Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jun 9, 2026

Fibration of simplicial sets

In mathematics, especially in homotopy theory, a left fibration of simplicial sets is a map that has the right lifting property with respect to the horn inclusions . A right fibration is defined similarly with the condition . A Kan fibration is one with the right lifting property with respect to every horn inclusion; hence, a Kan fibration is exactly a map that is both a left and right fibration.

Last revised
Jun 9, 2026
Read time
≈ 8 min
Length
1,841 w
Citations
28
Source

In mathematics, especially in homotopy theory, a left fibration of simplicial sets is a map that has the right lifting property with respect to the horn inclusions Λ i n Δ n , 0 i < n {\displaystyle \Lambda _{i}^{n}\subset \Delta ^{n},0\leq i<n} .1 A right fibration is defined similarly with the condition 0 < i n {\displaystyle 0<i\leq n} .1 A Kan fibration is one with the right lifting property with respect to every horn inclusion; hence, a Kan fibration is exactly a map that is both a left and right fibration.2

Examples

A right fibration is a cartesian fibration such that each fiber is a Kan complex.

In particular, a category fibered in groupoids over another category is a special case of a right fibration of simplicial sets in the ∞-category setup.

Anodyne extensions

A left anodyne extension is a map in the saturation of the set of the horn inclusions Λ k n Δ n {\displaystyle \Lambda _{k}^{n}\to \Delta ^{n}} for n 1 , 0 k < n {\displaystyle n\geq 1,0\leq k<n} in the category of simplicial sets, where the saturation of a class is the smallest class that contains the class and is stable under pushouts, retracts and transfinite compositions (compositions of infinitely many maps).3 A right anodyne extension is defined by replacing the condition 0 k < n {\displaystyle 0\leq k<n} with 0 < k n {\displaystyle 0<k\leq n} . The notions are originally due to Gabriel–Zisman and are used to study fibrations for simplicial sets.

A left (or right) anodyne extension is a monomorphism (since the class of monomorphisms is saturated,4 the saturation lies in the class of monomorphisms).

Given a class F {\displaystyle F} of maps, let r ( F ) {\displaystyle r(F)} denote the class of maps satisfying the right lifting property with respect to F {\displaystyle F} . Then r ( F ) = r ( F ¯ ) {\displaystyle r(F)=r({\overline {F}})} for the saturation F ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {F}}} of F {\displaystyle F} .5 Thus, a map is a left (resp. right) fibration if and only if it has the right lifting property with respect to left (resp. right) anodyne extensions.3

An inner anodyne extension is a map in the saturation of the horn inclusions Λ k n Δ n {\displaystyle \Lambda _{k}^{n}\to \Delta ^{n}} for n 1 , 0 < k < n {\displaystyle n\geq 1,0<k<n} .6 The maps having the right lifting property with respect to inner anodyne extensions or equivalently with respect to the horn inclusions Λ k n Δ n , n 1 , 0 < k < n {\displaystyle \Lambda _{k}^{n}\to \Delta ^{n},\,n\geq 1,0<k<n} are called inner fibrations.7 Simplicial sets are then weak Kan complexes (∞-categories) if unique maps to the final object are inner fibrations.

An isofibration p : X Y {\displaystyle p:X\to Y} is an inner fibration such that for each object (0-simplex) x 0 {\displaystyle x_{0}} in X {\displaystyle X} and an invertible map g : y 0 y 1 {\displaystyle g:y_{0}\to y_{1}} with p ( x 0 ) = y 0 {\displaystyle p(x_{0})=y_{0}} in Y {\displaystyle Y} , there exists a map f {\displaystyle f} in X {\displaystyle X} such that p ( f ) = g {\displaystyle p(f)=g} .8 For example, a left (or right) fibration between weak Kan complexes is a conservative isofibration.9

Theorem of Gabriel and Zisman

Given monomorphisms i : A B {\displaystyle i:A\to B} and k : Y Z {\displaystyle k:Y\to Z} , let i A × Y k {\displaystyle i\sqcup _{A\times Y}k} denote the pushout of i × id Y {\displaystyle i\times \operatorname {id} _{Y}} and id A × k {\displaystyle \operatorname {id} _{A}\times k} . Then a theorem of Gabriel and Zisman says:1011 if i {\displaystyle i} is a left (resp. right) anodyne extension, then the induced map

i A × Y k B × Z {\displaystyle i\sqcup _{A\times Y}k\to B\times Z}

is a left (resp. right) anodyne extension. Similarly, if i {\displaystyle i} is an inner anodyne extension, then the above induced map is an inner anodyne extension.12

A special case of the above is the covering homotopy extension property:13 a Kan fibration has the right lifting property with respect to ( Y × I ) ( Z × 0 ) Z × I {\displaystyle (Y\times I)\sqcup (Z\times 0)\to Z\times I} for monomorphisms Y Z {\displaystyle Y\to Z} and 0 I = Δ 1 {\displaystyle 0\to I=\Delta ^{1}} .

As a corollary of the theorem, a map p : X Y {\displaystyle p:X\to Y} is an inner fibration if and only if for each monomorphism i : A B {\displaystyle i:A\to B} , the induced map

( i , p ) : Hom _ ( B , X ) Hom _ ( A , X ) × Hom _ ( A , Y ) Hom _ ( B , Y ) {\displaystyle (i^{*},p_{*}):{\underline {\operatorname {Hom} }}(B,X)\to {\underline {\operatorname {Hom} }}(A,X)\times _{{\underline {\operatorname {Hom} }}(A,Y)}{\underline {\operatorname {Hom} }}(B,Y)}

is an inner fibration.1415 Similarly, if p {\displaystyle p} is a left (resp. right) fibration, then ( i , p ) {\displaystyle (i^{*},p_{*})} is a left (resp. right) fibration.16

Model category structure

The category of simplicial sets sSet has the standard model category structure where 17

  • The cofibrations are the monomorphisms,
  • The fibrations are the Kan fibrations,
  • The weak equivalences are the maps f {\displaystyle f} such that f {\displaystyle f^{*}} is bijective on simplicial homotopy classes for each Kan complex (fibrant object),
  • A fibration is trivial (i.e., has the right lifting property with respect to monomorphisms) if and only if it is a weak equivalence,
  • A cofibration is an anodyne extension if and only if it is a weak equivalence.

Because of the last property, an anodyne extension is also known as an acyclic cofibration (a cofibration that is a weak equivalence). Also, the weak equivalences between Kan complexes are the same as the simplicial homotopy equivalences between them.

Under the geometric realization | - | : sSetTop, we have:

  • A map f {\displaystyle f} is a weak equivalence if and only if | f | {\displaystyle |f|} is a homotopy equivalence.18
  • A map f {\displaystyle f} is a fibration if and only if | f | {\displaystyle |f|} is a (usual) fibration in the sense of Hurewicz or of Serre.19
  • For an anodyne extension i {\displaystyle i} , | i | {\displaystyle |i|} admits a strong deformation retract.20

Universal left fibration

Let U {\displaystyle U} be the simplicial set where each n-simplex consists of

  • a map p : X Δ n {\displaystyle p:X\to \Delta ^{n}} from a (small) simplicial set X,
  • a section s {\displaystyle s} of p {\displaystyle p} ,
  • for each integer m 0 {\displaystyle m\geq 0} and for each map f : Δ m Δ n {\displaystyle f:\Delta ^{m}\to \Delta ^{n}} , a choice of a pullback of p {\displaystyle p} along f {\displaystyle f} .21

Now, a conjecture of Nichols-Barrer which is now a theorem says that U is the same thing as the ∞-category of ∞-groupoids (Kan complexes) together with some choices.22 In particular, there is a forgetful map

p u n i v : U Kan {\displaystyle p_{univ}:U\to {\textbf {Kan}}} = the ∞-category of Kan complexes,

which is a left fibration. It is universal in the following sense: for each simplicial set X, there is a natural bijection

[ X , Kan ] {\displaystyle [X,{\textbf {Kan}}]\,{\overset {\sim }{\to }}} the set of the isomorphism classes of left fibrations over X

given by pulling-back p u n i v {\displaystyle p_{univ}} , where [ , ] {\displaystyle [,]} means the simplicial homotopy classes of maps.23 In short, Kan {\displaystyle {\textbf {Kan}}} is the classifying space of left fibrations. Given a left fibration over X, a map X Kan {\displaystyle X\to {\textbf {Kan}}} corresponding to it is called the classifying map for that fibration.

In Cisinski's book, the hom-functor Hom : C o p × C Kan {\displaystyle \operatorname {Hom} :C^{op}\times C\to {\textbf {Kan}}} on an ∞-category C is then simply defined to be the classifying map for the left fibration

( s , t ) : S ( C ) C o p × C {\displaystyle (s,t):S(C)\to C^{op}\times C}

where each n-simplex in S ( C ) {\displaystyle S(C)} is a map ( Δ n ) o p Δ n C {\displaystyle (\Delta ^{n})^{op}*\Delta ^{n}\to C} .24 In fact, S ( C ) {\displaystyle S(C)} is an ∞-category called the twisted diagonal of C.25

In his Higher Topos Theory, Lurie constructs an analogous universal cartesian fibration.26

See also

See also

Footnotes

Footnotes

  1. Lurie 2009a, Definition 2.0.0.3.
  2. Beke, Tibor (2008). "Fibrations of simplicial sets". arXiv:0810.4960 [math.CT].
  3. Cisinski 2023, Definition 3.4.1.
  4. Proof: Let l ( F ) {\displaystyle l(F)} = the class of maps having the left lifting property with respect to a class F {\displaystyle F} of maps. Then l ( F ) {\displaystyle l(F)} can be shown to be saturated. By the axiom of choice, if F {\displaystyle F} is the class of surjective maps, then l ( F ) {\displaystyle l(F)} is the class of injective maps. This implies the same is true for monomorphisms between preshaves.
  5. Proof: Since l ( G ) {\displaystyle l(G)} , l for the left lifting property, is saturated and F l ( r ( F ) ) {\displaystyle F\subset l(r(F))} , we have: F ¯ l ( r ( F ) ) {\displaystyle {\overline {F}}\subset l(r(F))} and so r ( F ) = r ( l ( r ( F ) ) r ( F ¯ ) r ( F ) {\displaystyle r(F)=r(l(r(F))\subset r({\overline {F}})\subset r(F)} .
  6. Cisinski 2023, Definition 3.2.1.
  7. Cisinski 2023, Definition 3.2.5.
  8. Cisinski 2023, Definition 3.3.15.
  9. Cisinski 2023, Proposition 3.4.8.
  10. Joyal & Tierney 2008, Theorem 3.2.2.
  11. Cisinski 2023, Proposition 3.4.3.
  12. Cisinski 2023, Corollary 3.2.4.
  13. Joyal & Tierney 2008, Proposition 3.2.2.
  14. Cisinski 2023, Corollary 3.2.8.
  15. Proposition 4.1.4.1. in https://kerodon.net/tag/01BS
  16. Cisinski 2023, Proposition 3.4.4.
  17. Joyal & Tierney 2008, Theorem 3.4.1, Proposition 3.4.2, Proposition 3.4.3.
  18. Joyal & Tierney 2008, Proposition 4.6.3.
  19. Joyal & Tierney 2008, § 2.1.
  20. Joyal & Tierney 2008, Proposition 4.6.1.
  21. Cisinski 2023, Definition 5.2.3.
  22. Cisinski 2023, Theorem 5.2.10.
  23. Cisinski 2023, Corollary 5.3.21.
  24. Cisinski 2023, § 5.6.1. and § 5.8.1.
  25. Cisinski 2023, Proposition 5.6.2.
  26. Lurie 2009a, § 3.3.2.
References

References

Further reading

Further reading