Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jun 19, 2026

Particle number operator

In quantum mechanics, for systems where the total number of particles may not be preserved, the number operator is the observable that counts the number of particles.

Last revised
Jun 19, 2026
Read time
≈ 3 min
Length
592 w
Citations
Source

In quantum mechanics, for systems where the total number of particles may not be preserved, the number operator is the observable that counts the number of particles.

The following is in bra–ket notation: The number operator acts on Fock space. Let

| Ψ ν = | ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 , , ϕ n ν {\displaystyle |\Psi \rangle _{\nu }=|\phi _{1},\phi _{2},\cdots ,\phi _{n}\rangle _{\nu }}

be a Fock state, composed of single-particle states | ϕ i {\displaystyle |\phi _{i}\rangle } drawn from a basis of the underlying Hilbert space of the Fock space. Given the corresponding creation and annihilation operators a ( ϕ i ) {\displaystyle a^{\dagger }(\phi _{i})} and a ( ϕ i ) {\displaystyle a(\phi _{i})\,} we define the number operator by

N i ^   = d e f   a ( ϕ i ) a ( ϕ i ) {\displaystyle {\hat {N_{i}}}\ {\stackrel {\mathrm {def} }{=}}\ a^{\dagger }(\phi _{i})a(\phi _{i})}

and we have

N i ^ | Ψ ν = N i | Ψ ν {\displaystyle {\hat {N_{i}}}|\Psi \rangle _{\nu }=N_{i}|\Psi \rangle _{\nu }}

where N i {\displaystyle N_{i}} is the number of particles in state | ϕ i {\displaystyle |\phi _{i}\rangle } . The above equality can be proven by noting that a ( ϕ i ) | ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 , , ϕ i 1 , ϕ i , ϕ i + 1 , , ϕ n ν = N i | ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 , , ϕ i 1 , ϕ i + 1 , , ϕ n ν a ( ϕ i ) | ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 , , ϕ i 1 , ϕ i + 1 , , ϕ n ν = N i | ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 , , ϕ i 1 , ϕ i , ϕ i + 1 , , ϕ n ν {\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}a(\phi _{i})|\phi _{1},\phi _{2},\cdots ,\phi _{i-1},\phi _{i},\phi _{i+1},\cdots ,\phi _{n}\rangle _{\nu }&=&{\sqrt {N_{i}}}|\phi _{1},\phi _{2},\cdots ,\phi _{i-1},\phi _{i+1},\cdots ,\phi _{n}\rangle _{\nu }\\a^{\dagger }(\phi _{i})|\phi _{1},\phi _{2},\cdots ,\phi _{i-1},\phi _{i+1},\cdots ,\phi _{n}\rangle _{\nu }&=&{\sqrt {N_{i}}}|\phi _{1},\phi _{2},\cdots ,\phi _{i-1},\phi _{i},\phi _{i+1},\cdots ,\phi _{n}\rangle _{\nu }\end{matrix}}} then N i ^ | Ψ ν = a ( ϕ i ) a ( ϕ i ) | ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 , , ϕ i 1 , ϕ i , ϕ i + 1 , , ϕ n ν = N i a ( ϕ i ) | ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 , , ϕ i 1 , ϕ i + 1 , , ϕ n ν = N i N i | ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 , , ϕ i 1 , ϕ i , ϕ i + 1 , , ϕ n ν = N i | Ψ ν {\displaystyle {\begin{array}{rcl}{\hat {N_{i}}}|\Psi \rangle _{\nu }&=&a^{\dagger }(\phi _{i})a(\phi _{i})\left|\phi _{1},\phi _{2},\cdots ,\phi _{i-1},\phi _{i},\phi _{i+1},\cdots ,\phi _{n}\right\rangle _{\nu }\\[1ex]&=&{\sqrt {N_{i}}}a^{\dagger }(\phi _{i})\left|\phi _{1},\phi _{2},\cdots ,\phi _{i-1},\phi _{i+1},\cdots ,\phi _{n}\right\rangle _{\nu }\\[1ex]&=&{\sqrt {N_{i}}}{\sqrt {N_{i}}}\left|\phi _{1},\phi _{2},\cdots ,\phi _{i-1},\phi _{i},\phi _{i+1},\cdots ,\phi _{n}\right\rangle _{\nu }\\[1ex]&=&N_{i}|\Psi \rangle _{\nu }\\[1ex]\end{array}}}

See also

See also

References

References