Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jul 27, 2026

Fractional dominating set

In graph theory, a fractional dominating set is a generalization of the dominating set concept that allows vertices to be assigned fractional weights between 0 and 1, rather than binary membership. This relaxation transforms the domination problem into a linear programming problem, often yielding more precise bounds and enabling polynomial-time computation.

Last revised
Jul 27, 2026
Read time
≈ 5 min
Length
1,098 w
Citations
22
Source
The sum of the weights of each vertex and its neighbors (its closed neighborhood) is at least 1. The assignment of weights is therefore a fractional dominating set. One may consider the sum of all weights of the graph across all fractional dominating sets; the smallest of these is the graph's fractional domination number. The graph shown has an optimal set shown, with a total sum of 7 / 3 {\displaystyle 7/3} . source ↗

In graph theory, a fractional dominating set is a generalization of the dominating set concept that allows vertices to be assigned fractional weights between 0 and 1, rather than binary membership. This relaxation transforms the domination problem into a linear programming problem, often yielding more precise bounds and enabling polynomial-time computation.

Definition

Let G = ( V , E ) {\displaystyle G=(V,E)} be a graph. A fractional dominating function is a function f : V [ 0 , 1 ] {\displaystyle f:V\to [0,1]} such that for every vertex v V {\displaystyle v\in V} , the sum of f {\displaystyle f} over the closed neighborhood N [ v ] {\displaystyle N[v]} is at least 1:12

u N [ v ] f ( u ) 1 {\displaystyle \sum _{u\in N[v]}f(u)\geq 1}

The fractional domination number γ f ( G ) {\displaystyle \gamma _{f}(G)} is the minimum total weight of a fractional dominating function:

γ f ( G ) = min { v V f ( v ) } {\displaystyle \gamma _{f}(G)=\min \left\{\sum _{v\in V}f(v)\right\}}

Properties

For any graph G {\displaystyle G} , the fractional domination number satisfies:1

γ f ( G ) γ ( G ) Γ ( G ) Γ f ( G ) {\displaystyle \gamma _{f}(G)\leq \gamma (G)\leq \Gamma (G)\leq \Gamma _{f}(G)}

where γ ( G ) {\displaystyle \gamma (G)} is the domination number, Γ ( G ) {\displaystyle \Gamma (G)} is the upper domination number, and Γ f ( G ) {\displaystyle \Gamma _{f}(G)} is the upper fractional domination number.

The fractional domination number can be computed as the solution to a linear program by utilizing strong duality.2

For any graph G {\displaystyle G} with n {\displaystyle n} vertices, minimum degree δ {\displaystyle \delta } , and maximum degree Δ {\displaystyle \Delta } :2

n Δ + 1 γ f ( G ) n δ + 1 {\displaystyle {\frac {n}{\Delta +1}}\leq \gamma _{f}(G)\leq {\frac {n}{\delta +1}}}

For any graph G {\displaystyle G} , the fractional edge domination number equals the domination number of the line graph:3

γ f ( G ) = γ ( L ( G ) ) {\displaystyle \gamma '_{f}(G)=\gamma (L(G))}

Formulas for specific graph families

For a k-regular graph with n {\displaystyle n} vertices and k 1 {\displaystyle k\geq 1} :14

γ f ( G ) = n k + 1 {\displaystyle \gamma _{f}(G)={\frac {n}{k+1}}}

For the complete bipartite graph K r , s {\displaystyle K_{r,s}} :2

γ f ( K r , s ) = r ( s 1 ) + s ( r 1 ) r s 1 {\displaystyle \gamma _{f}(K_{r,s})={\frac {r(s-1)+s(r-1)}{rs-1}}}

For the cycle graph C n {\displaystyle C_{n}} :3

γ f ( C n ) = n 3 {\displaystyle \gamma _{f}(C_{n})={\frac {n}{3}}}

For the path graph P n {\displaystyle P_{n}} :3

γ f ( P n ) = n 3 {\displaystyle \gamma _{f}(P_{n})=\left\lceil {\frac {n}{3}}\right\rceil }

For the crown graph H n , n {\displaystyle H_{n,n}} :3

γ f ( H n , n ) = 2 {\displaystyle \gamma _{f}(H_{n,n})=2}

For the wheel graph W n {\displaystyle W_{n}} with n > 3 {\displaystyle n>3} vertices:3

γ f ( W n ) = 1 {\displaystyle \gamma _{f}(W_{n})=1}

Several graph classes have γ f ( G ) = γ ( G ) {\displaystyle \gamma _{f}(G)=\gamma (G)} :2

For the strong product of graphs G H {\displaystyle G\boxtimes H} :2

γ f ( G H ) = γ f ( G ) γ f ( H ) {\displaystyle \gamma _{f}(G\boxtimes H)=\gamma _{f}(G)\cdot \gamma _{f}(H)}

For the Cartesian product of graphs G H {\displaystyle G\square H} (Vizing's conjecture, fractional version):2

γ f ( G H ) γ f ( G ) γ f ( H ) {\displaystyle \gamma _{f}(G\square H)\geq \gamma _{f}(G)\cdot \gamma _{f}(H)}

Computational complexity

Since the fractional domination number can be formulated as a linear program, it can be computed in polynomial time, unlike the standard domination number which is NP-hard to compute.2

Variants

A fractional distance k-dominating function generalizes the concept by requiring that for every vertex v {\displaystyle v} , the sum over its distance- k {\displaystyle k} neighborhood N k [ v ] {\displaystyle N_{k}[v]} (vertices at distance at most k {\displaystyle k} from v {\displaystyle v} ) is at least one. The corresponding fractional distance k-domination number is denoted γ k f ( G ) {\displaystyle \gamma _{kf}(G)} . 4

For k {\displaystyle k} -regular graphs and specific values of k {\displaystyle k} , exact formulas exist. For instance, for cycles C n {\displaystyle C_{n}} :4

γ k f ( C n ) = n 2 k + 1 {\displaystyle \gamma _{kf}(C_{n})={\frac {n}{2k+1}}}

An efficient fractional dominating function satisfies

u N [ v ] f ( u ) = 1 {\displaystyle \sum _{u\in N[v]}f(u)=1}

for all vertices v {\displaystyle v} . Not all graphs admit efficient fractional dominating functions.2

A fractional total dominating function requires that for every vertex v {\displaystyle v} , the sum over its open neighborhood N ( v ) {\displaystyle N(v)} (excluding v {\displaystyle v} itself) is at least one. The fractional total domination number is denoted γ f t ( G ) {\displaystyle \gamma _{ft}(G)} .2

The upper fractional domination number Γ f ( G ) {\displaystyle \Gamma _{f}(G)} is the maximum weight among all minimal fractional dominating functions.2

See also

See also

References

References

  1. Haynes, Teresa W.; Hedetniemi, Stephen T.; Slater, Peter J. (1998). Fundamentals of Domination in Graphs. Marcel Dekker. pp. 261–262. ISBN 9780429157769.
  2. Goddard, Wayne; Henning, Michael A. (2020). "Fractional Dominating Parameters". In Haynes, Teresa W.; Hedetniemi, Stephen T.; Henning, Michael A. (eds.). Topics in Domination in Graphs. Springer. pp. 349–363. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51117-3_10. ISBN 978-3-030-51117-3.
  3. Shanthi, P.; Amutha, S.; Anbazhagan, N.; Bragatheeswara Prabu, S. (2023). "Effects on fractional domination in graphs". Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 44 (5): 7855–7864. doi:10.3233/JIFS-222999.
  4. Arumugam, S.; Mathew, Varughese; Karuppasamy, K. (2012). "Fractional distance domination in graphs". Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory. 32 (3): 449–459. doi:10.7151/dmgt.1609.