Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jul 21, 2026

User talk:ARTEST4ECHO

Last revised
Jul 21, 2026
Read time
≈ 5 min
Length
1,237 w
Citations
Source


Good article reassessment for Fawn M. Brodie

Fawn M. Brodie has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 05:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mark Gardner (murderer)

Notice
source ↗

The article Mark Gardner (murderer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Poorly sourced/not sourced correctly. Doesn't appear to be anything particularly notable about the crime and execution of this individual.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inexpiable (talk) 06:46, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Alan Willett

Notice
source ↗

The article Alan Willett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Poorly sourced/not sourced correctly. Doesn't appear to be anything particularly notable about the crime and execution of this individual.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inexpiable (talk) 06:46, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Church of Israel.JPG

⚠
source ↗

Thanks for uploading File:Church of Israel.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 15 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of G. William Richards

Notice
source ↗

The article G. William Richards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for notability concerns for 14 years. Effectively has one source, which appears to be a directory. Google searches found only a similarly named attorney, church websites, and lists (for example, he was a member of the enormous Mormon Tabernacle Choir). Every one of thousands of LDS churches has an organist. Fails the relevant notability guidelines.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 11:35, 19 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Arnold Friberg.jpg

source ↗

A tag has been placed on File:Arnold Friberg.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 999 {\displaystyle 999} REAL 💬 01:08, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Arnold Friberg.jpg listed for discussion

source ↗

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arnold Friberg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:34, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply