Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Aug 3, 2026

User talk:Euphomedia

Last revised
Aug 3, 2026
Read time
≈ 4 min
Length
930 w
Citations
Source

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 11)

source ↗
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:28, 11 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Euphomedia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:28, 11 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emmanuel Sithole (April 20)

Draft declined
source ↗
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, CNMall41, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Emmanuel Sithole to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

CNMall41 (talk) 04:32, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of RIGHT BEFORE THE 30 YEARS CURVE

Notice
source ↗

The article RIGHT BEFORE THE 30 YEARS CURVE has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It has no references to reliable sources (refs 1 & 2 fail verification refs 3- 6 are unreliable sources. Fail WP:NBOOK

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

Josey Wales Parley 22:00, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Right Before the 30 Years Curve for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Right Before the 30 Years Curve is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Right Before the 30 Years Curve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Fermiboson (talk) 08:36, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply