User talk:Monathephantom

Hello Monathephantom, welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

• Creating your first article
• Referencing for beginners
• Simplified Manual of Style

If you have general editing questions, the Teahouse is where you can seek help from experienced editors. Questions about the draft creation and publishing process should be directed to the Articles for creation Help Desk instead, where you can get assistance directly from reviewers. Don't hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome – I hope you enjoy your time here! -Samoht27 (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Undertale: The Determination Symphony, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Samoht27 (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Persona 5 Original Soundtrack. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. StartOkayStop (talk) 04:17, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Monathephantom! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Please keep the following in mind:

• Don't post your personal information, including your real name, email address, phone number, identification number, or home, work, or school address. This includes personal photos. Anything you post here may be retained forever.
• Do not contribute to topics that are closely related to you, including topics about your family, your friends, your teachers, your professors, etc.
• Wikipedia is not social media. You will have a better experience improving the encyclopedia than contributing to pages not directly related to the improvement of articles.
• Be mindful of user messages. Wikipedia has a lot of written and unwritten rules and customs, so if you slip up, you may get a message informing you about your behavior and what you need to do to correct it. They should not be taken personally.

For additional guidance, please read guidance for younger editors.

Happy editing! StartOkayStop (talk) 04:25, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Persona5ost.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Monathephantom, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! PhilKnight (talk) 14:49, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

what why?? Monathephantom (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

You revealed too much personal information. PhilKnight (talk) 15:15, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Monathephantom. I would recommend getting more experience editing Wikipedia before responding to editors at the Teahouse. Also, please don't move drafts created by COI editors to articlespace without going through the AFC process. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 18:50, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

As noted, the lead does not require info to be sourced, so please don't remove that bit again - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 17:46, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Monathephantom! The thread you created at the Teahouse, this guy deleted my wiki, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey Monathephantom, really nice work on List of Undertale and Deltarune concerts! I just wanted to let you know that, in the current revision, references 10 and 11 don't appear to be linking to any full citations. You may want to add those in or fix the {{sfn}} markup if it's broken. I'd recommend that you install the HarvErrors script to catch things like this in the future. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:43, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey friend! Thanks for the kind words, I haven’t been too active on Wikipedia recently but I really do appreciate your words. I plan to fix my soundtrack articles soon since they’re kinda bad Monathephantom (talk) 02:00, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Monathephantom! The thread you created at the Teahouse, how do i make better articles?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Monathephantom! The thread you created at the Teahouse, I may need help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your good article nomination of the article Ever Oasis is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NicheSports -- NicheSports (talk) 03:02, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Monathephantom, welcome to Wikipedia! I did fail your recent GA nomination of Ever Oasis as it was expanded with AI generated text. It is important to avoid adding AI-generated text to articles, as the community has decided this is not permitted. I hope you stick around! Let me know if you have any questions. NicheSports (talk) 03:09, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@NicheSports It’s partially helped with ai. If I clean it up and fix it, would you review it again? Monathephantom (talk) 03:22, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

AI-generated content is prohibited on Wikipedia Noxajatsocad (talk) 18:59, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Noxajatsocad Please do not necropost. I already stopped using AI for assistence. Monathephantom (talk) 19:00, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your good article nomination of the article Ever Oasis has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NicheSports -- NicheSports (talk) 03:22, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Persona5ost.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey, welcome to GAN. On Balatro, which you recently passed, did you perform a source spot-check as required by WP:GANI#R3? ~ A412 ^talk! 15:24, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@A412 Hello friend! Yes, i've investigated every sourrce and performed a spot check. That's why it took me 12 hours to review each and every content. Monathephantom (talk) 15:48, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good to hear! In the future, I would specifically mention that you performed a spot-check for GAN reviews, as that's one of the few hard requirements. Most folks check a random sample and mention which ones they checked, though "I checked every source" obviously also fulfills the requirement. ~ A412 ^talk! 16:07, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Should i include the actual spot check like every source i investigated so its clearer i did the spot check and how i came to the conclusion? Monathephantom (talk) 16:08, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Up to you. Some people use the WP:VERACITY script, you can see an example of the table it generates on its page. Some people just say they did one. Personally, I list off the reference numbers of the sources I checked, with no further elaboration if the source verified the information, and a note if I found an issue. ~ A412 ^talk! 16:15, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Balatro has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Jon698 (talk) 09:19, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Monathephantom! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Need advice (GA, etc...), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I applaud your efforts in helping us manage our backlog for good article nominations. Please follow the advice below to help you in the future.

• 1. Look at how other people review pages to learn for yourself. See some of my reviews like Talk:Niall Garbh O'Donnell/GA1 or for a video game one see Talk:Puppet Motel/GA1
• 2. You should ideally read every single line of the article and propose prose edits to the nomination on the GA nomination page. Although you can do the edits yourself, it is better to provide a visible trail showing your requests.
• 3. When reviewing sources you should include a list of what sources you reviewed. A good rule of thumb is to look into at least 10% of the article's sources or at least 5, whichever is greater.
• 4. If you are concerned that you are unable to properly finish a review, you can request for another person to comment on the nomination. Jon698 (talk) 22:56, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

• Some people use User:Anne drew/Veracity to help automate the source review. If you want I can create User:Monathephantom/common.js and add the script to your page. Jon698 (talk) 22:57, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

  Hey @Jon698, I would greatly appreciate it! And yeah my previous reviews suck, but that’s just me being a inexperienced editor Monathephantom (talk) 23:00, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

  Although it is not required, I would suggest that you perform at least 1,000 edits before doing another GA review. This will give you experience in editing and give you a better understanding of how an article should look. If you are having trouble finding anything you want to edit, you can always click the "Random article" button the sidebar and see if the page it gives you needs any improvements. Jon698 (talk) 23:18, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

  @Jon698, Is it best if i hold off from trying to get articles to GA status until i get 1000 edits? I've been trying to get Ever Oasis to GA status. Monathephantom (talk) 23:25, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

  It is perfectly fine to nominate articles for GA. In fact, it would be good since an experienced GA review should be able to help you get the article to GA status with proper comments. Jon698 (talk) 23:39, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Monathephantom! Your additions to Draft:The Roaring Knight have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 09:11, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Cosmic840 deltarune wiki is in creative comons Monathephantom (talk) 11:58, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I noticed that you added several maintenance tags to Forsaken (Roblox Game). I don't believe several issues identified by the tags currently exist in the article. Could you please explain the specific concern, either in an edit summary or on the article's talk page? This will help other editors understand the reason for the tag and determine whether any changes are needed. Thank you. Noxajatsocad (talk) 19:05, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Monathephantom! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Cleaning up AI articles, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 13 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Just a head's up, but despite what HG101 and a few other sources state, the actual date of the release was November 1, 2008; he was a day late of missing the actual holiday. There's an archive of the thread here, where you can hover over the date. Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:37, 16 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know about this. I'm gonna update the EB hack about it too. Monathephantom (talk) 17:40, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey there and welcome! Just wanted to give you an FYI about your deletion noms for Avesta of black and white (it does look like the article's been deleted now).

You shouldn't request a speedy deletion and put an article up for WP:AFD at the same time - if an article is eligible for speedy deletion, you can just tag it for speedy deletion and wait. Only if it's declined does it need to go to AFD. Same with WP:PROD - a PROD and an AFD shouldn't exist on an article at the same time; AFD is the "next step" if someone opposes a PROD. Happy editing! Netstars22 (talk to me!) 20:49, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey - thanks for lettting me know about this. Going forward, I will only put one deletion template. Monathephantom (talk) 01:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have reverted this close. Please do not close discussions after two days when it isn't WP:SNOW or withdrawn/similar, especially since you are involved in the discussion and you created the article yourself have significantly edited the article. I invite you to read closing procedures before performing closes. Thanks, and please correct me if I have anything wrong. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 03:35, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Organhaver It is very much snow territory. Literally all of the votes is merge and the article clearly fails gng Monathephantom (talk) 11:10, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

"All of the !votes" is a grand total of two !votes excluding yours. And besides, even if there were hundreds of people in support without opposers, you still can't close discussions youre involved in. FaviFake (talk) 15:24, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

It does not meet WP:SNOW, and you would've had to mention that in your closing anyways for it to be relevant. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 18:52, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Monathephantom! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Thinking about taking a break, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:06, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Monathephantom! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Books as an reliable source, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your good article nomination of the article Ever Oasis is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Purplemaker -- Purplemaker (talk) 13:03, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I say it is a good article. (I don't know how to say "yes" to it being a good article on wikipedia!) Purple, the Maker (Your welcome to say something!) 22:08, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Purplemaker follow the instructions at WP:GANI#PASS Monathephantom (talk) 22:09, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I cant edit it. Make a new nomination and let me review it again? Purple, the Maker (Your welcome to say something!) 04:44, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

You don’t edit that page. You just follow the instructions. I’ll just copy paste them .

Step 4: Finishing the review

edit

You are welcome to use the one-click GANReviewTool or continue to follow these instructions; either method is quite easy.^a

Passing

edit

[[1]]

Shortcuts

• WP:GANI#R4
• WP:GANI#PASS

If you determine that the article meets the good article criteria, you may pass it by doing the following:

1. Replace the {{GA nominee}} template on the article talk page with {{GA|~~~~~|topic=|page=|oldid=}}
2. The five tildes supply the date of the review. Fill in the |topic= and |page=number of the review by copying both parameter values from the replaced template. (The topic parameter refers to the GA topic values found here; the template automatically converts GAN subtopics into GA topics. The page parameter should be the number of the review subpage; that is, the n in {{Talk:ArticleName/GAn}} – a number only; no letters.) Fill the |oldid= parameter with the revision number for the current revision at the time of promotion.^b
3. Update the assessment of the article by changing the |class= parameter value to "GA", as in {{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA}}.  (If any {{WikiProject}} templates opt out of WP:PIQA, update them as well – WikiProject Military history is the main example.)
4. Save the page. A bot will add the good article icon to the article, will remove the nomination from the GA nominations page, and will let the nominator know that the article has passed.
5. Be sure the review page justifies how the article meets the good article criteria. Your review may also include a personal note of congratulations for the nominator.
6. List the article at Wikipedia:Good articlesin the appropriate section.

Monathephantom (talk) 09:08, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please do not call my (or anyone else's) edits vandalism when you know it isn't, or calling a user a vandal when it is false. This was inappropriate. WP:VANDALISM says that "vandalism has a very specific meaning: editing (or other behavior) deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose" (emphasis from the original). It also says that "Any good faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism, even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive.".

What's more is that I have interacted with you several times, and you are aware that I am not a vandal. My edits were also supported by policy, so you have even less of a reason. Please do not do this again. Thanks. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 22:16, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Organhaver Hi, and there’s an explanation for this. I didn’t mean to just blantantly call you a vandal. The default edit summary was rv vandal as I was dealing with a vandal removing content related to Jax being transgender on the wiki pages. I would like to apologize for that.

second things is I won’t really bring the jax and pomni articles back until the original authors submits them for review. Again I apologize sincerely for this. Monathephantom (talk) 22:19, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for explaining that. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 00:25, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Template:The Amazing Digital Circus, a dependency of this page, has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ConeKota (talk) 00:52, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I reverted your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spyro: A Realm Beyond. AfD discussions are not a majority vote. And the fact that Doczilla relisted the discussion this morning suggests that there is no consensus yet, and this AfD is not suitable for a non-admin closure. Feel free to come back to closing AfDs once you've gained more experience in participating in such discussions. Thank you. Owen× ☎ 19:01, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your good article nomination of the article Ever Oasis has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Purplemaker -- Purplemaker (talk) 01:23, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Monathephantom,

I think your edit to the redirect page Tadc should have been taken to Redirects for Discussion (RfD) the first time you made this edit, I did not initially revert your edit because I personally think it is a sensible change but there seems to be a pre-existing consensus seeing as the redirect has pointed to a different article for a long time. I will nominate this page at RfD so that we can decide this matter with a consensus-based decision so that the page cannot change between targets so frequently.

Thanks for your understanding. Qwerty123M (talk) 02:25, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Tadc to the article Tadhg has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 26 § Tadc until a consensus is reached. Qwerty123M (talk) 02:40, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Monathephantom! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Looking for people to review my GA, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Umm, you reveted ne without explaination or edit summary. I supplied an edit summary. I will now explain further. Changing "samurai" to "retainer" ignores this note beside that word: "DO NOT alter this statement without discussing it in the talk page". You did not take it to the talk page. Secondly, adding "ancient" at the link Japan creates an Easter egg. Take your changes to the talk page if you disagree with me. Thanks! Masterhatch (talk) 23:54, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I notice you rarely use edit summaries. Please use them more often as it helps your fellow editors. Thanks! Masterhatch (talk) 23:59, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I reverted your last 5 mainspace edits, none of which had an edit summary. Would an edit summary have prevented the reverts? Maybe yes maybe no but it would have given me a clue as to why you made those changes. Masterhatch (talk) 00:19, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).