Find my old talk page discussions here ;)
Welcome!
Hi Pizzaonpineapple! I noticed your contributions to Michael Walrath and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 12:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Pizza Poll (for fun)
Lets do a Pizza Poll!
Do you agree with Pineapple as a
topping on a Pizza?
Add votes below the following responses with your signature:
- Yes, I agree Pizza on Pineapple🍕 (talk) 19:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- No, I disagree Pizza on Pineapple🍕 (talk) 19:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC).
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
Hi Pizzaonpineapple, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
- Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
- If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
- If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies
You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:57, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I look forward to helping as much as i can. Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 06:37, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Unblock request
Pizzaonpineapple (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I note that the investigation states that Notorious Digital Media claimed they “helped Lewis Raymond Taylor get on Wikipedia.” It also concludes that the other pages mentioned are sockpuppets of adnanjavidkhan1. Could it not be possible that this information was already added to that website while the sockpuppet account was still active and engaging in undisclosed paid editing on Wikipedia such as Taylor and others?? I created the Lewis Raymond Taylor article through AFC draft over a year ago after i watched his documentary on Netflix and that’s where my contribution journey began. I do not believe this was properly investigated, and I was not given an opportunity to demonstrate that I have no connection to the other articles or any websites in question. I have been contributing to Wikipedia in good faith for over a year and I was blocked before I had a chance to respond to or address these concerns which are not even mine to be concerned with.Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 16:52, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Okay, I've spent quite a lot of time and effort digging into this, and this looks like a good block to me. There are behavioural clues which I'm not going to detail per BEANS, but I'll just say this: the Taylor draft you created (on your first day of editing, which in itself is remarkable) is substantively identical to the previous deleted version, so much so that I don't believe this could be just a coincidence. I was actually hoping to not find this to be the case, but there it is.
As for your appeal, this is a thoroughly unconvincing nothingburger. You say you created the "Taylor article through AFC draft over a year ago"
, and you've been "contributing to Wikipedia in good faith for over a year"
. So? What does either of those have to do with your block, or the sock allegation against you?
You also say you've not been "given an opportunity to demonstrate that I have no connection to the other articles or any websites in question"
... and yet you still don't even attempt to do that, I note.
The closest you get to making an actual defensive argument is where you try to cast doubt on one minor aspect of the case ("Could it not be possible that this information was already added to that website while the sockpuppet account was still active and engaging in undisclosed paid editing"
) which, when dissected, doesn't really say or raise anything of substance.
In short, I'm unpersuaded to lift your block. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 16:52, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Unblock request 2
Pizzaonpineapple (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I understand the concerns raised in this SPI. I do not operate multiple accounts, evade scrutiny, or influence discussions. I understand that bans are imposed to protect the encyclopedia from further disruption. I respectfully request that my behavior and contributions be evaluated as I have always acted in good faith and have not engaged in any intentional or harmful conduct.
Any technical overlap may be explained by shared ISP infrastructure or dynamic IP routing, which I do not control.
Behaviorally, my edits are focused on similar areas due to genuine interest and my participation in AFC/NPP, i spent much and most of my time improving drafts with structures and issues as well as reviewing New Pages which may naturally lead to similar patterns. I did not coordinate accounts or misuse Wikipedia processes.
I accept the community’s decision and request consideration for unblock under appropriate restrictions if deemed necessary. Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 11:07, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I agree with my colleagues. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:07, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 11:07, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
New pages patrol January–February 2026 Backlog drive
| January–February 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol |  |
|
New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points.
| |
| You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself from here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Unblock (final request)
Pizzaonpineapple (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I would like my previous unblock requests be thoroughly reviewed and i request for a chance to prove that i mean no harm to Wikipedia nor any disruption to it, i have never violated any guidelines with my account and only contributed in good faith, please give this a proper review, this will be my final unblock request, Thanks
Decline reason:
That isn't a convincing unblock request. Declined. PhilKnight (talk) 06:05, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 14:11, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Unblock request
Pizzaonpineapple (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I am requesting an unblock as I would like to make a clean start and contribute productively. I understand that my account was blocked following an SPI investigation linking me to the Adnanjavidkhan1 case.
