User talk:Cdjp1

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Mikewem, and editor behavior, enforcing rules on sources and neutrality. Mevsherd (talk) 22:04, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You've not formatted that correctly. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 22:07, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed according to what Mevsherd intended, I think. Please revert if no. Jtrevor99 (talk) 02:54, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The voting phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until 19 May 2026 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

• May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase (we are here)
• Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chechen genocide, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chechen genocide until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Tanton, a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Bulwark was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Copwatch, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:26, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there is a move review underway relevant to a discussion you were recently involved in. Link above. Thanks. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 20:00, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2026 Islamic Center of San Diego shooting, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:44, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cdjp1. I just wanted to note that this edit that you reverted was a revert of this ARBECR violation. As you are an XC editor, I have no issues with you including it within the article, I just wanted to note this in case you were unaware. Happy editing :) 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 19:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ah my bad then. I'll self-revert. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 21:38, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

hello. you reverted edits on templates related to military ranks of iran and you said it is because the link is inaccessible in many countries. well i checked the link with ipcheck.ing and it was ok in couple of countries that the website could do the test for. with what tool you found out the links are inaccessible in countries you mentioned?

if you want you can check these URLs—that are all Persian—for the same source (check article 64 for related law)

• rc.majlis.ir
• fa.wikisource.org
• hamrahyaar.com

Vastmajority20025 (talk) 04:56, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to and replied to at Talk:Military ranks of Iran#Arteshbod/Daryabod. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 08:06, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Article 9 of the Constitution of Japan, a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Diplomat was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Regarding recent edits, you might want to watch the spelling of "Stationery" in references to HMSO. Hope this helps. Cheers, DBaK (talk) 20:38, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]