Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jul 2, 2026

User talk:AAARC

Last revised
Jul 2, 2026
Read time
≈ 4 min
Length
870 w
Citations
Source

Welcome!

Hello, AAARC, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, which will be reviewed by other editors. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 97104, not 97100! (tcrl) 21:19, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I was meaning, because you disclosed you had a COI, then you maybe shouldn't edit in that area. 97104, not 97100! (tcrl) 21:21, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for recommending different articles, I will go through them, and as you suggested, I will abstain from editing the page any further. I did link it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by occupation/Business and Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by dictionary/Dictionnaire universel des créatrices, I hope that is fine. AAARC (talk) 21:32, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

June 2026

Information icon Hello, I'm Puffin123. I noticed that you recently removed content from Samuel Leeds without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Puffin123 (talk) 23:50, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Puffin123 So basically, rather than looking at my work, and reading the edited summaries that are clearly there. Except for one which was same as the previous ones, you assumed bad about my edits, and reverted them to the "better" version which includes Samuel's official website as a source, Social media links including intagram, X, and linkedIn, etc. along with the unsourced information, and also misleading information. I would recommend, opening a discussion on the talk page and settling our differences. AAARC (talk) 19:39, 28 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 16:17, 30 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]