Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jul 25, 2026

Risk measure

In financial mathematics, a risk measure assigns a numerical value to the risk associated with a financial position or portfolio. In financial management and insurance, risk measures are often used to determine capital reserve requirements to mitigate downside risk to make it acceptable to regulators. In recent years attention has turned to convex and coherent risk measurement.

Last revised
Jul 25, 2026
Read time
≈ 6 min
Length
1,278 w
Citations
6
Source

In financial mathematics, a risk measure assigns a numerical value to the risk associated with a financial position or portfolio. In financial management and insurance, risk measures are often used to determine capital reserve requirements to mitigate downside risk to make it acceptable to regulators. In recent years attention has turned to convex and coherent risk measurement.

Mathematical Description

A risk measure is defined as a mapping from a set of random variables to the real numbers. Depending on context, the random variables may represent portfolio returns or insurance losses. In the former case, risk is associated with the left tail of the distribution, while in the latter it is associated with the right tail.

The common notation for a risk measure associated with a random variable X {\displaystyle X} is ρ ( X ) {\displaystyle \rho (X)} . A risk measure ρ : L R { + } {\displaystyle \rho :{\mathcal {L}}\to \mathbb {R} \cup \{+\infty \}} should have certain properties:1

Normalized
ρ ( 0 ) = 0 {\displaystyle \rho (0)=0}
Translative
I f a R a n d Z L , t h e n ρ ( Z + a ) = ρ ( Z ) a {\displaystyle \mathrm {If} \;a\in \mathbb {R} \;\mathrm {and} \;Z\in {\mathcal {L}},\;\mathrm {then} \;\rho (Z+a)=\rho (Z)-a}
Monotone
I f Z 1 , Z 2 L a n d Z 1 Z 2 , t h e n ρ ( Z 2 ) ρ ( Z 1 ) {\displaystyle \mathrm {If} \;Z_{1},Z_{2}\in {\mathcal {L}}\;\mathrm {and} \;Z_{1}\leq Z_{2},\;\mathrm {then} \;\rho (Z_{2})\leq \rho (Z_{1})}

Set-valued

In a situation with R d {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{d}} -valued portfolios such that risk can be measured in m d {\displaystyle m\leq d} of the assets, then a set of portfolios is the proper way to depict risk. Set-valued risk measures are useful for markets with transaction costs.2

Mathematically

A set-valued risk measure is a function R : L d p F M {\displaystyle R:L_{d}^{p}\rightarrow \mathbb {F} _{M}} , where L d p {\displaystyle L_{d}^{p}} is a d {\displaystyle d} -dimensional Lp space, F M = { D M : D = c l ( D + K M ) } {\displaystyle \mathbb {F} _{M}=\{D\subseteq M:D=cl(D+K_{M})\}} , and K M = K M {\displaystyle K_{M}=K\cap M} where K {\displaystyle K} is a constant solvency cone and M {\displaystyle M} is the set of portfolios of the m {\displaystyle m} reference assets. R {\displaystyle R} must have the following properties:3

Normalized
K M R ( 0 )  and  R ( 0 ) int K M = {\displaystyle K_{M}\subseteq R(0){\text{ and }}R(0)\cap -\operatorname {int} K_{M}=\emptyset }
Translative in M
X L d p , u M : R ( X + u 1 ) = R ( X ) u {\displaystyle \forall X\in L_{d}^{p},\forall u\in M:R(X+u1)=R(X)-u}
Monotone
X 2 X 1 L d p ( K ) R ( X 2 ) R ( X 1 ) {\displaystyle \forall X_{2}-X_{1}\in L_{d}^{p}(K)\Rightarrow R(X_{2})\supseteq R(X_{1})}

Examples

Variance

Variance (or standard deviation) is not a risk measure in the above sense. This can be seen since it has neither the translation property nor monotonicity. That is, V a r ( X + a ) = V a r ( X ) V a r ( X ) a {\displaystyle Var(X+a)=Var(X)\neq Var(X)-a} for all a R {\displaystyle a\in \mathbb {R} } , and a simple counterexample for monotonicity can be found. The standard deviation is a deviation risk measure. To avoid any confusion, note that deviation risk measures, such as variance and standard deviation are sometimes called risk measures in different fields.

Relation to acceptance set

There is a one-to-one correspondence between an acceptance set and a corresponding risk measure. As defined below it can be shown that R A R ( X ) = R ( X ) {\displaystyle R_{A_{R}}(X)=R(X)} and A R A = A {\displaystyle A_{R_{A}}=A} .5

Risk measure to acceptance set

  • If ρ {\displaystyle \rho } is a (scalar) risk measure then A ρ = { X L p : ρ ( X ) 0 } {\displaystyle A_{\rho }=\{X\in L^{p}:\rho (X)\leq 0\}} is an acceptance set.
  • If R {\displaystyle R} is a set-valued risk measure then A R = { X L d p : 0 R ( X ) } {\displaystyle A_{R}=\{X\in L_{d}^{p}:0\in R(X)\}} is an acceptance set.

Acceptance set to risk measure

  • If A {\displaystyle A} is an acceptance set (in 1-d) then ρ A ( X ) = inf { u R : X + u 1 A } {\displaystyle \rho _{A}(X)=\inf\{u\in \mathbb {R} :X+u1\in A\}} defines a (scalar) risk measure.
  • If A {\displaystyle A} is an acceptance set then R A ( X ) = { u M : X + u 1 A } {\displaystyle R_{A}(X)=\{u\in M:X+u1\in A\}} is a set-valued risk measure.

Relation with deviation risk measure

There is a one-to-one relationship between a deviation risk measure D and an expectation-bounded risk measure ρ {\displaystyle \rho } where for any X L 2 {\displaystyle X\in {\mathcal {L}}^{2}}

  • D ( X ) = ρ ( X E [ X ] ) {\displaystyle D(X)=\rho (X-\mathbb {E} [X])}
  • ρ ( X ) = D ( X ) E [ X ] {\displaystyle \rho (X)=D(X)-\mathbb {E} [X]} .

ρ {\displaystyle \rho } is called expectation bounded if it satisfies ρ ( X ) > E [ X ] {\displaystyle \rho (X)>\mathbb {E} [-X]} for any nonconstant X and ρ ( X ) = E [ X ] {\displaystyle \rho (X)=\mathbb {E} [-X]} for any constant X.6

See also

See also

References

References

  1. Artzner, Philippe; Delbaen, Freddy; Eber, Jean-Marc; Heath, David (1999). "Coherent Measures of Risk" (PDF). Mathematical Finance. 9 (3): 203–228. doi:10.1111/1467-9965.00068. S2CID 6770585. Retrieved February 3, 2011.
  2. Jouini, Elyes; Meddeb, Moncef; Touzi, Nizar (2004). "Vector–valued coherent risk measures". Finance and Stochastics. 8 (4): 531–552. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.721.6338. doi:10.1007/s00780-004-0127-6. S2CID 18237100.
  3. Hamel, A. H.; Heyde, F. (2010). "Duality for Set-Valued Measures of Risk". SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics. 1 (1): 66–95. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.514.8477. doi:10.1137/080743494.
  4. Jokhadze, Valeriane; Schmidt, Wolfgang M. (March 2020). "Measuring model risk in financial risk management and pricing". International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance. 23 (2) 2050012. doi:10.1142/s0219024920500120. SSRN 3113139.
  5. Andreas H. Hamel; Frank Heyde; Birgit Rudloff (2011). "Set-valued risk measures for conical market models". Mathematics and Financial Economics. 5 (1): 1–28. arXiv:1011.5986. doi:10.1007/s11579-011-0047-0. S2CID 154784949.
  6. Rockafellar, Tyrrell; Uryasev, Stanislav; Zabarankin, Michael (22 January 2003). "Deviation Measures in Risk Analysis and Optimization". SSRN 365640.
Further reading

Further reading