Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jul 19, 2026

User talk:Masterchief6865

Last revised
Jul 19, 2026
Read time
≈ 10 min
Length
2,401 w
Citations
Source

Welcome Masterchief6865!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 53,723,441 registered editors!
Hello, Masterchief6865. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm FULBERT, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:
The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia
Introduction to Wikipedia (and Editing)
Writing a New Article
Teahouse: Ask a Question
When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly
2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources
3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Always cite Independent and Reliable sources for all claims you make when editing.

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.


Hello Masterchief6865! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:24, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Regarding your addition to South African Defence Force

Please do not create a section for personal stories. Wikipedia is not a blog nor is it for documenting personal stories. Such content is not appropriate for an article. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: SAHV-3 (February 17)

source ↗
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ScalarFactor was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
ScalarFactor (talk) 01:51, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Masterchief6865! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ScalarFactor (talk) 01:51, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: SAHV-3 (February 18)

source ↗
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 12:34, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

March 2026

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not use Wikipedia as a source; see WP:CIRCULAR for why we don't do this. Thank you. Jalen Barks (Woof) 22:23, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to The Loggim program (TTD Program). I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:02, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you For the Information Masterchief6865 (talk) 03:35, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Control copyright icon Hello Masterchief6865! Your additions to Loggim program have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840 21:53, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of SADF Border war mod

source ↗

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SADF Border war mod requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

Boynamedsue (talk) 05:05, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Ongezellig (Animated Series)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ongezellig (Animated Series), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ongezellig (Animated Series)

Notice
source ↗

The article Ongezellig (Animated Series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NTV

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 02:32, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ongezellig (Animated Series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ongezellig (Animated Series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ongezellig (Animated Series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

SnowyRiver28 (talk) 03:04, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply