User talk:Abatsuki

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for contributing edits that were made in good faith, but have been deemed to not contribute positively to the article, and thus been reverted. You are welcome to discuss it in the article talk page. Also, you can experiment with your edits in the sandbox or seek advice (see below).

Some good links for newcomers are:

• Help contents – the main help page.
• Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to create your first article
• Avoid conflicts of interest
• Tutorial
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out the Teahouse, ask the Help Desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Once again, welcome! R Prazeres (talk) 11:13, 22 March 2026 (UTC) R Prazeres (talk) 11:13, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please also make sure you are logged in to your account when making new edits. These edits at Giralda are clearly you but were made under a temporary account. Please avoid logged-out edits so that you avoid violating Wikipedia's sockpuppetry policy. R Prazeres (talk) 11:17, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Abatsuki: please read the message above. You appear to be continuing to make non-consensus edits while logged out ([1]). While you're at it, please also familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Edit warring. Note that continuing to engage in what Wikipedia considers disruptive behaviour can result in restrictions being placed on your editing, so please do not make me repeat this warning. R Prazeres (talk) 17:40, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Alhambra. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 15:32, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

R Prazeres, you may want to avoid pointing out edit wars which you are involved in. (We now know that this person is a sock master, but those edits were good faith. Also, your welcome was kinda biting the newcomer.) Wikipedian12512(alt) (talk) 11:57, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please stop reverting and use the talk page of the respected articles and don't engage in an WP:EW. Thank you. Eastfarthingan (talk) 12:05, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Done! Abatsuki (talk) 12:29, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

WP:3RR . Don't get blocked before you have a chance to State your case. Moxy🍁 23:54, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Abatsuki, please raise any NPOV concerns you have with Battle of Trafalgar on the talk page of the article. Personally, I don't see how the phrase you're removing here violates NPOV (assuming that's why you made this edit, given this edit summary). The magnitude of the British victory is a major, if not the main, reason for the enduring notability of the battle. DiodotusNicator (talk) 22:30, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

fair, I think a distinction can work there. Barjimoa (talk) 21:53, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Please feel free to revert or revise any of my edits that you think could be improved, as this will help me learn. Abatsuki (talk) 21:58, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abatsuki. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} or use the unblock wizard.  PhilKnight (talk) 18:53, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply