Article · Wikipedia archive · Last revised Jun 1, 2026

Bernstein's problem

In differential geometry, Bernstein's problem is as follows: if the graph of a function on Rn−1 is a minimal surface in Rn, does this imply that the function is linear? This is true for n at most 8, but false for n at least 9. The problem is named for Sergei Natanovich Bernstein who solved the case n = 3 in 1914.

Last revised
Jun 1, 2026
Read time
≈ 3 min
Length
640 w
Citations
Source

In differential geometry, Bernstein's problem is as follows: if the graph of a function on Rn−1 is a minimal surface in Rn, does this imply that the function is linear? This is true for n at most 8, but false for n at least 9. The problem is named for Sergei Natanovich Bernstein who solved the case n = 3 in 1914.

Statement

Suppose that f is a function of n − 1 real variables. The graph of f is a surface in Rn, and the condition that this is a minimal surface is that f satisfies the minimal surface equation

i = 1 n 1 x i f x i 1 + j = 1 n 1 ( f x j ) 2 = 0 {\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{n-1}{\frac {\partial }{\partial x_{i}}}{\frac {\frac {\partial f}{\partial x_{i}}}{\sqrt {1+\sum _{j=1}^{n-1}\left({\frac {\partial f}{\partial x_{j}}}\right)^{2}}}}=0}

Bernstein's problem asks whether an entire function (a function defined throughout Rn−1 ) that solves this equation is necessarily a degree-1 polynomial.

History

Bernstein (1915–1917) proved Bernstein's theorem that a graph of a real function on R2 that is also a minimal surface in R3 must be a plane.

Fleming (1962) gave a new proof of Bernstein's theorem by deducing it from the fact that there is no non-planar area-minimizing cone in R3.

De Giorgi (1965) showed that if there is no non-planar area-minimizing cone in Rn−1 then the analogue of Bernstein's theorem is true for graphs in Rn, which in particular implies that it is true in R4.

Almgren (1966) showed there are no non-planar minimizing cones in R4, thus extending Bernstein's theorem to R5.

Simons (1968) showed there are no non-planar minimizing cones in R7, thus extending Bernstein's theorem to R8. He also showed that the surface defined by

{ x R 8 : x 1 2 + x 2 2 + x 3 2 + x 4 2 = x 5 2 + x 6 2 + x 7 2 + x 8 2 } {\displaystyle \{x\in \mathbb {R} ^{8}:x_{1}^{2}+x_{2}^{2}+x_{3}^{2}+x_{4}^{2}=x_{5}^{2}+x_{6}^{2}+x_{7}^{2}+x_{8}^{2}\}}

is a locally stable cone in R8, and asked if it is globally area-minimizing.

Bombieri, De Giorgi & Giusti (1969) showed that Simons' cone is indeed globally minimizing, and that in Rn for n≥9 there are graphs that are minimal, but not hyperplanes. Combined with the result of Simons, this shows that the analogue of Bernstein's theorem is true in Rn for n≤8, and false in higher dimensions.

See also

See also

References

References

External links