I admit that my past actions regarding account usage and coordination were not in line with Wikipedia’s policies, specifically WP:SOCK. I did not fully respect the community’s standards regarding account integrity and transparency at the time. I apologize for the disruption this caused.
If unblocked, I commit to the following:
1. I will use only this account and no other.
2. I will avoid the specific articles and topic areas involved in the SPI permanently to prove my good intentions.
3. I will focus entirely on constructive edits that follow WP:NPOV and WP:RS.
I am willing to accept any editing restrictions or a probationary period the administrators see fit. I've spent my time away from the site reading policy and I'm ready to follow the rules strictly.
Decline reason:
Declining per CoffeeCrumbs below. And since you've admitted you've evaded a global lock I'm duty-bound to request the Stewards globally lock your account as well so you won't even log in. I might be willing to consider an unblock request submitted on WP:UTRS in late June (6 months after the initial block). * Pppery * it has begun... 02:39, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 17:44, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
- Pizzaonpineapple, this appears to have been written by an LLM/chatbot. More often than not, unblocks written by LLM/chatbot are declined without consideration, as admins don't care whether a chatbot can generate text that looks like someone understanding the site's rules and how conduct themselves better in the future. What admins do care about is what the editor themself has to say. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 21:04, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- Do follow CoffeeCrumbs' advice above. In addition, please list all the accounts that you've created here. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:18, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @CoffeeCrumbs and @MPGuy2824
- To be completely honest, I was involved with the Adnanjavidkhan1 sockpuppet network. I have created multiple accounts to handle promotional editing and get around the community rules! I know it was wrong and I apologize for wasting the community's time trying to disrupt Wikipedia guidelines.
- Here are all the accounts I have created and used including this one:
- While I completely accept that i have broken the rules with those other accounts, I do want to mention that I have genuinely tried to contribute honestly and in good faith with this specific account, i haven't used this account for any disruptive edits and that i contributed honest constructive work and that is exactly what I want to continue doing if I am unblocked, If you give me another chance, I will stick strictly to this single account. I will stay completely away from creating any new biographies, doing PR or UPE related edits, or touching any topic areas related to the SPI so I don't cause any more disruption, To prove my intentions are good I am happy to accept a topic ban or limit myself strictly to basic maintenance tasks like fixing drafts, small errors, reviewing new pages to ensure proper structure and format, I just want a chance to start over and edit with complete honesty. Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 13:01, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Pizza on Pineapple, I greatly appreciate you attempting to turn over a new leaf. Without going into detail in the edits on this account, it certainly doesn't appear you've gotten into hot water directly for edits with this account.
- The sockpuppetry and UPE does make things difficult. One of my areas of interest on Wikipedia is assisting blocked editors in the hopes of getting them back in good standing with the community. This is a really messy situation, however, and I think an administrator who actually has the responsibility to come to a conclusion on these issues has to weigh in on the best way for you to proceed from here.
- What makes this especially difficult is that you didn't just sock and UPE, but in the past, you've also told us a lot of lies during the investigations of this account. It certainly doesn't help that when this account was initially blocked, your immediate reaction was to have a chatbot write an unblock request for you that was a blatant lie. It's also likely that if an unblock request was at the point where an admin was seriously considering an unblock, they'd have to reckon with WP:3X, which may apply to you given how many sockpuppets you've created. That would mean that only the community can unblock you.
- It would have been far better if you had at least waited six months after your 12/25 block to post, without sockpuppeting, so that you would have basically followed the WP:OFFER, which is usually the only plausible path to returning to edit for editors in your situation.
- Notwithstanding anything an admin might say on this issue, I think your best approach would be to remove your unblock request, and stay off English Wikipedia until the end of the year, so that you can follow the WP:OFFER. And definitely no block evasion over that time period! Then, only in your own words, write a new unblock request that directly confronts your past editing history, so no minimizing the situation as your last LLM unblock did. With a year of no sockpuppeting, a full six months of following the WP:OFFER, the admin or the community may be receptive to giving you another chance, and your edit history on this account will hold some weight.
- Please let me know if there's anything else I can do to help. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 13:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Now that Pppery has reviewed the unblock request, I urge you to take the advice given. An admin's hands are kind of tied in a situation like this. Make a WP:UTRS request in late June. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 03:08, 1 May 2026 (UTC)