Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Aug 1, 2026

Eastern Low Prussian

Eastern Low Prussian is a subdialect of Low Prussian that was spoken around Angerburg, Insterburg, Memelland, and Tilsit in the eastern territories of East Prussia in the former eastern territories of Germany. Many speakers of this subdialect were Prussian Lithuanians.

Last revised
Aug 1, 2026
Read time
≈ 2 min
Length
374 w
Citations
14
Source
Eastern Low Prussian
German: Mundart des Ostgebietes
Native toLithuania, Poland, Russia (formerly Germany)
RegionEast Prussia
EthnicityGermans, Prussian Lithuanians
Language codes
ISO 639-3

Eastern Low Prussian (German: Mundart des Ostgebietes, lit. dialect of the Eastern territory) is a subdialect of Low Prussian that was spoken around Angerburg (now Węgorzewo, Poland), Insterburg (Chernyakhovsk, Russia), Memelland (Klaipėda County, Lithuania), and Tilsit (Sovetsk, Kaliningrad Oblast, Russia) in the eastern territories of East Prussia in the former eastern territories of Germany.1 Many speakers of this subdialect were Prussian Lithuanians.

Geography

Eastern Low Prussian had borders with Ostsamländisch, Natangian, and Standard German.2 Lithuanian language was spoken within its area.2

Phonology

In difference to varieties to the West, it had no vocalization of /r/.3 Its alveolar /r/ probably counts among its influences from Lithuanian.4 Werdersch has an alveolar as well.5 Like in Werdersch, it has du motst meaning you have to. 5 Eastern Low Prussian has a greater phonetic affinity to Standard German than Samlandic.3 The /ai/ of Samlandic is given as /ei/ with long /e/.3

It has features common with Nehrungisch.6 It has major High German influence, a Lithuanian substrate, even numerous words having undergone High German consonant shift.1 High German influence is, though not exclusively, by Salzburg Protestants.1

It has dorx (with the ach-Laut) for High German durch, English through.5

Grammar

There was a diminutive ending -l around Gusev, Kaliningrad Oblast (Gumbinnen), explained by Upper German influence.4

References

References

  1. Besch et al. (2008), p. 892.
  2. Poschenrieder (1995), p. 130.
  3. Ziesemer (1924), p. 128.
  4. Ziesemer (1924), p. 129.
  5. Ziesemer (1924), p. 133.
  6. Mitzka (1968), p. 209.
Bibliography

Bibliography

External links