:48, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air Corsica, a link pointing to the disambiguation page F28 was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:11, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I don't understand what you're talking about.

I was implementing the Aigle Azur page in France defunct airlines when I was interrupted.

So all my additions were lost. In fact I asked "do not interfere"....

Do you know much more about pre-WWII Aigle Azur? Settignano (talk) 12:38, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

the problem is not the factual accuracy, it's copyright -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 15:34, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Until I've finished proofreading/implementing the text for the first Aigle Azur, I won't be able to add the sources I used.

"Ask first, shoot later". Settignano (talk) 15:45, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

please see WP:COPYVIO it's not about sourced or unsourced. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 16:02, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

In fact this would be one of the sources: Chillon J.-Dubois J.-P., Wegg J., FRENCH POST-WAR TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT, Air-Britain (Historians) Ltd., 1980.

Check it if you like but I don't think it can be disputed. Settignano (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

unfortunately, I cannot see the diff to verify, but it sounds like it was copied, rather than simply paraphrased or used as a source. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 17:38, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

This is just your opinion. If you'd like to check, I can send you scans of the booklet's pages.

Otherwise, you can consult thr booklet in a well-stocked library. Settignano (talk) 12:02, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aigle Azur, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azul was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:13, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, and thanks for your contributions. However, I don't think the article TEA Italia as it stands now is suitable for mainspace. It currently only consists of an infobox and does not cite any sources. While I do think the subject is likely notable, I would strongly suggest moving it to draftspace or to your sandbox until there's some prose to it. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 15:54, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to TEA Italia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 16:34, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I was still writing....

I will go for the draft tomorrow as I have more infos to add, of course. Settignano (talk) 16:55, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good idea. It's generally best practice to start off doing this sort of thing in draftspace (identifiable by Draft: at the beginning of the title, e.g. Draft:TEA Italia, and then publish it to article space only when you're completely done. Let me know if you need any more help! Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 16:59, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I will follow your suggestion.

Indeed here in WP.en there are afew different rules from WP.it (from which I come).

Anyway I looked at my sandbox and found no trace of my TEA Italia writing...

Where do you think is it? I hope it is not lost as I would like to complete the text with additional informations I was unable to add yesterday. Settignano (talk) 05:27, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I've finished my corrections and additions.

Please take a look at the page and let me know if it's OK now.

If so, you can transfer it directly to the entry. Settignano (talk) 07:10, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'm not really convinced about the first paragraph. The current introduction section reads more like a section on the airline's history, which could be moved into its own section. Instead, MOS:LEAD (the guideline on writing the first paragraph of an article) states that it should introduce the topic of the article to the reader and summarize the rest of the article. For an example of how a lead section for a defunct airline should ideally look, see Pan Am. Overall the rest of the article looks fine by me, but I should preface that by saying I normally don't do aviation or airline articles (my main topic of interest is video games) so there could be something I missed. If you need further help, I would recommend asking the folks at WikiProject Airlines to take a look at it over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 12:06, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again.

Every day I learn something more... As I told you before I come from WP.it where the pages rules and writing were a little bit different.

Now I am working on more drafts.

Stay in touch... Settignano (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

No problem! I have no idea if you've done this already, but if you haven't, another good place to get resources from would be Wikipedia:WikiProject Airlines/page content. While I can't provide much detailed guidance myself, hopefully that page should point you in the right direction as to how to write the article according to the English Wikipedia standards for defunct airlines. Good luck! Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 14:06, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

MyAir

added a link pointing to ENAC

Società Aerea Mediterranea

added a link pointing to LAI

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add Planespotters.net as a source. It’s a fan wiki, the opposite of a reliable source. See WP:PLANESPOTTERS. Also please do not use bare URLs. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 14:54, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I will do this. I also believe Planespotters is not a reliable source. Settignano (talk) 06:44, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why are you still adding this source to articles, such as at Aliblu Airways, and as a bare URL at that too? I’ve removed the section you sourced to Planespotters. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:46, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Rusty Cat, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit User:Settignano/sandbox/Easy Islands - Italian regional airline to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

~ rusty ^meow ~ 15:09, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I know that my writing was weak.

The main reason it that all I wrote came from a personal interview (not written), memories a few press cuttings. So nothing which can be considered a reliable and documented source.

