Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jun 26, 2026

Butterfly theorem

In Euclidean geometry, the butterfly theorem is a classical result which can be stated as follows:

Last revised
Jun 26, 2026
Read time
≈ 4 min
Length
828 w
Citations
5
Source
Butterfly theorem:
M is the midpoint of XY.
source ↗

In Euclidean geometry, the butterfly theorem is a classical result which can be stated as follows:1: p. 78 

Let M be the midpoint of a chord PQ of a circle, through which two other chords AB and CD are drawn; AD and BC intersect chord PQ at X and Y correspondingly. Then M is the midpoint of XY.

Proof

Proof of Butterfly theorem
  Chord PQ with known midpoint M.
  Perpendiculars from Y.
  Perpendiculars from X.
  Chords intersecting PQ at X, Y, and M.
To be proved: MX = MY. source ↗

A formal proof of the theorem is as follows: Let the perpendiculars XX′ and XX″ be dropped from the point X on the straight lines AM and DM respectively. Similarly, let YY′ and YY″ be dropped from the point Y perpendicular to the straight lines BM and CM respectively.

M X X M Y Y , M X ¯ M Y ¯ = X X ¯ Y Y ¯ . M X X M Y Y , M X ¯ M Y ¯ = X X ¯ Y Y ¯ . A X X C Y Y , X X ¯ Y Y ¯ = A X ¯ C Y ¯ . D X X B Y Y , X X ¯ Y Y ¯ = D X ¯ B Y ¯ . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\triangle MXX'&\sim \triangle MYY',\\[2pt]\therefore {{\overline {MX}} \over {\overline {MY}}}&={{\overline {XX'}} \over {\overline {YY'}}}.\\[8pt]\triangle MXX''&\sim \triangle MYY'',\\[2pt]\therefore {{\overline {MX}} \over {\overline {MY}}}&={{\overline {XX''}} \over {\overline {YY''}}}.\\[8pt]\triangle AXX'&\sim \triangle CYY'',\\[2pt]\therefore {{\overline {XX'}} \over {\overline {YY''}}}&={{\overline {AX}} \over {\overline {CY}}}.\\[8pt]\triangle DXX''&\sim \triangle BYY',\\[2pt]\therefore {{\overline {XX''}} \over {\overline {YY'}}}&={{\overline {DX}} \over {\overline {BY}}}.\end{aligned}}}

From the preceding equations and the intersecting chords theorem, it can be seen that

( M X ¯ M Y ¯ ) 2 = X X ¯ Y Y ¯ X X ¯ Y Y ¯ , = A X ¯ D X ¯ C Y ¯ B Y ¯ , = P X ¯ Q X ¯ P Y ¯ Q Y ¯ , = ( P M ¯ X M ¯ ) ( M Q ¯ + X M ¯ ) ( P M ¯ + M Y ¯ ) ( Q M ¯ M Y ¯ ) , = P M ¯ 2 M X ¯ 2 P M ¯ 2 M Y ¯ 2 , {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\left({{\overline {MX}} \over {\overline {MY}}}\right)^{2}&={{\overline {XX'}} \over {\overline {YY'}}}\cdot {{\overline {XX''}} \over {\overline {YY''}}},\\[2pt]&={{\overline {AX}}\cdot {\overline {DX}} \over {\overline {CY}}\cdot {\overline {BY}}},\\[2pt]&={{\overline {PX}}\cdot {\overline {QX}} \over {\overline {PY}}\cdot {\overline {QY}}},\\[2pt]&={{\bigl (}{\overline {PM}}-{\overline {XM}}{\bigr )}\cdot {\bigl (}{\overline {MQ}}+{\overline {XM}}{\bigr )} \over {\bigl (}{\overline {PM}}+{\overline {MY}}{\bigr )}\cdot {\bigl (}{\overline {QM}}-{\overline {MY}}{\bigr )}},\\[2pt]&={{\overline {PM}}^{2}-{\overline {MX}}^{2} \over {\overline {PM}}^{2}-{\overline {MY}}^{2}},\end{aligned}}}

since PM = MQ. Thus,

M X ¯ 2 M Y ¯ 2 = P M ¯ 2 M X ¯ 2 P M ¯ 2 M Y ¯ 2 . {\displaystyle {{\overline {MX}}^{2} \over {\overline {MY}}^{2}}={{\overline {PM}}^{2}-{\overline {MX}}^{2} \over {\overline {PM}}^{2}-{\overline {MY}}^{2}}.}

Cross-multiplying the latter equation and cancelling out common terms,

M X ¯ 2 P M ¯ 2 M X ¯ 2 M Y ¯ 2 = M Y ¯ 2 P M ¯ 2 M X ¯ 2 M Y ¯ 2 , M X ¯ 2 P M ¯ 2 = M Y ¯ 2 P M ¯ 2 , M X ¯ 2 = M Y ¯ 2 , M X ¯ = M Y ¯ . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\overline {MX}}^{2}\cdot {\overline {PM}}^{2}-{\overline {MX}}^{2}\cdot {\overline {MY}}^{2}&={\overline {MY}}^{2}\cdot {\overline {PM}}^{2}-{\overline {MX}}^{2}\cdot {\overline {MY}}^{2},\\[4pt]\Rightarrow \quad {\overline {MX}}^{2}\cdot {\overline {PM}}^{2}&={\overline {MY}}^{2}\cdot {\overline {PM}}^{2},\\[4pt]\Rightarrow \quad {\overline {MX}}^{2}&={\overline {MY}}^{2},\\[4pt]\Rightarrow \quad {\overline {MX}}&={\overline {MY}}.\end{aligned}}}

Thus, M is the midpoint of XY.

Other proofs exist,2 including one using projective geometry.3

History

Proving the butterfly theorem was posed as a problem by William Wallace in The Gentleman's Mathematical Companion (1803). Three solutions were published in 1804, and in 1805 Sir William Herschel posed the question again in a letter to Wallace. Reverend Thomas Scurr asked the same question again in 1814 in the Gentleman's Diary or Mathematical Repository.4


References

References

  1. Johnson, Roger A., Advanced Euclidean Geometry, Dover Publ., 2007 (orig. 1929).
  2. Martin Celli, "A Proof of the Butterfly Theorem Using the Similarity Factor of the Two Wings", Forum Geometricorum 16, 2016, 337–338. http://forumgeom.fau.edu/FG2016volume16/FG201641.pdf
  3. [1], problem 8.
  4. William Wallace's 1803 Statement of the Butterfly Theorem, cut-the-knot, retrieved 2015-05-07.
External links