User talk:BFDIEditor

Please do not use my user talk page as abuse. Only use it for discussion with me or about me. I know 7 instances where people copied me or abused my user talk page, mostly by consistently editing it for typing "You are a wizard Bozo Ni*******a user" or "You are are a honky bozo user" Someone even vandalized the IMPORTANT! part of the user talk, and wrote "My father's name is P***s. Many admins have semi-protected my talk page because of that. -BFDIEditor

Hi BFDIEditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:15, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Tarlby, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Object show to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

toby ^(t)(c)(rw) 03:40, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Tarlby Are you serious dude. Why are you submitting a draft that's CLEARLY not ready yet. Please read the guidelines next time because this is not acceptable. Wikiman (talk) 01:21, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You pinged the wrong guy. toby ^(t)(c)(rw) 01:44, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Tarlby Oops Wikiman (talk) 01:51, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

BRO IDK IF IT WAS READY :( BFDIEditor (talk) 03:13, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Next time read the guidelines. WP:GNG is one of the most important guidelines, so read that. And stop typing in Caps. Wikiman (talk) 03:34, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BFDIEditor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! toby (t)(c)(rw) 03:40, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This edit of yours [1] is afaict harmless, especially since that editor hasn't edited since 2022. BUT: the general rule is that you don't edit other peoples user pages. If JackSucksAtLifesYEET wants his user page to say AMONG US, that's fine. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:39, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:BiaFraDIeditor, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:40, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Vrxces, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

The Henry Stickmin Collection is subjected to WP:SALT following multiple deletion discussions: [2][3]. Once primary sources are removed, there's little coverage about the games or series: IGN is an empty database entry, PC Gamer and TheGamer are brief trivial mentions; the iTechPost is the only thing close to in-depth coverage. Vast amounts of this article are uncited and the sourcing is not remotely close to substantiating the large amount of content; it is probably best to write from the ground up from available reliable sourcing in future.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Henry Stickmin to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 02:53, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey BFDIEditor! I appreciate your efforts to help with some of the bureaucracy we have at SPI by tagging socks (e.g. here); however, I'd like to ask that you please refrain from doing so. Tagging socks is usually a task for the SPI clerks and checkusers because of the many edge cases involved. Sometimes, for instance, we will opt not to tag a sock, such as for the example linked above; Timelash is a well-known LTA and tagging their page goes against the spirit of WP:DENY. There's also not as much investigative value in doing so either, because the account was effectively vandalism-only and had already been handled by a CU & a steward. Please let me know if you have any questions, and happy editing! Best, Staraction (talk · contribs) 18:29, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

TlMELASH a suspected sockpuppet, not a confirmed CheckUser sockpuppet of Timelash. BFDIEditor (talk) 20:40, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have started tagging again, BFDIEditor. As Staraction says above, please leave tagging to admins, checkusers or clerks. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 03:16, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

its too hard to stop i just..... want to become extended confirmed early... sorry........ BFDIEditor (talk) 03:17, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That would be permission gaming, and contrary to a purpose behind why we have extended confirmed as 500 edits, 30 days. Part of its purpose is to make sure you are capable of editing constructively within contentious topics. Sock tagging doesn't teach you the necessary skills required to edit constructively in a contentious topic. You gain those skills by editing naturally. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 03:21, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Also here, you tagged Timelash and Astrawiki, by the way, I'm Astrawiki3203 as a sock of both Timelash and Astrawiki3203 which would mean the two accounts are the same but they aren't. If you aren't experienced with dealing with LTAs, it's best to leave it to others. --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 23:45, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BFDIEditor. I have removed your sockpuppetry report because it was not formatted correctly and was causing an error in our case table, and because all of the accounts you listed are already blocked. While we appreciate that you want to help, it seems that you don't yet understand what you are doing, and although you mean well, your edits are causing more problems than you are helping to fix. For now, if you want to file a report about sockpuppetry, please use the form on the main sockpuppetry investigations page, and follow the instructions provided.

I see that you have already been asked not to add or change sockpuppetry tags, and not to edit other users' user pages, but you are still doing this today. Please stop now, or you may be blocked from editing those pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 00:56, 29 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I know they have been confirmed to be socks but I am not allowed to add the template {{sock}} because people asked me to stop, so I asked checkusers to add it for me. BFDIEditor (talk) 01:41, 1 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]