Anyway it was just an attempt to check how a small regional airline would be treated.

I do not mind if the draft will be deleted. Settignano (talk) 06:53, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Settignano! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~ rusty meow ~ 15:09, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Easy Islands (Italian regional airline). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. StartOkayStop (talk) 17:41, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I know that my writing was weak.

The main reason it that all I wrote came from a personal interview (not written), memories a few press cuttings. So nothing which can be considered a reliable and documented source.

Anyway it was just an attempt to check how a small regional airline would be treated.

I do not mind if the draft will be deleted. Settignano (talk) 06:54, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately memory alone can't cut it for verifiability or notability. You might want to consider reading Wikipedia:Writing Wikipedia articles backward, an essay about how to write an article forward vs backward. StartOkayStop (talk) 14:18, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Transavio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 12:54, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Very good, many thanks!

I'm preparing other drafts on Italian airlines that have been overlooked. The real problem are the images, which are almost always missing from Wikimedia...

Follow me... Settignano (talk) 13:48, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Altair (airline) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altair (airline) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Mariamnei (talk) 11:07, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'd be more than happy to understand the problems with the text.

Since I'm quite familiar with the history of civil aviation in Italy, I'm happy to respond to any observations or comments. Settignano (talk) 14:06, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, there is only one airline called EuReCa so why did you create this as EuReCa Italian domestic airline and not just as EuReCa? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:57, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Fatigue has me confused.

Please correct... Settignano (talk) 10:03, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

No worries, I have requested a merge but this will take time. Next time, please just overwrite the redirect. For example, if you want to write about Aeralpi, just overwrite the redirect Aeralpi and please do NOT create Aeralpi - Italian airline or anything like that as it just causes more work for others to undo it. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:09, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

If I have to translate "Spiderone" I would write "big spider"..............

(black) tarantula, very common in the south of Italy...

ah, ah, ah.... Settignano (talk) 10:27, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Alisarda, you may be blocked from editing. Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:35, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I found this new in the morning while browsing an old magazine.

Is it such a serious thing?

If you think so, feel free to delete it. Settignano (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at On Air (airline). Danners430 _{tweaks made} 16:02, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

It seems to me that you're being uncooperative.

Please check the page NOW. Settignano (talk) 16:17, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

You are repeatedly adding content without providing a reliable source. Stop. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 16:33, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

In the next 24 hours I will rewrite the article with appropriate references.... ~2026-28343-68 (talk) 07:13, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

And who are you? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 07:16, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Italian citizen, living in Florence (Italy).

At the age of 16, I began following air transport, particularly airlines around the world.

I edited a monthly aviation magazine for 11 years. I have contributed to numerous publications on transport and tourism. In the early 1990s, I wrote a guide of regional airlines and one of charter airlines. In the mid-1990s, I created the first guide to Italian airports.

I am a member of the Italian Association of Freelance Journalists.

I worked professionally for four years at Rome's Fiumicino Airport and for eight years for the largest aircraft manufacturing company in Italy (Aeritalia, later renamed Alenia). I was part of the team that managed the ATR 42/ATR 72 (regional transport aircraft) program in Toulouse.

I have an archive of thousands of airline images, a huge archive of printed materials and press cuttings, and a library of nearly 100 books on air transport.

Is that enough? Settignano (talk) 14:29, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Right, so you're the same person as the temporary account above. Please make sure you're logged in when you're editing - otherwise we have no idea who we're talking to. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 14:33, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of defunct airlines of Italy. Once again you add a completely unsourced entry - Eagle Airlines - and have repeatedly added unsourced information to this article. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:04, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you look at my most recent contributions you will see that everything is very complete with notes and references. Settignano (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of defunct airlines of Italy. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 16:14, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you look at my most recent contributions you will see that everything is very complete with notes and references.

Please specify what they are.

Then I'd like to understand what poorly sourced means. Settignano (talk) 16:34, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

It’s right there in the note - your recent edit to the list of defunct airlines of Italy. You’ve been told time and time again to stop adding unsourced entries to that list, and here you are again adding unsourced entries. It stops now. As the message says you can consider it your final warning. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 16:36, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but it's hard for me to follow you.

You never precisely list my unsourced or poorly sourced additions/corrections citing their name (i.e. Altair).

If I don't know or understand the errors, I can't fix them.

I noticed you removed the Teseo - Aerea Teseo page written specifically by me to improve the list. Wasn't that interesting enough? Settignano (talk) 06:41, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Here's a handy hint… it's the edits that were reverted on the article linked. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 06:47, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yet if I open the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_defunct_airlines_of_Italy I don't see Theseus anywhere.... Settignano (talk) 08:11, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you go into the edit history you'll see which edits were reverted. It'll also be in your notifications. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 09:04, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of defunct airlines of Italy

added links pointing to Columbia, Volare and Air Italy

Altair (airline)

added a link pointing to Columbia

Fortune Aviation

added a link pointing to Noman

Unifly Express

added a link pointing to Noman

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:24, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why are you adding most of the sources didn't contain URL? just asking. TBB (talk) 01:32, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The article Aliblu Airways has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable airline that operated for just three years. Only reference simply confirms that it exists.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:25, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello!

I hope you've reconsidered your opinion of Aliblu airline. Don't forget that it only used one type of aircraft, and a British-made one at that. Settignano (talk) 09:39, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, as we’ve tried to tell you a few times now, English Wikipedia has a house style for citations - WP:CS1. For a while now the books you’ve been adding have been non-standard - can we please ask that you use the appropriate citation templates where possible, such as Template:Cite book, which render your citation in the CS1 style. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 08:46, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Settignano are you reading your talk page? I noticed you're still making the same edits Danners430 _{tweaks made} 09:25, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Are you following me step by step? Settignano (talk) 09:42, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

No, I just have a large number of pages on my watchlist (approx. 10k+) and I usually stay on there - I'm not specifically following you Danners430 _{tweaks made} 10:29, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

"FOLLOW ME" is a light-up sign on vehicles used to guide airplanes when they are unfamiliar with the airports... Settignano (talk) 10:43, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I've yet to see a picture of one added to your user page, so I can't follow you yet ;-) Danners430 _{tweaks made} 10:46, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Have a look:

Settignano (talk) 11:06, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

MUST... FOLLOW... SETTIGNANO...

If it is't clear, I'm being humerous when I say that by the way :-) Danners430 _{tweaks made} 11:07, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yes I know. I used the other way as it is faster and I could copy the reference from my own bibliography.

But if it is compulsory I will go on as EXAMPLE:

• Bluffield, Robert (2009). Imperial Airways – The Birth of the British Airline Industry 1914-1940. Ian Allan. ISBN 978-1-906537-07-4.

Settignano (talk) 09:42, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

It's not compulsory by any means, and apologies if I implied that - it's preferred. It would be good, purely because it keeps the format standardised, but the policy at WP:CITEVAR is clear that formatting is not compulsory at all.

The only thing I would point out is to be a little more careful with inline cites - there was one earlier where you left in the bullet point at the beginning. They obviously belong in Bibliographies, but in citations you don't need a bullet point :-) Not a complaint at all, just making you aware of the sort of mistake that I make regularly! Danners430 _{tweaks made} 10:32, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ive noticed that some of his edit where he add image do not match with the operator. TBB (talk) 22:19, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Give me an example... Settignano (talk) 07:38, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Eh.. added an aircraft and liveries schemes that does not match with the main airlines.

The caption you put "leased" are probably from user-generated sources. TBB (talk) 08:10, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

A lease is a lease, a rental is a rental... Settignano (talk) 08:23, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Muffin is a muffin, but uranium is a radioactive... TBB (talk) 12:59, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Per favore, ascoltate i vostri ordini, altrimenti il vostro account potrebbe essere bloccato. TBB (talk) 03:40, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I've literally just gone through the BMI article and fixed your references with the correct styling, tagged you in the edit summary, and you've just gone back and added more bare citations. I wouldn't mind so much if you at least used the correct style but manually, but I don't even know what cite style you're using. For example:

You wrote: B. Lewis, "British Midland Airways", Air Pictorial, March 1970, pages 89-91

CS1 styling would render that as: Lewis, B (March 1970). "British Midland Airways". Air Pictorial. pp. 89–91.

