Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jul 30, 2026

User talk:AuspolScribe

Last revised
Jul 30, 2026
Read time
≈ 5 min
Length
1,059 w
Citations
Source


Welcome!

source ↗
Hello, AuspolScribe!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPathtalk 01:43, 12 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Use of non-free media in articles

Hi @AuspolScribe

I noticed your edits in List of Australian flags

Just so you know, this

is allowed. Because, the non-free flag was not represented here, but indirectly linked via clicking on this image. Do read WP:NFCC before doing anythung. Besides, the editnotice tells you what to do to link any non-free file. RAPTOR7762Whats up? 15:44, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

June 2026

Information icon Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Animal Justice Party, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 09:14, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at One Nation, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 09:16, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Edit at Anthony Marsh

Hi AuspolScribe. I have reverted your edits at Anthony Marsh which added information about a leaflet being distributed by Mornington Peninsula Shire that did not include the Australian flag. I don't really think this is relevant to a biography about Marsh, given his only involvement was being mayor of the council while it happened (and indeed, per the Sky News source, he claims to have had no knowledge of the production or distribution of the flier), and the two sources mention him only in passing. I would also advise you to look at Wikipedia:Words to watch -- phrasing like the Shire hastily drafted a new flags policy seems a bit loaded to me. LivelyRatification (talk) 00:52, 16 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rugby union, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gridiron was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply