User talk:Arjayay

Dobrý deň. Veľmi dobre ste spracovali Mórica Csaka. Hľadám informáciu,k tejto osobe. Mám dokument, v ktorom kráľ Karol Róbert z Anjou spomína, že istý Mgr. Maurícius mal práva na vyhľadávanie a ťažbu drahých kovov. /stredoveký prospektor alebo baník/. Mgr. Maurícius ale nie je bližšie špecifikovaný, ja si len domýšľam, že je to Maurícius syn Demetera z rodiny Csak. Chcem sa teda spýtať, či ste sa pri tvorbe tohto článku náhodou nestretli s listinou, v ktorej boli Mgr. Mauríciovi udelené kráľom Karolom Róbertom alebo Ondrejom III práva na vyhľadávanie a ťažbu drahých kovov. Ďakujem Vám veľmi pekne za odpoveď. ~2026-26803-54 (talk) 14:39, 3 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, ~2026-26803-54, we do not have an article on Mórica Csaka or Móric Csak, so I have no idea what you are talking about. - Arjayay (talk) 16:07, 3 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 5 § Bilingual redirects with an Arabic-script language until a consensus is reached. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:24, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

only caste-related articles and edits are restricted. It's a relatively recent clarification from arbcom -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 00:46, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aunva6 thank you for your message, but I am rather confused.

If we expand template {{subst:welcome-ctsa}} we get-

Hi Arjayay! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

If you have questions, ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Happy editing! - Arjayay (talk) 11:51, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is exactly the same notice as it was on 15 January, and is not restricted just to castes, as it includes "social groups"

Furthermore if I look at Wikipedia:Contentious_topics/South_Asia#Subtopic_of_castes I do not see the "relatively recent clarification from arbcom" that you mention.
The last change that I see (which was to remove "broadly construed") was on 27 March and the restriction still includes "history, politics, and social groups"
Could you please point me to a decision to remove "ethnicity, and social groups" (and why hasn't the advice note been changed? - although I don't expect you to answer that!)

Many thanks - Arjayay (talk) 11:51, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

per this ARCA. South Asian social groups are all still contentious topics, but the ECR was narrowed to strictly caste related topics. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 14:31, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ive edited the template to bring it up to date. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 14:37, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aunva6 Thanks for your reply, I had written a long reply, which got caught up in an edit conflict, and has been largely superseded by your template edits. At least we now have a template which is not directly contradictory to the arbcon changes, albeit that it doesn't clarify that ethnicity and social groups are all still contentious topics. Thanks and best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 14:55, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

might just be easier to shove the CT first alert template into it. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 15:08, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Aunva6 - I think that might dilute the impact, and confuse the reader with different parameters, as well as verging on WP:TLDNR - Arjayay (talk) 18:52, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Contentious topics/alert/first isn't that much longer, and you're essentially giving them the first alert for CT anyways. and you would push the parameter anyhow. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 18:59, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Arjayay, as you are well aware we do not add an image of people on the infobox for large ethnic groups articles. Almost all the ones that I have seen such as Danes, Polish people, English people, Japanese people, Sindhis, Italians, Pashtuns, Arabs, Albanians, Punjabis etc. none of them have images of those people, rather their distribution is shown on a map. Why is there an exception being made for the Bengalis article? For a long time it was like that on this article as well where there was no image, but now a user recently added it. I think it is important we maintain consistency, please sort this mess out I'd really appreciate it. Thanks , Jaunpurzada (talk) 18:17, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jaunpurzada the "rule" I assume you are referring to is Image#NOETHNICGALLERIES , which does not apply in this case, as there is only a single image, not a gallery of images. As for the "distribution shown on a map" that can be added as well as the image, it is not an "either-or" situation. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 18:48, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Thanks for the edit on Lustleigh May Day around removing Find My Past.

The policy seems to be disproportionate for the particular type of content, so I have restored the cite for now, and opened a discussion here: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Findmypast_-_Newspaper_archive

Thanks OwainDavies ^(about)_(talk) edited at 10:41, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:18, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This user has been adding sources from Sacnilk. I am telling this to you since you have warned this user in May 2025, here. Rahulrty (talk) 06:44, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]