The only difference between the two is the use of the {{cite magazine}} template - written as {{cite magazine |first=B |last=Lewis |title=British Midland Airways |magazine=Air Pictorial |date=March 1970 |pp=89-91}}. CS1 styling exists for a reason - that being consistency between articles and within articles. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 10:28, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I know, you told me before.

But if I remeber well you told me that the use of the {{cite magazine}}: Empty citation (help) template was not compulsory.

If it is mandatory (even if it takes more time to be written) I will tune on it. Settignano (talk) 11:05, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Do not put books into the Further reading section if you already use them as a reference, and if you do add a book from further reading as a reference then remove it from that section. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:14, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

UNDER-STOOD

(even if in WP Italy there was a different rule) Settignano (talk) 10:18, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

So maybe the best thing to do is create bibliography section for the books that are cited? See the very good example of History of British Airways with short-form citations for author/page number, plus a bibliography section with the full details for those reference, plus a further reading section for other books not referenced. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:04, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of defunct airlines of Italy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:29, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

It looks like you blocked the page due to a small flaw.

As things stand, the Federico II Airways page is no longer visible...

Why didn't you fix it yourself? Settignano (talk) 10:48, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

That is literally a bot... it hasn't done anything, it only notifies you that there's a CS1 error. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:11, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why do you persist in adding unsourced content to List of defunct airlines of Italy, e.g. Alivicenza, Binair and others? Please stop. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:18, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Now I found the source... Settignano (talk) 09:11, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

It would appear (and I don’t mean this maliciously) that you’re going about this the wrong way - we need to add sources at the same time as we add content… put simply, if you don’t have a source at the time you’re adding stuff then where are you even getting it from? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 09:56, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Related books, literature xerox copies, magazines, personal writings, memory, etc. Settignano (talk) 10:59, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I don't mean to play down your personal knowledge, but we have to bear in mind that we cannot be using our own knowledge as sources on Wikipedia - it's original research. Readers must be able to verify the information presented in articles, and the normal way for this to be achieved is through a citation. If we are unable to provide reliable sources for the content we add, then unfortunately it simply cannot be added to Wikipedia until such time as the source is available to be cited. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 11:16, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I always refer to documented sources. Occasionally, I may add something of my own because I've worked in civil and commercial aviation for many years. Settignano (talk) 13:48, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

And yet there have been many edits where you're adding content without sources - otherwise we wouldn't be leaving notes like this. As for your own work, the requirements of WP:RS still apply - if it's a personal writing, not published by a third party, then it would potentially fall under self-published source. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 13:53, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but it's hard for me to erase the memories of 40 years of civil and commercial aviation.... Settignano (talk) 15:39, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

That's not what I'm saying - but regardless of how experienced you are, sources are still required Danners430 _{tweaks made} 16:09, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good morning.

After editing the (missing) pages for Aeralpi, Aertirrena, and Avioligure, I believe I've completed the revision of all the defunct Italian airlines.

A few are still missing, but they're really small, moreover I've already noticed there are no images of them on Wikimedia.

I propose this working plan. I'll edit the pages for these small airlines, let you know, and leave it up to you to decide whether to keep them or delete them. Settignano (talk) 06:47, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

No, that is not how Wikipedia works at all. Create a draft article for these airlines and submit them via WP:AFC. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 07:01, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I will follow your instruction. Settignano (talk) 07:15, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of defunct airlines of Italy, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aliblu Airways is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be redirected.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aliblu Airways until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Danners430 _{tweaks made} 07:09, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

That article is nowhere near ready for main space so I have moved it trough draft where you can work on it in peace. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:45, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have nothing else to add to the page.

Did I work for nothing? Settignano (talk) 16:33, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I would suggest that you consider drafting articles then submitting them through the AfC process instead of just creating articles from scratch in main space. That article is nowhere near ready. You have three references, two of which are identical, and no page numbers. Something that size should have way more inline citations for the large amounts of text that are unreferenced (with page numbers if you are referencing books). Plus it has an unreferenced fleet table. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:37, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

It's a funny situation. Despite having had professional contacts with Fortune Aviation management (my company's managers occasionally rented their executive jets), I have very little documentation other than the one mentioned.

So what should I do?

Anyway, I don't understand your words "unreferenced fleet table." What else should be referenced? Settignano (talk) 06:35, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you don't have references to prove that the airline is notable, then it should not be an article. A wide range of references support claims of notability. As for the unreferenced fleet table, it means that the fleet table has no references. 10mmsocket (talk) 06:38, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

As for the personal contact, that gives you an interest (although unlikely a conflict of interest WP:COI) but no advantage as an author because personal knowledge would be original research WP:OR. 10mmsocket (talk) 06:39, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

See also Draft:Italair and Draft:Avioligure 10mmsocket (talk) 16:53, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aliblu Airways, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aliblu Airways until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from hijacking pages, as you did with Airone. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Please also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 19:50, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry for causing any harm.

Let me explain about Italian airline Airone.

I started with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:WPAVIATION_creator

When the page opened, there was an infobox and a page dedicated to a tourism and nature magazine (which I know). I deleted all the informations and replaced them with the airline's information.

Now I realize I made a mistake and that I had to create a disambiguated page. Settignano (talk) 07:23, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you do create a new page, please start it as a draft article 10mmsocket (talk) 07:40, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ok.

Where is the draft of the draft page (active I mean)? Settignano (talk) 07:45, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

You create it yourself, e.g. Draft:Airone (airline) 10mmsocket (talk) 07:51, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

or use this link. TBB (talk) 08:12, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why do you persist in messing up tables by randomly changing some image sizes? Things are consistent for a reason. If you think they should be larger, then fine, but change all the images not just a small number. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:06, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Spiderone, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

This is far from acceptable per comments raised at User_talk:Settignano#Draft:Fortune_Aviation, which were made prior to this draft being submitted for review. Again, no pages provided for the 2 book references and the 'fleet' section has no references.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Fortune Aviation to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:32, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Connectair (U.K.) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connectair (U.K.) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:46, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'm surprised by this decision.

I cited at least two authoritative sources: G. Endres (works of a well-known aviation writer) and M. Wickstead (from the respected Air-Britain group).

Aren't they sufficient? Settignano (talk) 14:07, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

No decision has been made - @Mariamnei is notifying you that a discussion has been opened, not that a decision has been made. You're more than welcome, indeed encouraged, to participate in the discussion. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 14:09, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

As @Danners430 says, no decision has been made and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion. I just want to explain that in my opinion, the sources currently in the article do not establish notability. The sources presented appear to be passing mentions of the airline, whereas the requirement for WP:NCORP require significant coverage. As an aside, two sources is rarely enough to establish notability, especially for a company or organisation. I hope this is helpful, and feel free to follow up with any other questions. Have a great day! Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 09:20, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Connectair has been revived via the Air Europe Express page... Settignano (talk) 11:07, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey, if you want to do next defunct airlines, the text should be usually like this example:

"Alitalia was a airline"

Not this

"Alitalia is a defunct airline" TBB (talk) 12:29, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

What about "deceased" airline? Settignano (talk) 16:09, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

"was" is already enough, "deceased" sounds like unliving person. TBB (talk) 18:19, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please add page numbers. If you are reading the books and adding them as references you should know exactly what page the airline is mentioned on. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:20, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Always on my path, huh? Settignano (talk) 16:23, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) If you edit pages that other editors are interested in or have on their watchlists, then you're likely to encounter said editors. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 16:43, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Settignano, please remember, when you translate from the Italian Wikipedia, attribution is required. If you are unsure how to provide attribution, please follow the steps found here. This brings up another larger issue: the way you edit, the way you ignore other editors’ warnings, and the way you conduct yourself are not compatible. You cannot go around adding unsourced content (like on Alisarda), hijacking pages (like on Airone), violating copyright (like on Aigle Azur), and, most importantly, repeatedly ignoring warnings from other editors about these issues. These are the exact issues that led you to being blocked on the Italian Wikipedia, and on Commons. You're obviously editing in good faith, but you cannot continue editing the way you are. Please, slow down and heed the warnings, or you may find yourself blocked here too. Thank you. The4lines |||| (talk) 18:19, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

What happened to me in Italy with WP shouldn't concern WP en.

There's the Channel and a good chunk of continental Europe between the UK and Italy...

Due to Brexit, passports are required on both sides. Settignano (talk) 13:10, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Just remember, some non-english wikipedia article are filled with user generated and blog, so you removed or find a similar one TBB (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Intrusion beyond the border? Settignano (talk) 13:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The article Elipadana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

page created using AI, violation of WP:NEWLLM

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. DraconicDark (talk) 04:01, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I NEVER NEVER used AI, not at all for Elipadana page... Settignano (talk) 11:22, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm DraconicDark. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. DraconicDark (talk) 04:02, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I NEVER NEVER used AI, is this clear enough? Settignano (talk) 11:23, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Caledonian Airways (1988), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 13:22, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

See my previous answer.

Anyway it looks like you do not know a lot about airlines..... Settignano (talk) 13:38, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't matter how much I know or how much you know. Sources are not optional, as you know full well. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 13:49, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to JetXtra.com when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:38, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I know the whole process.

But... can we consider Extra a real airline? Settignano (talk) 16:47, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BA Connect, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flybe was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:01, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genair Ltd. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genair Ltd. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:58, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

For a few years my father worked for General Relays.... roots of the legacy... Settignano (talk) 11:04, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

It seems like you're following my contributions very closely. Don't you trust my commercial aviation knowledge? Settignano (talk) 11:06, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Elipadana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. John B123 (talk) 05:54, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I am very sorry but I have no additional authoritative informations in ENGLISH language.... Settignano (talk) 10:43, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi. As you continue your editing journey, you may wish to review elements of the manual of style, including:

• MOS:BOLD. Bold text is reserved for the titular subject and its redirects. In the Manx2 article, you bolded Citywing Aviation Services Ltd. This is not the titular subject or a redirect. It is a subject covered in its own article/title.
• MOS:SANDWICH. Left-aligned images should not be used in a way that sandwiches text between images and other images or infoboxes.
• MOS:CITEPUNCT. References go after punctuation. Rather than before.

Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 16:05, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks.... but I am still learning day after day... Settignano (talk) 16:12, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skyways Cargo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyways Cargo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:23, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I still do not understanbd why you do not like "my" airline companies.... Settignano (talk) 12:56, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

How do you really know about airlines? Settignano (talk) 12:56, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

See WP:AGF. Frankly another editor's knowledge, experience or qualification is none of your business. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:46, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why not better spend your time following the Argentine team at the 2026 World Cup? Settignano (talk) 16:04, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

haha.... Curacao should win the world cup. TBB (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good day.

Considering that you seem to be very careful about erasing/correcting/amending my texts, why you don't clearly and completely describe my "mistakes." Naturally, your observations should be supported by absolutely referenced sources. I'm ready to read, understand, and adapt... Settignano (talk) 07:26, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for my delayed response. If you ping me, I am more likely to see it sooner. Please see WP:NCORP for the guidelines about notability for companies. Have a great day! Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 07:20, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I still insist that Skyways has to be kept.... it is a glorious name... Settignano (talk) 08:44, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of defunct airlines of the United Kingdom, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Transair and XL Airways were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 23:09, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page LTU International, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A ISBN error. References show this error when the ISBN value or formatting is invalid. Please edit the article to ensure the value is correct, that only one ISBN is used, that the proper optional separators are used, and that no other text is included. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • Avrane, A. (1981). Sud Est Caravelle. London (U.K.): Jane's Publishing Co. Ltd. p. 75. ISBN 0 7106 044 5. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: length (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:12, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

You are right, che correct ISBN is 0 7106 0044 5 !

May fault! Settignano (talk) 13:48, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interregional Fluggesellschaft, a link pointing to the disambiguation page LTU was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:09, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Avioligure, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 19:10, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Very good, thanks!

I love Avioligure as I was in touch with some of the managers and the staff. I flew several times on the Yak 40.... Settignano (talk) 06:41, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Air France. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:42, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but I don't understand.

I just added an introduction to better explain the evolution of the Air France name.

No vandalism at all.... Settignano (talk) 12:52, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

It certainly wasn't a constructive edit and SHOUTING IN CAPITAL LETTERS IN SECTION HEADINGS IS NOT DONE ON WIKIPEDIA. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:16, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Always behind me, right?

Why don't you take a little time and go stroll with your sweetheart along the Rio de la Plata? ~2026-39607-96 (talk) 13:26, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why are you posting logged out? 10mmsocket (talk) 13:28, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

In and out, up and down, left and right... Settignano (talk) 14:28, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Per WP:BRD two editors have revered your addition, so please don't edit war and instead go to the article's talk page to explain why the content should be added. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:17, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Aer Arann Islands when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 14:34, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your kind message. I usually do what you suggest. Anyway, I use this infobox I found on the aviation pages. Is that correct?

{{Infobox airline

| airline =

| logo =

| logo_size =

| image =

| image_size =

| caption =

| IATA =

| ICAO =

| callsign =

| founded =

| type =

| commenced =

| ceased =

| bases =

| hubs =

| secondary_hubs =

| focus_cities =

| frequent_flyer =

| lounge =

| alliance =

| subsidiaries =

| fleet_size =

| destinations =

| parent =

| company_slogan =

| headquarters =

| key people =

| website =

}} Settignano (talk) 15:21, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Settignano - problematic WP:OWN behaviour, not taking on board advice, and WP:CIVIL. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 17:04, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Region Air is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Region Air until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

10mmsocket (talk) 13:01, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry because Region Air was a nice little airline, unfortunately it wasn't very lucky...

I flew with them between Stansted and Paris.

But I won't cry if the page will be deleted... Settignano (talk) 14:14, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article British Westpoint Airlines, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Westpoint Airlines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I love British Westpoint... I saw their DC 3 but was unable to teke a picture.... Settignano (talk) 09:20, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Air Scandic, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Scandic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Air Scandic was a little boring airline.... so I leave up to you and other people to accept it or not... Settignano (talk) 09:21, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Don't add references to section headings as you just did in a couple of articles. It breaks them. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:38, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

A correction is always a correction... Settignano (talk) 09:23, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

You have been warned many, many, times for adding unsourced information to Wikipedia, but you continue to do so.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 15:09, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked from editing the mainspace of Wikipedia due to your many many editing issues.

• You refuse to listen to the community
• You ignore all the warnings on your talk page
• You continue to add unsourced content despite being clearly informed not to
• You refuse to engage with the community on any kind of good faith basis
• You are are either ignoring the issues and pretending they don't apply to you WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT, or you're hoping they just go away and you can continued editing in a disruptive manner

Whatever the reasons for the above (you think the rules don't apply to you, you believe you're right and everyone else is wrong, you think there are no consequences to your actions, you don't want to engage with the community), you will not regain your editing priviledges until you face the criticism and concerns of the Wikipedia community, and pledge to do better. You are currently completely dismissive of any conerns raised to you by a lot of community members, and that's not compatible with Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 16:10, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

This is a very harsh decision...

I formally request that my case be adjudicated by a higher-level committee of administrators. Settignano (talk) 16:27, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

You can manage this in the ANI thread where the community will judge your actions. You need to convince the community, and other administrators, to regain your editing permissions. And I'm not sure how you can possibly be surprised considering the discussions and very clear warnings on your talk page. Canterbury Tail talk 16:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Also indefinite means indefinite, not permanent. The community isn't happy with your editing and your ignoring of everything, so you need to get with the program and you can regain your editing permissions. Canterbury Tail talk 16:36, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The article Noman (airline) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 18 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Guninvalid, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Only 2 sources repeated several times.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Italair to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

guninvalid (talk) 01:54, 18 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Germanair GmbH. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and Just not ready for mainspace - poorly sourced. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:10, 18 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the tip, even though the Germanair page isn't translated, much less AI-generated. I elaborated on the limited previous informations, adding seven references and some nice images.

Anyway, I don't think I can do more, since I've been kicked out of WP. Settignano (talk) 08:24, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

You are still allowed to edit and submit drafts. In fact, that's what you are encouraged to do, to demonstrate that you are able to follow our guidelines and policies. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:28, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'm not very interested in creating new pages as drafts, Spiderone (=big spider?). In my opinion, there's much more to be done by proofreading and correcting existing pages... Settignano (talk) 09:06, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

That's a great way to contribute. As you're currently blocked from editing articles, you can make a really positive contribution by proofreading an article then making suggestions for corrections on the article's talk page. You're not blocked from editing talk pages and doing it is a way to regaining some credibility. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:32, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply